Evaluation of accuracy of deep learning and conventional neural network algorithms in detection of dental implant type using intraoral radiographic images: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mahmood Dashti, Jimmy Londono, Shohreh Ghasemi, Shivasadat Tabatabaei, Sara Hashemi, Kimia Baghaei, Paulo J. Palma, Zohaib Khurshid
{"title":"Evaluation of accuracy of deep learning and conventional neural network algorithms in detection of dental implant type using intraoral radiographic images: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mahmood Dashti, Jimmy Londono, Shohreh Ghasemi, Shivasadat Tabatabaei, Sara Hashemi, Kimia Baghaei, Paulo J. Palma, Zohaib Khurshid","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Statement of problem</h3><p>With the growing importance of implant brand detection in clinical practice, the accuracy of machine learning algorithms in implant brand detection has become a subject of research interest. Recent studies have shown promising results for the use of machine learning in implant brand detection. However, despite these promising findings, a comprehensive evaluation of the accuracy of machine learning in implant brand detection is needed.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of deep learning algorithms in implant brand detection using 2-dimensional images such as from periapical or panoramic radiographs.</p><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Scopus Secondary, and Web of Science databases. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Meta-analyses were performed using the random-effects model to estimate the pooled performance measures and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using STATA v.17.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirteen studies were selected for the systematic review, and 3 were used in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the studies found that the overall accuracy of CNN algorithms in detecting dental implants in radiographic images was 95.63%, with a sensitivity of 94.55% and a specificity of 97.91%. The highest reported accuracy was 99.08% for CNN Multitask ResNet152 algorithm, and sensitivity and specificity were 100.00% and 98.70% respectively for the deep CNN (Neuro-T version 2.0.1) algorithm with the Straumann SLActive BLT implant brand. All studies had a low risk of bias.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The highest accuracy and sensitivity were reported in studies using CNN Multitask ResNet152 and deep CNN (Neuro-T version 2.0.1) algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":501672,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem

With the growing importance of implant brand detection in clinical practice, the accuracy of machine learning algorithms in implant brand detection has become a subject of research interest. Recent studies have shown promising results for the use of machine learning in implant brand detection. However, despite these promising findings, a comprehensive evaluation of the accuracy of machine learning in implant brand detection is needed.

Purpose

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of deep learning algorithms in implant brand detection using 2-dimensional images such as from periapical or panoramic radiographs.

Material and methods

Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Scopus Secondary, and Web of Science databases. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Meta-analyses were performed using the random-effects model to estimate the pooled performance measures and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using STATA v.17.

Results

Thirteen studies were selected for the systematic review, and 3 were used in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the studies found that the overall accuracy of CNN algorithms in detecting dental implants in radiographic images was 95.63%, with a sensitivity of 94.55% and a specificity of 97.91%. The highest reported accuracy was 99.08% for CNN Multitask ResNet152 algorithm, and sensitivity and specificity were 100.00% and 98.70% respectively for the deep CNN (Neuro-T version 2.0.1) algorithm with the Straumann SLActive BLT implant brand. All studies had a low risk of bias.

Conclusions

The highest accuracy and sensitivity were reported in studies using CNN Multitask ResNet152 and deep CNN (Neuro-T version 2.0.1) algorithms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估深度学习和传统神经网络算法使用口内放射影像检测牙科植入物类型的准确性:系统回顾与荟萃分析
问题陈述随着种植体品牌检测在临床实践中的重要性日益增加,机器学习算法在种植体品牌检测中的准确性已成为研究的热点。最近的研究表明,机器学习在植入物品牌检测中的应用前景广阔。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估深度学习算法在使用二维图像(如根尖周或全景X光片)进行种植体品牌检测中的准确性、灵敏度和特异性。材料和方法在PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Scopus Secondary和Web of Science数据库中进行了电子检索。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2(QUADAS-2)工具对符合纳入标准的研究进行质量评估。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,使用 STATA v.17 估计汇总的性能指标和 95% 的置信区间 (CI)。荟萃分析发现,CNN 算法在放射影像中检测种植牙的总体准确率为 95.63%,灵敏度为 94.55%,特异度为 97.91%。据报道,CNN 多任务 ResNet 152 算法的准确率最高,达到 99.08%;使用 Straumann SLActive BLT 种植体品牌的深度 CNN(Neuro-T 2.0.1 版)算法的灵敏度和特异度分别为 100.00% 和 98.70%。结论使用 CNN 多任务 ResNet 152 和深度 CNN(Neuro-T 2.0.1 版)算法的研究报告了最高的准确度和灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of altering the dispensing methods of resin-based cements on their physical and bonding qualities. Factors affecting accuracy in the additive manufacturing of interim dental prostheses: A systematic review. Evaluation of the optical and surface properties of monolithic CAD-CAM ceramics after simulated tooth-brushing. Evaluation of axial displacement and torque loss of Morse-type prosthetic abutments of different angular tapers to their respective implants. Prospective clinical-radiological study of the survival and behavior of short implants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1