The taboo remains: Responding to a critical commentary

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2023.101806
Noah Carl, Michael A. Woodley of Menie
{"title":"The taboo remains: Responding to a critical commentary","authors":"Noah Carl,&nbsp;Michael A. Woodley of Menie","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2023.101806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Jackson Jr. and Winston (2021) claim there is no taboo against research on race and intelligence. We argue, to the contrary, that there is a taboo against such research. We begin by addressing Jackson Jr. and Winston's arguments concerning expert surveys, as well as their criticisms of our published database of controversies. We then provide additional evidence of the taboo, and explain why it would be expected given the features of academic social science in Western countries. We also point out that Jackson Jr. and Winston's paper exemplifies the very taboo they claim does not exist.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 101806"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289623000879","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jackson Jr. and Winston (2021) claim there is no taboo against research on race and intelligence. We argue, to the contrary, that there is a taboo against such research. We begin by addressing Jackson Jr. and Winston's arguments concerning expert surveys, as well as their criticisms of our published database of controversies. We then provide additional evidence of the taboo, and explain why it would be expected given the features of academic social science in Western countries. We also point out that Jackson Jr. and Winston's paper exemplifies the very taboo they claim does not exist.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
禁忌依然存在回应批评性评论
小杰克逊和温斯顿(2021 年)声称,对种族和智力的研究不存在禁忌。而我们的观点恰恰相反,我们认为对此类研究存在禁忌。我们首先讨论了小杰克逊和温斯顿关于专家调查的论点,以及他们对我们公布的争议数据库的批评。然后,我们提供了有关禁忌的更多证据,并解释了为什么从西方国家社会科学学术的特点来看,这种禁忌是意料之中的。我们还指出,小杰克逊和温斯顿的论文恰恰体现了他们声称不存在的禁忌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence
Intelligence PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.
期刊最新文献
More than correlates: Longitudinal evidence of bidirectional effects between associative learning and fluid intelligence in elementary school children Corrigendum to ‘analysis of the intelligence quotient and its contribution to reactive violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis’ [intelligence 114 (2026) 101969] What should replicate in intelligence research? Setting the bar for a cumulative science Emotional intelligence profiles and well-being among Chinese university students: The mediating role of basic psychological needs Development of the language of personality sphere: Historical evidence for intellect's role in hierarchical-reticular models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1