Does micro-granulated yeast probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation in milk replacer affect health, growth, feed efficiency and economic gain of calves?

IF 1.9 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Veterinary and Animal Science Pub Date : 2023-12-23 DOI:10.1016/j.vas.2023.100329
Nizar Salah , Héloïse Legendre , Valentin Nenov , Maxime Briche , Flore Serieys , Silvia Grossi , Carlo Angelo Sgoifo Rossi
{"title":"Does micro-granulated yeast probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation in milk replacer affect health, growth, feed efficiency and economic gain of calves?","authors":"Nizar Salah ,&nbsp;Héloïse Legendre ,&nbsp;Valentin Nenov ,&nbsp;Maxime Briche ,&nbsp;Flore Serieys ,&nbsp;Silvia Grossi ,&nbsp;Carlo Angelo Sgoifo Rossi","doi":"10.1016/j.vas.2023.100329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The goal of calf feeding systems is to provide calves with optimum nutrition to promote growth, health, and future milk production and to reduce antibiotic use which leads to a need for alternatives that reduce illness and promote growth in dairy calves. We hypothesized that feeding live yeast would improve gastrointestinal health and growth performance of calves. The aim of this study was then to evaluate the effects of supplementing a yeast probiotic <em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em> (CNCM I-4407, 10<sup>10</sup> CFU/g, Actisaf® Sc47 powder; Phileo by Lesaffre, France) in milk replacers (MR), on health and growth of pre-weaned calves. Forty Holstein female calves were used during this trial. Each calf was weighed at 3 days of age and then introduced in the trial. Calves were randomly assigned to 2 groups (<em>n</em> = 20/group) and were fed MR without (control; CON) or with yeast probiotic at 1 g/calf/d (experimental; EXP). Milk replacer (12.5 % solids) was offered twice a day until 66 days of age (DOA). Body Weight (BW), wither height, hip width, body length and chest girth were collected in day 3 and day 66. Compared to CON, calves supplemented with yeast probiotic had better average daily gain (ADG, 0.456 ± 0.1 <em>vs.</em> 0.556 ± 0.09 kg/d, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). There was no difference (<em>p &gt;</em>  0.05) in both starter and MR intake between the two groups. Feed efficiency was better (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) in the EXP group (2.18 ± 0.53) compared to CON (2.63 ± 0.78). No statistical differences were found between groups even if the lower total morbidity (40.91 % in the CON vs<em>.</em> 19.05 % in EXP) and incidence of gastrointestinal disorders (36.36 % in the CON vs. 14.29 % in EXP) were observed in calves supplemented with yeast probiotic. The severity of diarrhea was numerically lower in calves supplemented with yeast probiotic. No severe cases of respiratory disorders were highlighted in the present trial. The cost/kg of gain was higher (<em>p &lt;</em>  0.05) in CON compared to EXP group. Total expenses linked to feeds and veterinary treatments were higher in CON compared to EXP group. During the study, the use 1 g/d of yeast probiotic allows to save 32.86 €/calf.</p><p>It could be concluded that supplementing Actisaf® powder (Actisaf® SC 47 PWD) in MR improved health, growth performance, feed efficiency, and reduced the expenses linked to feeds and veterinary treatments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37152,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and Animal Science","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100329"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451943X23000467/pdfft?md5=5d40fba14df0d4d71f13d7dcd5c977e0&pid=1-s2.0-S2451943X23000467-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451943X23000467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of calf feeding systems is to provide calves with optimum nutrition to promote growth, health, and future milk production and to reduce antibiotic use which leads to a need for alternatives that reduce illness and promote growth in dairy calves. We hypothesized that feeding live yeast would improve gastrointestinal health and growth performance of calves. The aim of this study was then to evaluate the effects of supplementing a yeast probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae (CNCM I-4407, 1010 CFU/g, Actisaf® Sc47 powder; Phileo by Lesaffre, France) in milk replacers (MR), on health and growth of pre-weaned calves. Forty Holstein female calves were used during this trial. Each calf was weighed at 3 days of age and then introduced in the trial. Calves were randomly assigned to 2 groups (n = 20/group) and were fed MR without (control; CON) or with yeast probiotic at 1 g/calf/d (experimental; EXP). Milk replacer (12.5 % solids) was offered twice a day until 66 days of age (DOA). Body Weight (BW), wither height, hip width, body length and chest girth were collected in day 3 and day 66. Compared to CON, calves supplemented with yeast probiotic had better average daily gain (ADG, 0.456 ± 0.1 vs. 0.556 ± 0.09 kg/d, p < 0.05). There was no difference (p >  0.05) in both starter and MR intake between the two groups. Feed efficiency was better (p < 0.05) in the EXP group (2.18 ± 0.53) compared to CON (2.63 ± 0.78). No statistical differences were found between groups even if the lower total morbidity (40.91 % in the CON vs. 19.05 % in EXP) and incidence of gastrointestinal disorders (36.36 % in the CON vs. 14.29 % in EXP) were observed in calves supplemented with yeast probiotic. The severity of diarrhea was numerically lower in calves supplemented with yeast probiotic. No severe cases of respiratory disorders were highlighted in the present trial. The cost/kg of gain was higher (p <  0.05) in CON compared to EXP group. Total expenses linked to feeds and veterinary treatments were higher in CON compared to EXP group. During the study, the use 1 g/d of yeast probiotic allows to save 32.86 €/calf.

