Asymmetric effects of economic policy uncertainty on demand for money in developed countries

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Economic Asymmetries Pub Date : 2024-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00350
Salah A. Nusair , Dennis Olson , Jamal A. Al-Khasawneh
{"title":"Asymmetric effects of economic policy uncertainty on demand for money in developed countries","authors":"Salah A. Nusair ,&nbsp;Dennis Olson ,&nbsp;Jamal A. Al-Khasawneh","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This paper examines the asymmetric effects of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on the demand for money in Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. We use linear and nonlinear ARDL models with monthly data over the period 1985–2022 to conduct the analysis. Results from the linear </span>ARDL model show that changes in EPU have no short-run or long-run effect on money demand in any country, except in the US, where changes in EPU have a positive short-run effect. However, with the nonlinear ARDL model, we find evidence of short-run and long-run effects across all four countries. Both increases and decreases in EPU have negative long-run effects on Canadian and UK money demand, but a positive effect on US money demand. For Japan, rising EPU has a positive effect on money demand, whereas falling EPU is insignificant. The long-run results are consistent in each country over time. The recent COVID-19 period had a short-run impact across countries and a long-run effect on the relationship between EPU and money demand in Canada and the UK. In contrast, the Brexit period had no differential long-run impact on money demand across countries, and a short run impact was only observed in the UK. Our results highlight the importance of adopting nonlinear ARDL models instead of linear models to analyze money demand and the need to examine countries separately since the long-run effects of EPU on money demand vary across countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article e00350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1703494923000622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the asymmetric effects of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on the demand for money in Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. We use linear and nonlinear ARDL models with monthly data over the period 1985–2022 to conduct the analysis. Results from the linear ARDL model show that changes in EPU have no short-run or long-run effect on money demand in any country, except in the US, where changes in EPU have a positive short-run effect. However, with the nonlinear ARDL model, we find evidence of short-run and long-run effects across all four countries. Both increases and decreases in EPU have negative long-run effects on Canadian and UK money demand, but a positive effect on US money demand. For Japan, rising EPU has a positive effect on money demand, whereas falling EPU is insignificant. The long-run results are consistent in each country over time. The recent COVID-19 period had a short-run impact across countries and a long-run effect on the relationship between EPU and money demand in Canada and the UK. In contrast, the Brexit period had no differential long-run impact on money demand across countries, and a short run impact was only observed in the UK. Our results highlight the importance of adopting nonlinear ARDL models instead of linear models to analyze money demand and the need to examine countries separately since the long-run effects of EPU on money demand vary across countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济政策不确定性对发达国家货币需求的不对称影响
本文研究了经济政策不确定性(EPU)对加拿大、日本、英国和美国货币需求的非对称影响。我们使用线性和非线性 ARDL 模型以及 1985-2022 年期间的月度数据进行分析。线性 ARDL 模型的结果显示,EPU 的变化对任何国家的货币需求都没有短期或长期影响,只有美国例外,EPU 的变化对美国的货币需求有积极的短期影响。然而,通过非线性 ARDL 模型,我们发现所有四个国家都存在短期和长期影响。EPU的上升和下降对加拿大和英国的货币需求都有负面的长期影响,但对美国的货币需求有正面影响。就日本而言,EPU 的上升对货币需求有积极影响,而 EPU 的下降则不显著。各国的长期结果在不同时期是一致的。最近的 COVID-19 期间对各国产生了短期影响,对加拿大和英国的 EPU 与货币需求之间的关系产生了长期影响。相比之下,英国脱欧时期对各国的货币需求没有不同的长期影响,仅在英国观察到短期影响。我们的研究结果凸显了采用非线性 ARDL 模型而非线性模型分析货币需求的重要性,以及对各国进行单独研究的必要性,因为 EPU 对货币需求的长期影响因国家而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Economic Asymmetries
Journal of Economic Asymmetries Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
From debt arithmetic to fiscal sustainability and fiscal rules: Taking stock and policy lessons Editorial Board Asymmetric distance and business cycles (ΑDBC): A new understanding of distance in international trade models through the example of Iran's trade corridors The asymmetric impact of leisure externalities on economic growth Investigating the asymmetric effects of financial development on trade performance in Africa: Can digitalization, transport services, and regulatory quality drive the vision 2063?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1