Relationships between physical activity and loneliness: A systematic review of intervention studies

Jeesung Ahn , Emily B. Falk , Yoona Kang
{"title":"Relationships between physical activity and loneliness: A systematic review of intervention studies","authors":"Jeesung Ahn ,&nbsp;Emily B. Falk ,&nbsp;Yoona Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.crbeha.2023.100141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Loneliness and physical inactivity are serious public health issues that often co-occur. However, they are often treated separately. Our systematic review aimed to identify components of interventions that most effectively improve physical inactivity and/or loneliness and whether/how these two variables are related. Specifically, we tested the following questions: 1) whether interventions focused on physical inactivity alleviate loneliness; 2) whether interventions focused on loneliness increase physical activity; 3) whether interventions that target broader levels of physical and mental well-being improve both loneliness and physical activity. We further examined 4) common intervention components that influenced loneliness and/or physical activity, with a particular focus on social components of each intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched for peer-reviewed journal articles published before May 22nd, 2022 in PubMed Plus, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, and Embase. Both quantitative and qualitative studies that investigated the effects of interventions on physical activity and/or loneliness were included for review. Risk of bias was assessed for each study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 34 papers, including 27 studies examining the effects of physical activity interventions, one study explicitly targeting loneliness, and six studies targeting broader subjective well-being. Studies showed mixed results and a high heterogeneity in intervention design and sample characteristics. Overall, we found group exercise, individualized consultation and education on physical activity, and social support-building during physical activity (<em>vs</em>. other social activities) as promising intervention components that were frequently associated with improvements in physical activity and loneliness.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This review highlights that interventions targeting physical activity can also alleviate loneliness. Improved social experiences from such interventions may explain this hidden benefit. Limited data were available to conclusively answer whether physical activity and loneliness bi-directionally influence each other. More research is needed to systematically test the impact of different social components built into physical activity interventions on loneliness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72746,"journal":{"name":"Current research in behavioral sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518223000451/pdfft?md5=10e1b61dba9034e780aba37de3e70ef7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666518223000451-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in behavioral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518223000451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Loneliness and physical inactivity are serious public health issues that often co-occur. However, they are often treated separately. Our systematic review aimed to identify components of interventions that most effectively improve physical inactivity and/or loneliness and whether/how these two variables are related. Specifically, we tested the following questions: 1) whether interventions focused on physical inactivity alleviate loneliness; 2) whether interventions focused on loneliness increase physical activity; 3) whether interventions that target broader levels of physical and mental well-being improve both loneliness and physical activity. We further examined 4) common intervention components that influenced loneliness and/or physical activity, with a particular focus on social components of each intervention.

Methods

We searched for peer-reviewed journal articles published before May 22nd, 2022 in PubMed Plus, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, and Embase. Both quantitative and qualitative studies that investigated the effects of interventions on physical activity and/or loneliness were included for review. Risk of bias was assessed for each study.

Results

We identified 34 papers, including 27 studies examining the effects of physical activity interventions, one study explicitly targeting loneliness, and six studies targeting broader subjective well-being. Studies showed mixed results and a high heterogeneity in intervention design and sample characteristics. Overall, we found group exercise, individualized consultation and education on physical activity, and social support-building during physical activity (vs. other social activities) as promising intervention components that were frequently associated with improvements in physical activity and loneliness.

Conclusion

This review highlights that interventions targeting physical activity can also alleviate loneliness. Improved social experiences from such interventions may explain this hidden benefit. Limited data were available to conclusively answer whether physical activity and loneliness bi-directionally influence each other. More research is needed to systematically test the impact of different social components built into physical activity interventions on loneliness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育锻炼与孤独之间的关系:干预研究的系统回顾
目标孤独和缺乏运动是严重的公共健康问题,两者往往同时存在。然而,这两个问题往往被分开处理。我们的系统综述旨在确定能最有效改善缺乏运动和/或孤独感的干预措施的组成部分,以及这两个变量是否/如何相关。具体来说,我们测试了以下问题:1)针对缺乏运动的干预措施是否能缓解孤独感;2)针对孤独感的干预措施是否能增加体育锻炼;3)针对更广泛的身心健康水平的干预措施是否能同时改善孤独感和体育锻炼。我们进一步研究了 4) 影响孤独感和/或体育锻炼的常见干预措施,尤其关注每种干预措施的社会因素。方法我们在 PubMed Plus、Scopus、Web of Science、ScienceDirect、EBSCO 和 Embase 中检索了 2022 年 5 月 22 日之前发表的同行评审期刊文章。调查干预措施对体育锻炼和/或孤独感影响的定量和定性研究均被纳入审查范围。结果我们发现了 34 篇论文,其中 27 篇研究了体育锻炼干预措施的效果,1 篇研究明确针对孤独感,6 篇研究针对更广泛的主观幸福感。研究结果参差不齐,干预设计和样本特征的异质性很高。总体而言,我们发现集体锻炼、个性化的体育锻炼咨询和教育以及在体育锻炼过程中建立社会支持(相对于其他社会活动)是很有前景的干预内容,这些内容经常与体育锻炼和孤独感的改善相关联。这些干预措施所带来的社交体验的改善可能是这种隐性益处的原因。由于数据有限,因此无法明确回答体育锻炼和孤独感是否会双向影响彼此。需要进行更多的研究,系统地测试体育锻炼干预措施中不同的社会因素对孤独感的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current research in behavioral sciences
Current research in behavioral sciences Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents The causal role of numerical and non-numerical order processing abilities in the early development of mathematics skills: Evidence from an intervention study Discrete memories of a continuous world: A working memory perspective on event segmentation Relationships between physical activity and loneliness: A systematic review of intervention studies Do narcissists possess a sense of purpose? Purpose-in-life and narcissism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1