Enhancing Transparency in Defining Studied Drugs: The Open-Source Living DiAna Dictionary for Standardizing Drug Names in the FAERS.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1007/s40264-023-01391-4
Michele Fusaroli, Valentina Giunchi, Vera Battini, Stefano Puligheddu, Charles Khouri, Carla Carnovale, Emanuel Raschi, Elisabetta Poluzzi
{"title":"Enhancing Transparency in Defining Studied Drugs: The Open-Source Living DiAna Dictionary for Standardizing Drug Names in the FAERS.","authors":"Michele Fusaroli, Valentina Giunchi, Vera Battini, Stefano Puligheddu, Charles Khouri, Carla Carnovale, Emanuel Raschi, Elisabetta Poluzzi","doi":"10.1007/s40264-023-01391-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In refining drug safety signals, defining the object of study is crucial. While research has explored the effect of different event definitions, drug definition is often overlooked. The US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) records drug names as free text, necessitating mapping to active ingredients. Although pre-mapped databases exist, the subjectivity and lack of transparency of the mapping process lead to a loss of control over the object of study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We implemented the DiAna dictionary, systematically mapping individual free-text instances to their corresponding active ingredients and linking them to the World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (WHO-ATC) classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved all drug names reported to the FAERS (2004-December 2022). Using existing vocabularies and string editing, we automatically mapped free text to ingredients. We manually revised the mapping and linked it to the ATC classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retrieved 18,151,842 reports, with 74,143,411 drug entries. We manually checked the first 14,832 terms, up to terms occurring over 200 times (96.88% of total drug entries), to 6282 unique active ingredients. Automatic unchecked translations extend the standardization to 346,854 terms (98.94%). The DiAna dictionary showed a higher sensitivity compared with RxNorm alone, particularly for specific drugs (e.g., rimegepant, adapalene, drospirenone, umeclidinium). The most prominent drug classes in the FAERS were immunomodulating (37.40%) and neurologic drugs (29.19%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DiAna dictionary, as a dynamic open-source tool, provides transparency and flexibility, enabling researchers to actively shape drug definitions during the mapping phase. This empowerment enhances accuracy, reproducibility, and interpretability of results.</p>","PeriodicalId":11382,"journal":{"name":"Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"271-284"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10874306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-023-01391-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In refining drug safety signals, defining the object of study is crucial. While research has explored the effect of different event definitions, drug definition is often overlooked. The US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) records drug names as free text, necessitating mapping to active ingredients. Although pre-mapped databases exist, the subjectivity and lack of transparency of the mapping process lead to a loss of control over the object of study.

Objective: We implemented the DiAna dictionary, systematically mapping individual free-text instances to their corresponding active ingredients and linking them to the World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (WHO-ATC) classification.

Methods: We retrieved all drug names reported to the FAERS (2004-December 2022). Using existing vocabularies and string editing, we automatically mapped free text to ingredients. We manually revised the mapping and linked it to the ATC classification.

Results: We retrieved 18,151,842 reports, with 74,143,411 drug entries. We manually checked the first 14,832 terms, up to terms occurring over 200 times (96.88% of total drug entries), to 6282 unique active ingredients. Automatic unchecked translations extend the standardization to 346,854 terms (98.94%). The DiAna dictionary showed a higher sensitivity compared with RxNorm alone, particularly for specific drugs (e.g., rimegepant, adapalene, drospirenone, umeclidinium). The most prominent drug classes in the FAERS were immunomodulating (37.40%) and neurologic drugs (29.19%).

Conclusion: The DiAna dictionary, as a dynamic open-source tool, provides transparency and flexibility, enabling researchers to actively shape drug definitions during the mapping phase. This empowerment enhances accuracy, reproducibility, and interpretability of results.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高研究药物定义的透明度:用于规范 FAERS 中药物名称的开源 Living DiAna 字典。
介绍:在完善药物安全信号时,确定研究对象至关重要。虽然已有研究探讨了不同事件定义的影响,但药物定义往往被忽视。美国 FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)以自由文本形式记录药物名称,因此必须将其映射到活性成分。虽然存在预先映射的数据库,但映射过程的主观性和缺乏透明度导致研究对象失去控制:我们建立了 DiAna 字典,系统地将单个自由文本实例映射到其相应的有效成分,并将它们与世界卫生组织的解剖学治疗化学(WHO-ATC)分类联系起来:我们检索了向 FAERS 报告的所有药物名称(2004 年至 2022 年 12 月)。利用现有词汇表和字符串编辑,我们自动将自由文本映射到成分。我们手动修改了映射,并将其与 ATC 分类相链接:我们检索了 18,151,842 份报告,其中包含 74,143,411 个药物条目。我们人工检查了前 14,832 个术语,直到术语出现次数超过 200 次(占药物条目总数的 96.88%),共检查出 6282 种独特的活性成分。未经检查的自动翻译将标准化范围扩大到 346,854 个术语(98.94%)。DiAna 词典与 RxNorm 相比具有更高的灵敏度,尤其是对特定药物(如利美昔潘、阿达帕林、屈螺酮、乌甲素)。FAERS 中最主要的药物类别是免疫调节药物(37.40%)和神经系统药物(29.19%):DiAna 字典作为一个动态的开源工具,具有透明度和灵活性,使研究人员能够在制图阶段积极塑造药物定义。这种授权提高了结果的准确性、可重复性和可解释性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Safety
Drug Safety 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Safety is the official journal of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance. The journal includes: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on epidemiology, clinical features, prevention and management of adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes. In-depth benefit-risk assessment of adverse effect and efficacy data for a drug in a defined therapeutic area. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies in disciplines such as pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacology and toxicology, and pharmacogenomics. Editorials and commentaries on topical issues. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Drug Safety Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
期刊最新文献
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Long-Term Safety Analysis of the BBV152 Coronavirus Vaccine in Adolescents and Adults: Findings from a 1-Year Prospective Study in North India. A Calculated Risk: Evaluation of QTc Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Alerts and Performance of the Tisdale Risk Score Calculator. Description and Validation of a Novel AI Tool, LabelComp, for the Identification of Adverse Event Changes in FDA Labeling. Examining the Effect of Missing Data and Unmeasured Confounding on External Comparator Studies: Case Studies and Simulations. Unveiling the Burden of Drug-Induced Impulsivity: A Network Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1