Academic instruction librarians' feelings of job control: Quantitative analysis of responses to a job control inventory

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Academic Librarianship Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102835
Matthew Weirick Johnson
{"title":"Academic instruction librarians' feelings of job control: Quantitative analysis of responses to a job control inventory","authors":"Matthew Weirick Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Job control encompasses a range of dimensions that reflect the extent to which employees have the freedom and discretion to make decisions about their work. Job control includes control over tasks, scheduling, work pacing, physical environment, decision-making, interaction, and mobility. A web survey was administered to academic librarians with instruction responsibilities. The survey included a previously developed scale for measuring job control and several key demographic and job characteristic questions that were hypothesized to impact job control. 307 academic instruction librarians completed the job control scale. Analyzing each item in the job control scale, teaching workload, status, income, years at institution and in libraries, teacher training, union representation, and tenure status have statistically significant effects on responses to at least one question in the scale. Through analysis of the average response among academic instruction librarians in the sample, control over decision-making, including allocation of resources and salaries, and interactions appear to be two places where managers and library leaders may focus improvements. Control over the amount of money academic instruction librarians earn and over how their work is evaluated were the lowest across the 22 items in the job control scale. As library leaders and managers consider the practical implications of job control research on their work, earnings, evaluation processes, and interactions or interruptions may be key areas to enact changes or provide further transparency and shared decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009913332300174X/pdfft?md5=74995544d4a8fab8c54594c8a67477e4&pid=1-s2.0-S009913332300174X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009913332300174X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Job control encompasses a range of dimensions that reflect the extent to which employees have the freedom and discretion to make decisions about their work. Job control includes control over tasks, scheduling, work pacing, physical environment, decision-making, interaction, and mobility. A web survey was administered to academic librarians with instruction responsibilities. The survey included a previously developed scale for measuring job control and several key demographic and job characteristic questions that were hypothesized to impact job control. 307 academic instruction librarians completed the job control scale. Analyzing each item in the job control scale, teaching workload, status, income, years at institution and in libraries, teacher training, union representation, and tenure status have statistically significant effects on responses to at least one question in the scale. Through analysis of the average response among academic instruction librarians in the sample, control over decision-making, including allocation of resources and salaries, and interactions appear to be two places where managers and library leaders may focus improvements. Control over the amount of money academic instruction librarians earn and over how their work is evaluated were the lowest across the 22 items in the job control scale. As library leaders and managers consider the practical implications of job control research on their work, earnings, evaluation processes, and interactions or interruptions may be key areas to enact changes or provide further transparency and shared decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术指导图书馆员的工作控制感:对工作控制清单答复的定量分析
工作控制包括一系列方面,反映了员工在多大程度上可以自由和酌情对其工作做出决定。工作控制包括对任务、时间安排、工作节奏、物理环境、决策、互动和流动性的控制。我们对承担教学任务的学术图书馆员进行了一项网络调查。调查内容包括之前开发的用于衡量工作控制力的量表,以及几个假设会影响工作控制力的关键人口统计和工作特征问题。307 名学术指导图书馆员填写了工作控制量表。对工作控制量表中的每个项目进行分析,发现教学工作量、地位、收入、在学校和图书馆工作的年限、教师培训、工会代表和终身任职状况对量表中至少一个问题的回答有显著的统计学影响。通过分析样本中学术指导图书馆员的平均回答,对决策(包括资源分配和工资)的控制以及 互动似乎是管理者和图书馆领导可以重点改进的两个方面。在工作控制量表的 22 个项目中,对学术指导图书馆员收入金额的控制和对其工作评估方式的控制是最低的。当图书馆领导者和管理者考虑工作控制研究对其工作的实际影响时,收入、评估过程、互动或干扰可能是制定变革或提供进一步透明度和共同决策的关键领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
期刊最新文献
Understanding feelings, thoughts, and actions: Social work students and individual research consultations Growth of Knowledge Synthesis in a University Setting: Types, Disciplines, and Librarian Involvement An interdisciplinary assessment of information literacy instruction A holistic approach to understanding undergraduates: Campus engagement, library use and psychological factors The lifecycle of 3D data in academic libraries: A survey of methods and implications for information professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1