The relationship between third molar agenesis and craniofacial morphology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European journal of orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjad081
Yushi Le, Mingjuan Li, Feng Li, Shuxuan Wu, Chongjie Zhu, Qilong Wan
{"title":"The relationship between third molar agenesis and craniofacial morphology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yushi Le, Mingjuan Li, Feng Li, Shuxuan Wu, Chongjie Zhu, Qilong Wan","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjad081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Agenesis of third molar agenesis has a higher incidence than other tooth development anomalies. Previous research identified a potential correlation between third molar agenesis and specific craniofacial morphology; however, no systematic review and meta-analysis on this topic currently exists.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between third molar agenesis and craniofacial sagittal and vertical morphology.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>An electronic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library without restrictions on publication year or language; this was supplemented by the manual retrieval of relevant literature.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Cross-sectional studies that compared craniofacial morphology using angular and linear measurements obtained from lateral cephalography between patients with third molar agenesis and those without were included.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>The quality assessment of the enrolled articles was evaluated by the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed by Review Manager software (The Cochrane Collaborative, version 5.4, Cochrane IMS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of seven studies were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated that the ANB (mean differences (MD) = -0.75, 95% CI: -1.31 to -0.19, P < 0.01), palate length (ANS-PNS, MD = -1.68, 95% CI: -2.24 to -1.11, P < 0.01), and mandibular length (Go-Pog, MD = -0.36, 95% CI: -0.59 to -0.13, P < 0.01) were smaller in patients with third molar agenesis. With regard to vertical craniofacial morphology, the mandibular plane angle (MP-FH; MD = -1.88, 95% CI: -3.45 to -0.31, P = 0.02), gonial angle (gonial angle; MD = -1.73, 95% CI: -2.69 to -0.77, P < 0.01) and lower face height (lower face heigh angle; MD = -1.36, 95% CI: -1.94 to -0.77, P < 0.01) were smaller in patients with third molar agenesis, indicating a flatter or brachyfacial skeletal pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study suggest that third molar agenesis maybe associated with a reduced maxillary length and a flatter mandible. However, these findings need to be interpreted with caution due to inconsistencies in the certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42023448226).</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjad081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Agenesis of third molar agenesis has a higher incidence than other tooth development anomalies. Previous research identified a potential correlation between third molar agenesis and specific craniofacial morphology; however, no systematic review and meta-analysis on this topic currently exists.

Objective: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between third molar agenesis and craniofacial sagittal and vertical morphology.

Search methods: An electronic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library without restrictions on publication year or language; this was supplemented by the manual retrieval of relevant literature.

Selection criteria: Cross-sectional studies that compared craniofacial morphology using angular and linear measurements obtained from lateral cephalography between patients with third molar agenesis and those without were included.

Data collection and analysis: The quality assessment of the enrolled articles was evaluated by the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed by Review Manager software (The Cochrane Collaborative, version 5.4, Cochrane IMS).

Results: A total of seven studies were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated that the ANB (mean differences (MD) = -0.75, 95% CI: -1.31 to -0.19, P < 0.01), palate length (ANS-PNS, MD = -1.68, 95% CI: -2.24 to -1.11, P < 0.01), and mandibular length (Go-Pog, MD = -0.36, 95% CI: -0.59 to -0.13, P < 0.01) were smaller in patients with third molar agenesis. With regard to vertical craniofacial morphology, the mandibular plane angle (MP-FH; MD = -1.88, 95% CI: -3.45 to -0.31, P = 0.02), gonial angle (gonial angle; MD = -1.73, 95% CI: -2.69 to -0.77, P < 0.01) and lower face height (lower face heigh angle; MD = -1.36, 95% CI: -1.94 to -0.77, P < 0.01) were smaller in patients with third molar agenesis, indicating a flatter or brachyfacial skeletal pattern.

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that third molar agenesis maybe associated with a reduced maxillary length and a flatter mandible. However, these findings need to be interpreted with caution due to inconsistencies in the certainty of evidence.

Clinical trial registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023448226).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第三磨牙缺失与颅面形态的关系:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
背景:与其他牙齿发育异常相比,第三磨牙缺失的发病率较高。以前的研究发现,第三磨牙缺失与特定的颅面形态之间存在潜在的相关性;但是,目前还没有关于这一主题的系统回顾和荟萃分析:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估第三磨牙缺失与颅面矢状和垂直形态之间的关联:在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆上进行电子检索,不限制出版年份或语言,并辅以人工检索相关文献:数据收集和分析:采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的批判性评估工具对入选文章进行质量评估。采用Review Manager软件(Cochrane Collaborative,5.4版,Cochrane IMS)进行元分析和敏感性分析:结果:共纳入七项研究。元分析表明,第三磨牙发育不全患者的ANB(平均差(MD)=-0.75,95% CI:-1.31至-0.19,P<0.01)、腭长(ANS-PNS,MD=-1.68,95% CI:-2.24至-1.11,P<0.01)和下颌长(Go-Pog,MD=-0.36,95% CI:-0.59至-0.13,P<0.01)较小。在颅面垂直形态方面,下颌平面角(MP-FH;MD =-1.88,95% CI:-3.45 至 -0.31,P = 0.02)、颌角(gonial angle;MD =-1.73,95% CI:-2.69 至 -0.77,P < 0.01)和脸部下高(lower face heigh angle;MD =-1.36,95% CI:-1.94 至 -0.77,P < 0.01)在第三磨牙缺失患者中更小,这表明患者的骨骼形态更扁平或畸形:本研究结果表明,第三磨牙缺失可能与上颌骨长度减少和下颌骨扁平有关。然而,由于证据的确定性不一致,需要谨慎解释这些发现:prospero(CRD42023448226)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
期刊最新文献
Clinical risk factors caused by third molar levelling following extraction of a mandibular second molar. Does incisor inclination change during orthodontic treatment affect gingival thickness and the width of keratinized gingiva? A prospective controlled study. Roles of B-cell lymphoma 6 in orthodontic tooth movement of rat molars. Influence of genetic and environmental factors on transverse growth. The effect of micro-osteoperforation (MOP) in molar distalization treatments: an exploratory systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1