Evaluation of accuracy of deep learning and conventional neural network algorithms in detection of dental implant type using intraoral radiographic images: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Mahmood Dashti DDS , Jimmy Londono DDS, FACP , Shohreh Ghasemi BDS, MSc , Shivasadat Tabatabaei DDS , Sara Hashemi DDS , Kimia Baghaei DDS , Paulo J. Palma DMD, MSc, PhD , Zohaib Khurshid MRes, FHEA, MFDS RCS
{"title":"Evaluation of accuracy of deep learning and conventional neural network algorithms in detection of dental implant type using intraoral radiographic images: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mahmood Dashti DDS , Jimmy Londono DDS, FACP , Shohreh Ghasemi BDS, MSc , Shivasadat Tabatabaei DDS , Sara Hashemi DDS , Kimia Baghaei DDS , Paulo J. Palma DMD, MSc, PhD , Zohaib Khurshid MRes, FHEA, MFDS RCS","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>With the growing importance of implant brand detection in clinical practice, the accuracy of machine learning algorithms in implant brand detection has become a subject of research interest. Recent studies have shown promising results for the use of machine learning in implant brand detection. However, despite these promising findings, a comprehensive evaluation of the accuracy of machine learning in implant brand detection is needed.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of deep learning algorithms in implant brand detection using 2-dimensional images such as from periapical or panoramic radiographs.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Scopus Secondary, and Web of Science databases. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Meta-analyses were performed using the random-effects model to estimate the pooled performance measures and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using STATA v.17.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirteen studies were selected for the systematic review, and 3 were used in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the studies found that the overall accuracy of CNN algorithms in detecting dental implants in radiographic images was 95.63%, with a sensitivity of 94.55% and a specificity of 97.91%. The highest reported accuracy was 99.08% for CNN Multitask ResNet152 algorithm, and sensitivity and specificity were 100.00% and 98.70% respectively for the deep CNN (Neuro-T version 2.0.1) algorithm with the Straumann SLActive BLT implant brand. All studies had a low risk of bias.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The highest accuracy and sensitivity were reported in studies using CNN Multitask ResNet152 and deep CNN (Neuro-T version 2.0.1) algorithms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"133 1","pages":"Pages 137-146"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391323008120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Statement of problem
With the growing importance of implant brand detection in clinical practice, the accuracy of machine learning algorithms in implant brand detection has become a subject of research interest. Recent studies have shown promising results for the use of machine learning in implant brand detection. However, despite these promising findings, a comprehensive evaluation of the accuracy of machine learning in implant brand detection is needed.
Purpose
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of deep learning algorithms in implant brand detection using 2-dimensional images such as from periapical or panoramic radiographs.
Material and methods
Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Scopus Secondary, and Web of Science databases. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Meta-analyses were performed using the random-effects model to estimate the pooled performance measures and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using STATA v.17.
Results
Thirteen studies were selected for the systematic review, and 3 were used in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the studies found that the overall accuracy of CNN algorithms in detecting dental implants in radiographic images was 95.63%, with a sensitivity of 94.55% and a specificity of 97.91%. The highest reported accuracy was 99.08% for CNN Multitask ResNet152 algorithm, and sensitivity and specificity were 100.00% and 98.70% respectively for the deep CNN (Neuro-T version 2.0.1) algorithm with the Straumann SLActive BLT implant brand. All studies had a low risk of bias.
Conclusions
The highest accuracy and sensitivity were reported in studies using CNN Multitask ResNet152 and deep CNN (Neuro-T version 2.0.1) algorithms.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.