Connecting Adaptive Perceptual Learning and Signal Detection Theory in Skin Cancer Screening.

Philip J Kellman, Sally Krasne, Christine M Massey, Everett W Mettler
{"title":"Connecting Adaptive Perceptual Learning and Signal Detection Theory in Skin Cancer Screening.","authors":"Philip J Kellman, Sally Krasne, Christine M Massey, Everett W Mettler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Combining perceptual learning techniques with adaptive learning algorithms has been shown to accelerate the development of expertise in medical and STEM learning domains (Kellman & Massey, 2013; Kellman, Jacoby, Massey & Krasne, 2022). Virtually all adaptive learning systems have relied on simple accuracy data that does not take into account response bias, a problem that may be especially consequential in multi-category perceptual classifications. We investigated whether adaptive perceptual learning in skin cancer screening can be enhanced by incorporating signal detection theory (SDT) methods that separate sensitivity from criterion. SDT-style concepts were used to alter sequencing, and separately to define mastery (category retirement). SDT retirement used a running d' estimate calculated from a recent window of trials based on hit and false alarm rates. Undergraduate participants used a Skin Cancer PALM (perceptual adaptive learning module) to learn classification of 10 cancerous and readily-confused non-cancerous skin lesion types. Four adaptive conditions varied either the type of adaptive sequencing (standard vs. SDT) or retirement criteria (standard vs. SDT). A non-adaptive control condition presented didactic instruction on dermatologic screening in video form, including images, classification schemes, and detailed explanations. All adaptive conditions robustly outperformed the non-adaptive control in both learning efficiency and fluency (large effect sizes). Between adaptive conditions, SDT retirement criteria produced greater learning efficiency than standard, accuracy-based mastery criteria at both immediate and delayed posttests (medium effect sizes). SDT sequencing and standard adaptive sequencing did not differ. SDT enhancements to adaptive perceptual learning procedures have potential to enhance learning efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":72634,"journal":{"name":"CogSci ... Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society (U.S.). Conference","volume":"45 ","pages":"3251-3258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10764053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CogSci ... Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society (U.S.). Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Combining perceptual learning techniques with adaptive learning algorithms has been shown to accelerate the development of expertise in medical and STEM learning domains (Kellman & Massey, 2013; Kellman, Jacoby, Massey & Krasne, 2022). Virtually all adaptive learning systems have relied on simple accuracy data that does not take into account response bias, a problem that may be especially consequential in multi-category perceptual classifications. We investigated whether adaptive perceptual learning in skin cancer screening can be enhanced by incorporating signal detection theory (SDT) methods that separate sensitivity from criterion. SDT-style concepts were used to alter sequencing, and separately to define mastery (category retirement). SDT retirement used a running d' estimate calculated from a recent window of trials based on hit and false alarm rates. Undergraduate participants used a Skin Cancer PALM (perceptual adaptive learning module) to learn classification of 10 cancerous and readily-confused non-cancerous skin lesion types. Four adaptive conditions varied either the type of adaptive sequencing (standard vs. SDT) or retirement criteria (standard vs. SDT). A non-adaptive control condition presented didactic instruction on dermatologic screening in video form, including images, classification schemes, and detailed explanations. All adaptive conditions robustly outperformed the non-adaptive control in both learning efficiency and fluency (large effect sizes). Between adaptive conditions, SDT retirement criteria produced greater learning efficiency than standard, accuracy-based mastery criteria at both immediate and delayed posttests (medium effect sizes). SDT sequencing and standard adaptive sequencing did not differ. SDT enhancements to adaptive perceptual learning procedures have potential to enhance learning efficiency.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将皮肤癌筛查中的自适应感知学习和信号检测理论联系起来。
事实证明,将感知学习技术与自适应学习算法相结合,可以加速医学和 STEM 学习领域专业知识的发展(Kellman & Massey, 2013; Kellman, Jacoby, Massey & Krasne, 2022)。几乎所有的自适应学习系统都依赖于简单的准确率数据,而这些数据并没有考虑到反应偏差,这个问题在多类别感知分类中可能尤其严重。我们研究了皮肤癌筛查中的自适应知觉学习是否可以通过结合信号检测理论(SDT)方法来增强,这种方法将灵敏度与标准分离开来。SDT式的概念被用来改变排序,并分别用来定义掌握(类别退出)。SDT 退隐使用的是根据命中率和误报率从最近的试验窗口计算出的运行 d'估计值。本科生学员使用皮肤癌 PALM(感知自适应学习模块)学习 10 种癌症和容易混淆的非癌症皮肤病变类型的分类。四种适应性条件改变了适应性排序的类型(标准与 SDT)或退役标准(标准与 SDT)。非适应性对照条件以视频形式展示皮肤病筛查的教学内容,包括图像、分类方案和详细解释。在学习效率和流畅性方面,所有适应性条件都明显优于非适应性对照条件(影响大小较大)。在适应性条件之间,SDT 退学标准在即时和延迟后测中的学习效率均高于基于准确性的标准掌握标准(中等效应大小)。SDT排序与标准适应性排序没有差异。SDT对自适应知觉学习程序的改进有可能提高学习效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Fatigue on Word Production in Aphasia. Connecting Adaptive Perceptual Learning and Signal Detection Theory in Skin Cancer Screening. Very Young Infants' Sensitivity to Consonant Mispronunciations in Word Recognition. Verb vocabularies are shaped by complex meanings from the onset of development. A Neural Network Model of Continual Learning with Cognitive Control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1