Pub Date : 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101556
Qingke Guo , Xiaojie Xin
This study employs PISA data (2006–2022) to examine immigrant-native achievement gaps in EU and non-EU nations across three sub-studies. Study 1 reveals that immigrant disadvantage is not universal; in fact, immigrant students outperform their native peers in many non-EU and several EU nations. Study 2, focusing on stable EU member states, finds consistently larger achievement gaps in EU nations compared to non-EU nations. Study 3 utilizes latent growth modeling and identifies no significant divergence in gap trends between EU and non-EU education systems. According to existing literature, these differences may originate from factors such as migration policy selectivity, socioeconomic backgrounds, and institutional responsiveness. Although performance gaps persist, EU nations exhibit lower within-country score dispersion, pointing to greater internal equity. The study concludes with policy recommendations aimed at narrowing these gaps, including refining immigrant screening mechanisms, enhancing teacher preparation in multicultural education, and reforming early tracking systems.
{"title":"Larger immigrant-native academic achievement gaps in EU countries: A study of the PISA assessment from 2006 to 2022","authors":"Qingke Guo , Xiaojie Xin","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101556","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101556","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study employs PISA data (2006–2022) to examine immigrant-native achievement gaps in EU and non-EU nations across three sub-studies. Study 1 reveals that immigrant disadvantage is not universal; in fact, immigrant students outperform their native peers in many non-EU and several EU nations. Study 2, focusing on stable EU member states, finds consistently larger achievement gaps in EU nations compared to non-EU nations. Study 3 utilizes latent growth modeling and identifies no significant divergence in gap trends between EU and non-EU education systems. According to existing literature, these differences may originate from factors such as migration policy selectivity, socioeconomic backgrounds, and institutional responsiveness. Although performance gaps persist, EU nations exhibit lower within-country score dispersion, pointing to greater internal equity. The study concludes with policy recommendations aimed at narrowing these gaps, including refining immigrant screening mechanisms, enhancing teacher preparation in multicultural education, and reforming early tracking systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145925716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-30DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101557
Alexandra Cheah , Kimberley Kong , Jean Anne Heng , Katharina Ereky-Stevens , Iram Siraj
Despite the growing global presence of refugee populations, few validated tools exist to assess early learning and development in these contexts. This study examined the use of the International Development and Early Learning Assessment (IDELA) with a large sample of 1033 refugee children aged 4–6 years living in Malaysia, a non-resettlement, low- to middle-income country. Using Rasch modelling, we evaluated the psychometric properties of IDELA and found strong person and item reliability, acceptable item fit, and good evidence of unidimensionality, although some item redundancy was observed. Further, children's school readiness scores were significantly associated with child gender and age, as well as maternal and paternal demographic characteristics (age, education, literacy), but not father employment or occupation type. These findings provide preliminary validation for IDELA’s use in refugee settings and underscore its potential as a culturally adaptable, low-cost tool for assessing development in underserved populations.
{"title":"Assessing school readiness domains in a large cohort of refugee children: Validation and links with family factors","authors":"Alexandra Cheah , Kimberley Kong , Jean Anne Heng , Katharina Ereky-Stevens , Iram Siraj","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101557","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101557","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the growing global presence of refugee populations, few validated tools exist to assess early learning and development in these contexts. This study examined the use of the International Development and Early Learning Assessment (IDELA) with a large sample of 1033 refugee children aged 4–6 years living in Malaysia, a non-resettlement, low- to middle-income country. Using Rasch modelling, we evaluated the psychometric properties of IDELA and found strong person and item reliability, acceptable item fit, and good evidence of unidimensionality, although some item redundancy was observed. Further, children's school readiness scores were significantly associated with child gender and age, as well as maternal and paternal demographic characteristics (age, education, literacy), but not father employment or occupation type. These findings provide preliminary validation for IDELA’s use in refugee settings and underscore its potential as a culturally adaptable, low-cost tool for assessing development in underserved populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145884394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101554
Elpis Grammatikopoulou
The aim of this study was to investigate and compare how two reading assessments measured in Grade 4 predict later school grades. Specifically, the study explored how paper-based and digital reading scores were related to school grades in Grades 6 and 9. Data from the international assessment PIRLS 2016 and its digital counterpart ePIRLS 2016, along with Swedish register data were used. Regression results speak to the lasting effects of early reading achievement on later achievement in various subjects. Notably, digital test scores showed stronger associations with later grades, particularly in Grade 6. Although moderate in strength, the predictive validity of digital test scores was higher for subjects like English and mathematics, compared to paper-based test scores. These findings lend some credibility to the ongoing transition to digital assessment, indicating that digital reading measures may capture skills more relevant to later academic success.
