The relationships between the growth mindset, writing feedback literacy, and feedback engagement of undergraduate students in L1 Chinese writing learning

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Educational Evaluation Pub Date : 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101320
Xinhua Zhu , Yuan Yao , Qi Lu
{"title":"The relationships between the growth mindset, writing feedback literacy, and feedback engagement of undergraduate students in L1 Chinese writing learning","authors":"Xinhua Zhu ,&nbsp;Yuan Yao ,&nbsp;Qi Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>While the body of research on student feedback literacy in the field of education is growing, the association of such literacy with feedback engagement in L1 writing education remains relatively unexplored. Moreover, the potential relationship of a growth mindset, which serves as a motivational factor, with student feedback literacy has yet to be thoroughly investigated. Considering these gaps, the present study aimed to explore the relationships between a growth mindset, student writing feedback literacy, and feedback engagement. A sample of 236 sophomore English major students from a Chinese university was recruited. Employing </span>path analysis, the study revealed that having a growth mindset was positively associated with all five features of student writing feedback literacy: appreciating feedback, acknowledging different feedback sources, making judgments, managing affect, and taking action. Moreover, the study revealed a nuanced relationship between students’ writing feedback literacy and their feedback engagement, with different features of writing feedback literacy having differential associations with distinct dimensions of feedback engagement. The study contributes to the literature in three ways. First, it expands our knowledge of the relationship between student feedback literacy and feedback engagement by delving deeper into the one-to-one association between different features of writing feedback literacy and various dimensions of feedback engagement. Second, it advances our understanding of how a growth mindset is related to shaping students’ writing feedback literacy. Finally, it provides evidence supporting the construct validity of the student writing feedback literacy scale in L1 writing learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 101320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X2300086X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the body of research on student feedback literacy in the field of education is growing, the association of such literacy with feedback engagement in L1 writing education remains relatively unexplored. Moreover, the potential relationship of a growth mindset, which serves as a motivational factor, with student feedback literacy has yet to be thoroughly investigated. Considering these gaps, the present study aimed to explore the relationships between a growth mindset, student writing feedback literacy, and feedback engagement. A sample of 236 sophomore English major students from a Chinese university was recruited. Employing path analysis, the study revealed that having a growth mindset was positively associated with all five features of student writing feedback literacy: appreciating feedback, acknowledging different feedback sources, making judgments, managing affect, and taking action. Moreover, the study revealed a nuanced relationship between students’ writing feedback literacy and their feedback engagement, with different features of writing feedback literacy having differential associations with distinct dimensions of feedback engagement. The study contributes to the literature in three ways. First, it expands our knowledge of the relationship between student feedback literacy and feedback engagement by delving deeper into the one-to-one association between different features of writing feedback literacy and various dimensions of feedback engagement. Second, it advances our understanding of how a growth mindset is related to shaping students’ writing feedback literacy. Finally, it provides evidence supporting the construct validity of the student writing feedback literacy scale in L1 writing learning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
汉语第一语言写作学习中本科生的成长心态、写作反馈素养与反馈参与之间的关系
虽然教育领域关于学生反馈素养的研究越来越多,但这种素养与 L1 写作教育中反馈参与的关系仍相对欠缺。此外,作为激励因素的成长心态与学生反馈素养之间的潜在关系也有待深入研究。考虑到这些差距,本研究旨在探讨成长型思维模式、学生写作反馈素养和反馈参与之间的关系。本研究选取了中国某大学英语专业 236 名大二学生作为样本。通过路径分析,研究发现成长型思维与学生写作反馈素养的五个特征均呈正相关:欣赏反馈、承认不同的反馈来源、做出判断、管理情感和采取行动。此外,研究还揭示了学生写作反馈素养与反馈参与之间的细微关系,写作反馈素养的不同特征与反馈参与的不同维度有着不同的关联。本研究在三个方面对文献做出了贡献。首先,它通过深入研究写作反馈素养的不同特征与反馈参与的不同维度之间的一一对应关系,拓展了我们对学生反馈素养与反馈参与之间关系的认识。其次,它加深了我们对成长型思维与塑造学生写作反馈素养之间关系的理解。最后,它为学生写作反馈素养量表在 L1 写作学习中的建构有效性提供了证据支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
期刊最新文献
Preservice teachers’ pedagogical and psychological knowledge: Structure and learning opportunities The effects of peer feedback provision and reception on lower-proficiency EFL learners’ writing development Assessment as learning: Evidence based on meta-analysis and quantitative ethnography research Teaching quality and student achievement inequalities in low- and middle-income countries: A hierarchical linear model analysis Do children speaking indigenous and regional languages benefit equally from updated curricula? A report on a longitudinal quasi-experimental pilot study in Central Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1