A case study of charitable investment impact assessment

IF 1.5 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1002/nvsm.1830
Kerstin B. Lynam, Howard L. Smith, Sarah M. Wolff, Neill F. Piland
{"title":"A case study of charitable investment impact assessment","authors":"Kerstin B. Lynam,&nbsp;Howard L. Smith,&nbsp;Sarah M. Wolff,&nbsp;Neill F. Piland","doi":"10.1002/nvsm.1830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Pablove Foundation has been raising resources since 2008 to fight childhood cancer by investing in underfunded, cutting-edge pediatric cancer research, and a participatory arts program that improves the lives of children being treated for cancer. Given numerous challenges in determining investment impact, the Foundation created key metrics such as the quality of grant recipients' contributions to the research literature, and the amount of subsequent cancer-related research funding generated. Evaluating the effect of the Foundation's participatory art program has been difficult given the pandemic-driven shift from in-person sessions to virtual classes. Nonetheless, standard client survey feedback suggests that the virtual classes are not only functioning quite well, but also that accessibility is enhanced. It is clear that imaginative thinking is as important in assessment as it is in implementing medical research funding and arts programming. Practical implications of these findings for evaluation/assessment efforts by other foundations, nonprofit organizations, and development staff are examined.</p>","PeriodicalId":100823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nvsm.1830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Pablove Foundation has been raising resources since 2008 to fight childhood cancer by investing in underfunded, cutting-edge pediatric cancer research, and a participatory arts program that improves the lives of children being treated for cancer. Given numerous challenges in determining investment impact, the Foundation created key metrics such as the quality of grant recipients' contributions to the research literature, and the amount of subsequent cancer-related research funding generated. Evaluating the effect of the Foundation's participatory art program has been difficult given the pandemic-driven shift from in-person sessions to virtual classes. Nonetheless, standard client survey feedback suggests that the virtual classes are not only functioning quite well, but also that accessibility is enhanced. It is clear that imaginative thinking is as important in assessment as it is in implementing medical research funding and arts programming. Practical implications of these findings for evaluation/assessment efforts by other foundations, nonprofit organizations, and development staff are examined.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慈善投资影响评估案例研究
帕布罗夫基金会自 2008 年以来一直在筹集资金,通过投资于资金不足的前沿儿科癌症研究和参与式艺术项目来改善接受癌症治疗的儿童的生活,从而与儿童癌症作斗争。鉴于在确定投资影响方面存在诸多挑战,基金会制定了一些关键指标,例如受资助者对研究文献所作贡献的质量,以及随后产生的癌症相关研究资金的数量。由于大流行病的影响,基金会的参与式艺术项目已从面对面课程转变为虚拟课程,因此很难对其效果进行评估。不过,标准的客户调查反馈表明,虚拟课程不仅运作良好,而且还提高了可及性。显然,富有想象力的思维在评估中与在实施医学研究资助和艺术计划中同样重要。本文探讨了这些发现对其他基金会、非营利组织和开发人员的评估工作的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From Corporate Artification to Artification in the Third Sector The Stepwise Artification Process in Luxury Fashion: Strategic Integration With the Arts and Collaboration With Non-Profit Institutions Evolution of the “Hierarchy of Engagement” Model Over a Decade: Examining Social Media Use to Inform, Activate, and Create Community Issue Information Going Beyond Philanthropy: A Dual Process Approach to Examine How Consumers Punish Brand Misanthropy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1