Early Identification of Developmental Language Delay

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Infants & Young Children Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1097/IYC.0000000000000256
C. Wiefferink, Conja Adriaanse, Margot van Denderen, Carla van Schie, N. Uilenburg
{"title":"Early Identification of Developmental Language Delay","authors":"C. Wiefferink, Conja Adriaanse, Margot van Denderen, Carla van Schie, N. Uilenburg","doi":"10.1097/IYC.0000000000000256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the importance of identifying children with developmental language delay, no accurate screening instruments are available for 3-year-olds. The aim of the present study is to compare the accuracy of the General Language Screen (GLS), focusing on receptive and expressive language and intelligibility with the accuracy of the VTO Language Screening Instrument (VTO-LSI)-3-year, focusing on expressive language and intelligibility. We hypothesize that the GLS is more accurate in identifying children with language delay, because it also assesses receptive language. Ninety-seven 3-year-old children were included based on their language screening score at the age of 2. At the age of 3, children were assessed with the VTO-LSI-3-year and the GLS. Diagnostic tests were used as reference tests. The GLS was better than the VTO-LSI-3-year in identifying children with language delay. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the discriminative power showed higher areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the GLS. Moreover, the GLS was better in detecting receptive language concerns. Given these results the GLS may serve as a reliable screening tool, especially for children with receptive problems. Because receptive language problems are persistent, early diagnosis and intervention is very important for these children.","PeriodicalId":47099,"journal":{"name":"Infants & Young Children","volume":"122 14","pages":"36 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infants & Young Children","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the importance of identifying children with developmental language delay, no accurate screening instruments are available for 3-year-olds. The aim of the present study is to compare the accuracy of the General Language Screen (GLS), focusing on receptive and expressive language and intelligibility with the accuracy of the VTO Language Screening Instrument (VTO-LSI)-3-year, focusing on expressive language and intelligibility. We hypothesize that the GLS is more accurate in identifying children with language delay, because it also assesses receptive language. Ninety-seven 3-year-old children were included based on their language screening score at the age of 2. At the age of 3, children were assessed with the VTO-LSI-3-year and the GLS. Diagnostic tests were used as reference tests. The GLS was better than the VTO-LSI-3-year in identifying children with language delay. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the discriminative power showed higher areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the GLS. Moreover, the GLS was better in detecting receptive language concerns. Given these results the GLS may serve as a reliable screening tool, especially for children with receptive problems. Because receptive language problems are persistent, early diagnosis and intervention is very important for these children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言发育迟缓的早期识别
尽管识别语言发育迟缓儿童非常重要,但目前还没有针对 3 岁儿童的准确筛查工具。本研究的目的是比较通用语言筛查(GLS)与 VTO 语言筛查工具(VTO-LSI)-3 年期的准确性,前者侧重于接受语言、表达语言和理解能力,后者侧重于表达语言和理解能力。我们假设,由于 GLS 也评估接受性语言,因此它在识别语言迟缓儿童方面更为准确。根据儿童 2 岁时的语言筛查得分,我们纳入了 97 名 3 岁儿童。诊断测试被用作参考测试。在识别语言发育迟缓儿童方面,GLS优于VTO-LSI-3-year。辨别力的接收者操作特征分析表明,GLS 的接收者操作特征曲线下的面积更大。此外,GLS 在检测接受性语言问题方面也更胜一筹。鉴于这些结果,GLS 可以作为一种可靠的筛查工具,尤其是针对有接受能力问题的儿童。由于接受性语言问题具有顽固性,因此早期诊断和干预对这些儿童非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Infants & Young Children is an interdisciplinary journal focusing on vulnerable children from birth to five years of age and their families. Of special interest are articles involving innovative interventions, summaries of important research developments and their implications for practice, updates for high priority topic areas, balanced presentations of controversial issues, and articles that address issues involving policy, professional training, new conceptual models, and related matters. Although data are often presented primarily to illustrate points, some types of data-based articles may be appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated With Service Referrals and Uptake in Early Head Start: The Importance of Care Setting. Correlations Between State-Level Monitoring and Screening Rates and Early Identified ASD/DD Across Racial and Ethnic Groups Investigating the Impact of a Motor Program on Preschoolers With Disabilities Preparing Preschool Educators to Monitor Child Progress Early Identification of Developmental Language Delay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1