Variation in the use of anthropogenic materials in tit nests: influence of human activities and pandemic restrictions

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Urban Ecosystems Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1007/s11252-023-01502-0
Joana Girão, Filipa Bessa, Jorge Garrido-Bautista, Beatriz Ferreira, Carolina Santos-Baena, M. Paula M. Marques, Luís A. E. Batista de Carvalho, Jaime Albino Ramos, Ana Cláudia Norte
{"title":"Variation in the use of anthropogenic materials in tit nests: influence of human activities and pandemic restrictions","authors":"Joana Girão, Filipa Bessa, Jorge Garrido-Bautista, Beatriz Ferreira, Carolina Santos-Baena, M. Paula M. Marques, Luís A. E. Batista de Carvalho, Jaime Albino Ramos, Ana Cláudia Norte","doi":"10.1007/s11252-023-01502-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As urbanization expands, so does the presence of anthropogenic materials within bird’s nests. However, our understanding of this phenomenon remains limited, particularly in terrestrial birds. This study describes and compares the use of anthropogenic materials in great tit (<i>Parus major</i>) and blue tit (<i>Cyanistes caeruleus</i>) nests in relation to the intensity of anthropogenic activities, distance to contamination sources and reproductive metrics, in nest boxes in a suburban wood in Coimbra, Portugal, during the breeding seasons of 2020 and 2021. Nests were collected after fledging and sorted to remove anthropogenic materials. From a total of 9.71% anthropogenic materials in great tit nests we observed an abundance of uncoloured tangles of mixed fibres, representing 78% of the total weight of the anthropogenic materials in great tit nests in 2021. The chemical composition of these mixtures was determined by spectroscopy analysis, using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and 56% of the nests (16/25) contained fibres from synthetic origin. The percentage of anthropogenic materials was higher in great tit than in blue tit nests and increased in 2021, comparatively to 2020. The proximity to potential contamination sources influenced positively the percentage of anthropogenic materials in nests, as those closer to areas with more intense anthropogenic activities (the bar/tennis court and the wastewater treatment plant) had a higher percentage of these materials. No effects on productivity were detected. Our results suggest that the use of these materials is probably related to the intensity of anthropogenic activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48869,"journal":{"name":"Urban Ecosystems","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01502-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As urbanization expands, so does the presence of anthropogenic materials within bird’s nests. However, our understanding of this phenomenon remains limited, particularly in terrestrial birds. This study describes and compares the use of anthropogenic materials in great tit (Parus major) and blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) nests in relation to the intensity of anthropogenic activities, distance to contamination sources and reproductive metrics, in nest boxes in a suburban wood in Coimbra, Portugal, during the breeding seasons of 2020 and 2021. Nests were collected after fledging and sorted to remove anthropogenic materials. From a total of 9.71% anthropogenic materials in great tit nests we observed an abundance of uncoloured tangles of mixed fibres, representing 78% of the total weight of the anthropogenic materials in great tit nests in 2021. The chemical composition of these mixtures was determined by spectroscopy analysis, using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and 56% of the nests (16/25) contained fibres from synthetic origin. The percentage of anthropogenic materials was higher in great tit than in blue tit nests and increased in 2021, comparatively to 2020. The proximity to potential contamination sources influenced positively the percentage of anthropogenic materials in nests, as those closer to areas with more intense anthropogenic activities (the bar/tennis court and the wastewater treatment plant) had a higher percentage of these materials. No effects on productivity were detected. Our results suggest that the use of these materials is probably related to the intensity of anthropogenic activities.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
山雀巢中人为材料使用的变化:人类活动和流行限制的影响
随着城市化进程的扩大,鸟巢中的人为材料也在不断增加。然而,我们对这一现象的了解仍然有限,尤其是在陆生鸟类中。本研究描述并比较了 2020 年和 2021 年繁殖季节期间,葡萄牙科英布拉郊区树林中的巢箱内,大山雀(Parus major)和蓝山雀(Cyanistes caeruleus)巢中人为材料的使用情况,以及与人为活动强度、污染源距离和繁殖指标的关系。雏鸟羽化后收集巢箱并进行分类,以去除人为材料。在大山雀巢中总共9.71%的人为材料中,我们观察到大量无色的混合纤维缠结物,占2021年大山雀巢中人为材料总重量的78%。这些混合物的化学成分是通过傅立叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)进行光谱分析确定的,56%的鸟巢(16/25)含有合成纤维。大山雀巢中人为材料的比例高于蓝山雀,而且 2021 年的比例比 2020 年有所增加。距离潜在污染源的远近对鸟巢中人为材料的比例有积极影响,因为距离人为活动较密集区域(酒吧/网球场和污水处理厂)较近的鸟巢中人为材料的比例较高。我们没有检测到这些材料对生产力的影响。我们的研究结果表明,这些材料的使用可能与人为活动的强度有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Ecosystems
Urban Ecosystems BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Urban Ecosystems is an international journal devoted to scientific investigations of urban environments and the relationships between socioeconomic and ecological structures and processes in urban environments. The scope of the journal is broad, including interactions between urban ecosystems and associated suburban and rural environments. Contributions may span a range of specific subject areas as they may apply to urban environments: biodiversity, biogeochemistry, conservation biology, wildlife and fisheries management, ecosystem ecology, ecosystem services, environmental chemistry, hydrology, landscape architecture, meteorology and climate, policy, population biology, social and human ecology, soil science, and urban planning.
期刊最新文献
Bee community response to multiple stressors along a tropical urban-peri urban gradient Urban scavenging: vertebrates display greater sensitivity to land-cover and garden vegetation cover than invertebrates Soil unsealing in Mediterranean schoolyards: what factors drive ant communities? Wildlife resilience in an urban landscape: understanding land-use impacts in Cape Town The urban in ecology: a quantitative textual analysis of the scientific literature over a century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1