{"title":"The predictive validity of PIRLS and ePIRLS on later academic achievement: Insights from Sweden,","authors":"Elpis Grammatikopoulou","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101554","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101554","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this study was to investigate and compare how two reading assessments measured in Grade 4 predict later school grades. Specifically, the study explored how paper-based and digital reading scores were related to school grades in Grades 6 and 9. Data from the international assessment PIRLS 2016 and its digital counterpart ePIRLS 2016, along with Swedish register data were used. Regression results speak to the lasting effects of early reading achievement on later achievement in various subjects. Notably, digital test scores showed stronger associations with later grades, particularly in Grade 6. Although moderate in strength, the predictive validity of digital test scores was higher for subjects like English and mathematics, compared to paper-based test scores. These findings lend some credibility to the ongoing transition to digital assessment, indicating that digital reading measures may capture skills more relevant to later academic success.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145790393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101555
Nurullah Eryilmaz , Mehmet Şükrü Bellibaş , Izhak Berkovich
This study investigates international trends in distributed leadership and teacher job satisfaction, using data from the 2013 and 2018 cycles of the OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey. Focusing on countries that participated in both waves, the study addresses two key aims: (1) to examine cross-national changes in mean levels of teacher job satisfaction, both with the profession and the workplace, between 2013 and 2018, and to assess the statistical significance of these changes; and (2) to explore whether the strength of the relationship between distributed leadership and the two dimensions of job satisfaction has changed over time, and whether these changes varied significantly across countries. The findings revealed a significant overall decline in both aspects of teacher satisfaction from 2013 to 2018, with varying results across countries. However, the decline was larger for teacher satisfaction with the profession. We also found that although the overall association between distributed leadership and job satisfaction with the work environment remained largely stable, the overall relationship between distributed leadership and job satisfaction with the profession showed a slight decline; this change was not statistically significant. We conclude that leadership remains a crucial driver of teacher job satisfaction.
{"title":"Distributed leadership and teacher job satisfaction over time: A large-scale trend analysis of TALIS 2013 and 2018","authors":"Nurullah Eryilmaz , Mehmet Şükrü Bellibaş , Izhak Berkovich","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101555","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101555","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates international trends in distributed leadership and teacher job satisfaction, using data from the 2013 and 2018 cycles of the OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey. Focusing on countries that participated in both waves, the study addresses two key aims: (1) to examine cross-national changes in mean levels of teacher job satisfaction, both with the profession and the workplace, between 2013 and 2018, and to assess the statistical significance of these changes; and (2) to explore whether the strength of the relationship between distributed leadership and the two dimensions of job satisfaction has changed over time, and whether these changes varied significantly across countries. The findings revealed a significant overall decline in both aspects of teacher satisfaction from 2013 to 2018, with varying results across countries. However, the decline was larger for teacher satisfaction with the profession. We also found that although the overall association between distributed leadership and job satisfaction with the work environment remained largely stable, the overall relationship between distributed leadership and job satisfaction with the profession showed a slight decline; this change was not statistically significant. We conclude that leadership remains a crucial driver of teacher job satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101555"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145737674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101553
Zhifei Li , Shuaixing Xu , Xin Zhao , Hongbo Wen
The evaluation of learning efficiency is important for educational research. Previous studies have insufficiently defined its connotation, leading to incomparable results. Therefore, defining learning efficiency and improving assessment methods are crucial. This study examined the double reference point (DRP) method in assessing learning efficiency using PISA 2018 data. Firstly, we construct a comprehensive index for learning efficiency. Secondly, the validity of learning efficiency index based on the DRP method is established by conducting group difference tests on key indicators, comparing the results with traditional learning efficiency metrics, and examining its relationship with achievement motivation. Thirdly, by altering the weights of indicators, reference levels, and synthesis parameters, the robustness of learning efficiency index with DRP method is verified. The results indicate the double reference point method is suitable for learning efficiency evaluation, and offers support for precisely and scientifically improving student efficiency.
{"title":"Development and implementation of learning efficiency evaluation model: Using the double reference point method","authors":"Zhifei Li , Shuaixing Xu , Xin Zhao , Hongbo Wen","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101553","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101553","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The evaluation of learning efficiency is important for educational research. Previous studies have insufficiently defined its connotation, leading to incomparable results. Therefore, defining learning efficiency and improving assessment methods are crucial. This study examined the double reference point (DRP) method in assessing learning efficiency using PISA 2018 data. Firstly, we construct a comprehensive index for learning efficiency. Secondly, the validity of learning efficiency index based on the DRP method is established by conducting group difference tests on key indicators, comparing the results with traditional learning efficiency metrics, and examining its relationship with achievement motivation. Thirdly, by altering the weights of indicators, reference levels, and synthesis parameters, the robustness of learning efficiency index with DRP method is verified. The results indicate the double reference point method is suitable for learning efficiency evaluation, and offers support for precisely and scientifically improving student efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101553"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145737675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101552
Johan Braeken , Anne-Catherine Lehre , Kseniia Marcq
International large-scale assessments (ILSA) in education generate a lot of interest and debate among researchers and stakeholders alike. In this study, we take a deep-dive into a provocative claim that “Nordic students cannot do fractions” based on an item-specific result in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2011. Using item response data from five cycles of the TIMSS mathematics achievement test, spanning from 2003 to 2019, across 12 countries representing diverse geographical regions (Africa, Europe, East Asia, and North America) and proficiency levels (from lower-performers to higher-performers), including about 54000 students per cycle and a total of about 800 mathematics items, we investigated the empirical basis and generalizability of the stated claim using an explanatory item response model (IRT) approach. Our study underscores the dangers of miscommunication, oversimplification, and overgeneralization of ILSA results, yet also highlights the hidden potential of deeper item-level analyses for educational researchers and stakeholders to generate critical inquiries into educational practice and our understanding of the subject domain.
