Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of the Critical-care Pain Observation Tool

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Sciences Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.013
Luthfi Fauzy Asriyanto , Nur Chayati
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of the Critical-care Pain Observation Tool","authors":"Luthfi Fauzy Asriyanto ,&nbsp;Nur Chayati","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The Critical-care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) is one of the most accurate methods for assessing pain in ICU patients with critical illness and/or a decreased level of consciousness (LOC). This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the CPOT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The English version of CPOT was translated into the Indonesian version following five steps: initial translation, synthesis of instrument translation results, back translation, validation of the instrument by an expert committee, and testing of the Indonesian instrument. Between September and December 2022, a total of 52 ICU patients from four hospitals in Indonesia were evaluated for pain at rest, during body-turning procedure, and 15 minutes after the procedure using the CPOT. The researcher used the verbal Faces Pain Thermometer (FPT) instrument as a gold standard to assess the CPOT’s criteria validity. Validity assessments included content and criterion validity. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s α coefficient and interrater reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Higher CPOT scores were found during the body-turning procedure than at rest and after the procedure. The instrument’s item-content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.75 to 1.00, and the overall instrument’s average scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.93. The statistical analysis revealed a positive correlation (<em>r</em>) between the CPOT and the patient’s FPT scores (0.877–0.983, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). The significant agreement amongst raters (<em>κ</em>) revealed the inter-rater reliability of the CPOT (0.739–0.834, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Indonesian version of the CPOT has been proven valid and reliable in assessing pain in patients with critical illness and/or decreased LOC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001552/pdfft?md5=718e975e779fa64155a40a257fd8fcb2&pid=1-s2.0-S2352013223001552-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001552","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The Critical-care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) is one of the most accurate methods for assessing pain in ICU patients with critical illness and/or a decreased level of consciousness (LOC). This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the CPOT.

Methods

The English version of CPOT was translated into the Indonesian version following five steps: initial translation, synthesis of instrument translation results, back translation, validation of the instrument by an expert committee, and testing of the Indonesian instrument. Between September and December 2022, a total of 52 ICU patients from four hospitals in Indonesia were evaluated for pain at rest, during body-turning procedure, and 15 minutes after the procedure using the CPOT. The researcher used the verbal Faces Pain Thermometer (FPT) instrument as a gold standard to assess the CPOT’s criteria validity. Validity assessments included content and criterion validity. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s α coefficient and interrater reliability.

Results

Higher CPOT scores were found during the body-turning procedure than at rest and after the procedure. The instrument’s item-content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.75 to 1.00, and the overall instrument’s average scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.93. The statistical analysis revealed a positive correlation (r) between the CPOT and the patient’s FPT scores (0.877–0.983, P < 0.01). The significant agreement amongst raters (κ) revealed the inter-rater reliability of the CPOT (0.739–0.834, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The Indonesian version of the CPOT has been proven valid and reliable in assessing pain in patients with critical illness and/or decreased LOC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将危重病人疼痛观察工具(CPOT)改编为印度尼西亚语版本并进行跨文化验证
目的危重症疼痛观察工具(CPOT)是评估重症监护病房危重症和/或意识水平下降(LOC)患者疼痛的最准确方法之一。本研究旨在确定印尼语版 CPOT 的有效性和可靠性。方法将英文版 CPOT 翻译成印尼语版需要经过五个步骤:初始翻译、工具翻译结果综合、回译、专家委员会对工具的验证以及印尼语工具的测试。2022 年 9 月至 12 月间,研究人员使用 CPOT 对来自印尼四家医院的 52 名重症监护病房患者进行了疼痛评估,包括静息时、翻身过程中和翻身后 15 分钟的疼痛。研究人员使用口头面部疼痛温度计(FPT)工具作为金标准来评估 CPOT 的标准有效性。效度评估包括内容效度和标准效度。结果发现在翻身过程中 CPOT 得分高于休息时和翻身后的 CPOT 得分。该工具的项目内容效度指数(I-CVI)在 0.75 至 1.00 之间,整个工具的平均量表内容效度指数(S-CVI/Ave)为 0.93。统计分析显示,CPOT 与患者的 FPT 分数之间存在正相关(r)(0.877-0.983,P < 0.01)。结论印尼版 CPOT 在评估危重病人和/或 LOC 减少患者的疼痛方面被证明是有效和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
408
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, providing an international platform for exchanging knowledge, research findings and nursing practice experience. This journal covers a wide range of nursing topics such as advanced nursing practice, bio-psychosocial issues related to health, cultural perspectives, lifestyle change as a component of health promotion, chronic disease, including end-of-life care, family care giving. IJNSS publishes four issues per year in Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. IJNSS intended readership includes practicing nurses in all spheres and at all levels who are committed to advancing practice and professional development on the basis of new knowledge and evidence; managers and senior members of the nursing; nurse educators and nursing students etc. IJNSS seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Contributions are welcomed from other health professions on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Scanning resources to build an international nursing knowledge network Effectiveness of nurse-led heart failure clinic: A systematic review Reliability and validity of the Italian Version of the Chase Nurse Manager Competencies Scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1