A review of racial disparities in ovarian cancer and clinical trials.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000923
Maryam Ali, Krishnansu S Tewari
{"title":"A review of racial disparities in ovarian cancer and clinical trials.","authors":"Maryam Ali, Krishnansu S Tewari","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Ovarian cancer ranks fifth in mortality among women with cancer and accounts for more death compared to any other gynecological cancers. This review summarizes the most recent literature on disparities in ovarian cancer as well as within recent clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies have identified a notable disparity in genetic testing utilization, disease stage at the time of diagnosis, and adherence to treatment guidelines between Black women and their White counterparts, ultimately leading to increased mortality rates among Black women from ovarian cancer. Additionally, there is an underreporting of race in clinical trials and those that do report race demonstrate significant racial disparities within trial participants with the majority of participants being White.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>It is imperative that we address the significant racial disparities within ovarian cancer and clinical trials to establish a framework of equitable healthcare provision. Multiple determinants, such as implicit bias, provider mistrust, accessibility hurdles, and socioeconomic influences, appear to contribute to the current disparities faced by women of color. Further investigation is warranted, encompassing a deeper understanding of diverse patient perspectives and identifying barriers to receiving optimal care and participating in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"36 1","pages":"23-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Ovarian cancer ranks fifth in mortality among women with cancer and accounts for more death compared to any other gynecological cancers. This review summarizes the most recent literature on disparities in ovarian cancer as well as within recent clinical trials.

Recent findings: Recent studies have identified a notable disparity in genetic testing utilization, disease stage at the time of diagnosis, and adherence to treatment guidelines between Black women and their White counterparts, ultimately leading to increased mortality rates among Black women from ovarian cancer. Additionally, there is an underreporting of race in clinical trials and those that do report race demonstrate significant racial disparities within trial participants with the majority of participants being White.

Summary: It is imperative that we address the significant racial disparities within ovarian cancer and clinical trials to establish a framework of equitable healthcare provision. Multiple determinants, such as implicit bias, provider mistrust, accessibility hurdles, and socioeconomic influences, appear to contribute to the current disparities faced by women of color. Further investigation is warranted, encompassing a deeper understanding of diverse patient perspectives and identifying barriers to receiving optimal care and participating in clinical trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卵巢癌种族差异与临床试验综述。
审查目的:卵巢癌在妇女癌症死亡率中排名第五,与其他妇科癌症相比,卵巢癌造成的死亡人数更多。本综述总结了有关卵巢癌差异以及近期临床试验的最新文献:最近的研究发现,黑人妇女与白人妇女在基因检测的使用、诊断时的疾病分期以及治疗指南的遵守方面存在明显差异,最终导致黑人妇女卵巢癌死亡率上升。此外,临床试验中的种族报告不足,而那些报告了种族的临床试验表明,试验参与者中存在显著的种族差异,大多数参与者为白人。摘要:我们必须解决卵巢癌和临床试验中存在的显著种族差异,以建立公平的医疗保健服务框架。多种决定因素,如隐性偏见、提供者的不信任、可及性障碍和社会经济影响,似乎都是造成有色人种妇女目前所面临差距的原因。有必要开展进一步调查,深入了解不同患者的观点,并找出获得最佳治疗和参与临床试验的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including reproductive endocrinology, gynecologic cancer and fertility– every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Access to maternity care: challenges and solutions for improving equity across US communities. Contemporary uses of "lethal" or "life limiting" terminology in perinatal research. Rho(D) immune globulin shortage and fetal Rh(D) screening with cell-free DNA. State of the art endocrine treatments for patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer in 2025. Sleep disturbance and menopause.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1