{"title":"Pearls and perils when interpreting item-specific results from international large-scale educational assessments: The case of the “Nordic” fractions","authors":"Johan Braeken , Anne-Catherine Lehre , Kseniia Marcq","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101552","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101552","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>International large-scale assessments (ILSA) in education generate a lot of interest and debate among researchers and stakeholders alike. In this study, we take a deep-dive into a provocative claim that “Nordic students cannot do fractions” based on an item-specific result in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2011. Using item response data from five cycles of the TIMSS mathematics achievement test, spanning from 2003 to 2019, across 12 countries representing diverse geographical regions (Africa, Europe, East Asia, and North America) and proficiency levels (from lower-performers to higher-performers), including about 54000 students per cycle and a total of about 800 mathematics items, we investigated the empirical basis and generalizability of the stated claim using an explanatory item response model (IRT) approach. Our study underscores the dangers of miscommunication, oversimplification, and overgeneralization of ILSA results, yet also highlights the hidden potential of deeper item-level analyses for educational researchers and stakeholders to generate critical inquiries into educational practice and our understanding of the subject domain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145737673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101542
Mahmoud Emam , Laila Z. Al-Salmi , Wafaa Mohammed Moawad Abd-El-Aal , Adel Hemdan
This study investigates how teacher knowledge and attitudes toward inclusive education are associated with student outcomes, with inclusive school climate serving as a mediating mechanism. Drawing on data from 143 teachers and 2747 students across 31 Omani public schools, a multilevel structural equation modeling (MSEM) approach was used to assess cross-level effects. The findings reveal that both teacher knowledge and attitudes are associated with perceptions of inclusive school climate, which in turn is associated with student attitudes and experiences of inclusion. The study supports the view that that inclusive education is co-constructed across individual and institutional levels and underscores the pivotal role of school climate in linking teacher dispositions with student-level equity outcomes. Implications are discussed for teacher training, leadership development, and systemic reform in Oman and similar contexts. These results highlight the importance of building inclusive school environments that align teacher readiness with student inclusion, advancing equity-oriented educational practice.
{"title":"Evaluating inclusive school practices: A multilevel analysis of teacher readiness, climate, and student outcomes","authors":"Mahmoud Emam , Laila Z. Al-Salmi , Wafaa Mohammed Moawad Abd-El-Aal , Adel Hemdan","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101542","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101542","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how teacher knowledge and attitudes toward inclusive education are associated with student outcomes, with inclusive school climate serving as a mediating mechanism. Drawing on data from 143 teachers and 2747 students across 31 Omani public schools, a multilevel structural equation modeling (MSEM) approach was used to assess cross-level effects. The findings reveal that both teacher knowledge and attitudes are associated with perceptions of inclusive school climate, which in turn is associated with student attitudes and experiences of inclusion. The study supports the view that that inclusive education is co-constructed across individual and institutional levels and underscores the pivotal role of school climate in linking teacher dispositions with student-level equity outcomes. Implications are discussed for teacher training, leadership development, and systemic reform in Oman and similar contexts. These results highlight the importance of building inclusive school environments that align teacher readiness with student inclusion, advancing equity-oriented educational practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101542"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145685295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101539
Zitong Huang , Yiyao Yang , Yasemin Gulbahar
Mathematics performance remains a critical indicator of educational equity and academic preparedness in an increasingly datadriven world. This study examined factors affecting math achievement in New York City from 2013-2023, analyzing 3395,816 student records from Grades 3-8 using NYC OpenData. Clustering analysis revealed two distinct performance trajectories, with higher-scoring clusters linked to periods of targeted intervention and policy reform, while declines corresponded with structural disadvantage and postpandemic disruptions. Outlier analysis showed substantial shifts in performance levels following grading policy changes, underscoring the impact of systemic reforms. Results revealed persistent achievement gaps of 1.8–2.4 standard deviations across socioeconomic status, disability status, and English Language Learner groups. Ridge regression identified English proficiency, disability status, and economic disadvantage as the strongest predictors of math achievement. These findings highlight the need for longterm, context-sensitive educational strategies that address persistent inequities through both instructional and systemic interventions.