It could be concluded that supplementing Actisaf® powder (Actisaf® SC 47 PWD) in MR improved health, growth performance, feed efficiency, and reduced the expenses linked to feeds and veterinary treatments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在代乳粉中添加微粒化酵母益生菌(酿酒酵母)会影响犊牛的健康、生长、饲料效率和经济收益吗?
犊牛饲养系统的目标是为犊牛提供最佳营养,以促进其生长、健康和未来的产奶量,并减少抗生素的使用,因此需要能减少乳牛疾病和促进其生长的替代品。我们假设,饲喂活酵母可改善犊牛的胃肠道健康和生长性能。因此,本研究的目的是评估在代乳粉(MR)中添加酵母益生菌酿酒酵母(CNCM I-4407,1010 CFU/g,Actisaf® Sc47 粉;法国 Phileo by Lesaffre)对断奶前犊牛健康和生长的影响。本次试验使用了 40 头荷斯坦雌性犊牛。每头犊牛在 3 日龄时称重,然后引入试验。犊牛被随机分配到两组(n = 20/组),分别饲喂不含酵母益生菌的 MR(对照组;CON)或含酵母益生菌的 MR(实验组;EXP),每头犊牛 1 克/天。代乳品(含固形物 12.5%)每天供应两次,直至 66 日龄(DOA)。在第 3 天和第 66 天收集体重(BW)、枯萎病牛身高、臀宽、体长和胸围。与对照组相比,添加酵母益生菌的犊牛平均日增重更高(ADG, 0.456 ± 0.1 vs. 0.556 ± 0.09 kg/d, p <0.05)。两组的开食量和MR摄入量没有差异(p > 0.05)。与 CON 组(2.63 ± 0.78)相比,EXP 组(2.18 ± 0.53)的饲料效率更高(p < 0.05)。尽管补充酵母益生菌的犊牛总发病率(CON 组为 40.91 %,EXP 组为 19.05 %)和胃肠道疾病发病率(CON 组为 36.36 %,EXP 组为 14.29 %)较低,但两组之间未发现统计学差异。添加酵母益生菌的犊牛腹泻严重程度较低。本试验未发现严重的呼吸道疾病病例。与 EXP 组相比,CON 组每公斤增重的成本更高(p < 0.05)。与 EXP 组相比,CON 组的饲料和兽医治疗总费用更高。可以得出的结论是,在 MR 中添加 Actisaf® 粉剂(Actisaf® SC 47 PWD)可改善健康状况、提高生长性能和饲料效率,并减少与饲料和兽医治疗相关的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary and Animal Science
Veterinary and Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
A systematic review and meta-analysis of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia in Ethiopian cattle Does transport affect the eating quality potential of beef from Limousin cows in France? - A case study Comparison of two methods of extracting bull epididymal spermatozoa Cattle, sheep, and goat humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 Effect of vaccine diluents on the colonization of Salmonella Typhimurium vaccine in chickens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1