{"title":"Understanding the interconnected drivers of mathematics test performance: a longitudinal study","authors":"Zitong Huang , Yiyao Yang , Yasemin Gulbahar","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101539","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101539","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mathematics performance remains a critical indicator of educational equity and academic preparedness in an increasingly datadriven world. This study examined factors affecting math achievement in New York City from 2013-2023, analyzing 3395,816 student records from Grades 3-8 using NYC OpenData. Clustering analysis revealed two distinct performance trajectories, with higher-scoring clusters linked to periods of targeted intervention and policy reform, while declines corresponded with structural disadvantage and postpandemic disruptions. Outlier analysis showed substantial shifts in performance levels following grading policy changes, underscoring the impact of systemic reforms. Results revealed persistent achievement gaps of 1.8–2.4 standard deviations across socioeconomic status, disability status, and English Language Learner groups. Ridge regression identified English proficiency, disability status, and economic disadvantage as the strongest predictors of math achievement. These findings highlight the need for longterm, context-sensitive educational strategies that address persistent inequities through both instructional and systemic interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145685297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101544
Hans Luyten
This study examines the association between the gender composition of the teaching profession and gender achievement gaps across countries. It explores to what extent girls outperform boys in countries with a higher percentage of female teachers in secondary education. Using PISA 2022 data on 15-year-olds’ performance in reading, mathematics, and science, combined with labor force statistics, the analysis reveals a pattern in which gender achievement gaps covary with the degree of overrepresentation of female teachers relative to the proportion of women in the labor force. In countries where this overrepresentation is more pronounced, girls tend to show greater academic advantages over boys. This pattern appears to reflect broader societal dynamics not captured by studies focusing on classroom environments.
{"title":"Overrepresentation of female teachers in secondary education and gender achievement gaps in PISA 2022","authors":"Hans Luyten","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101544","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101544","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the association between the gender composition of the teaching profession and gender achievement gaps across countries. It explores to what extent girls outperform boys in countries with a higher percentage of female teachers in secondary education. Using PISA 2022 data on 15-year-olds’ performance in reading, mathematics, and science, combined with labor force statistics, the analysis reveals a pattern in which gender achievement gaps covary with the degree of overrepresentation of female teachers relative to the proportion of women in the labor force. In countries where this overrepresentation is more pronounced, girls tend to show greater academic advantages over boys. This pattern appears to reflect broader societal dynamics not captured by studies focusing on classroom environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101544"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145685296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101543
Ramazan Özkul , Mahmut Polatcan , Mehmet Fatih Karacabey , Mehmet Şükrü Bellibaş
Growing school- and classroom-based disciplinary problems pose a challenge across education systems worldwide, yet little is known about how multiple stakeholders, including principals, teachers, and parents, interact to address these issues. This study examined the role of transformational leadership, shared decision-making, parental involvement, and teacher classroom management self-efficacy in predicting school and classroom discipline. We used a dataset involving 573 teachers collected from a city in Türkiye and employed structural equation modeling to explore these relationships. The findings reveal that transformational leadership was positively associated with both shared decision-making and parental involvement and shared decision-making was related to parental engagement, teacher self-efficacy, and school discipline. Although parental involvement was positively associated with teacher self-efficacy, it was indirectly related to classroom discipline mediated through self-efficacy, which was critical for classroom discipline. The association between leadership and classroom discipline was mediated through shared decision-making, parental involvement, school discipline, and teacher self-efficacy.
{"title":"Fostering school and classroom discipline in Türkiye: Leadership, shared decision-making, parental involvement and teacher self-efficacy","authors":"Ramazan Özkul , Mahmut Polatcan , Mehmet Fatih Karacabey , Mehmet Şükrü Bellibaş","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101543","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101543","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Growing school- and classroom-based disciplinary problems pose a challenge across education systems worldwide, yet little is known about how multiple stakeholders, including principals, teachers, and parents, interact to address these issues. This study examined the role of transformational leadership, shared decision-making, parental involvement, and teacher classroom management self-efficacy in predicting school and classroom discipline. We used a dataset involving 573 teachers collected from a city in Türkiye and employed structural equation modeling to explore these relationships. The findings reveal that transformational leadership was positively associated with both shared decision-making and parental involvement and shared decision-making was related to parental engagement, teacher self-efficacy, and school discipline. Although parental involvement was positively associated with teacher self-efficacy, it was indirectly related to classroom discipline mediated through self-efficacy, which was critical for classroom discipline. The association between leadership and classroom discipline was mediated through shared decision-making, parental involvement, school discipline, and teacher self-efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 101543"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145684114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}