Internal versus External Corporate Social Responsibility: Company Age and Size Moderate CSR Efficacy

Matthew Pittman, Glenna L. Read
{"title":"Internal versus External Corporate Social Responsibility: Company Age and Size Moderate CSR Efficacy","authors":"Matthew Pittman, Glenna L. Read","doi":"10.51300/jsm-2024-117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts by established legacy brands are often seen as inauthentic. What can brands do to genuinely engage in CSR efforts? This study investigates internal CSR as a potential solution. CSR type (internal and external) and extrinsic cues (brand size and age) interact to affect congruence, authenticity, and subsequent purchase intention for companies that communicate these efforts on social media. Through a series of three experiments, we compare the effectiveness of internal and external CSR in influencing consumer perceptions. Results confirm that CSR is not a one-size-fits-all solution for brands. We find that Internal CSR is more effective for legacy (older, larger) brands, while external CSR is more effective for novel (newer, smaller) brands. This paper is among the first to conceptualize internal CSR as a potential strategy for legacy brands that often struggle for authentic ways to get involved with social issues. Results indicate that consumers want to see larger, older brands try to \"fix\" themselves before they attempt to fix the world.","PeriodicalId":502546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Marketing","volume":"45 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51300/jsm-2024-117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts by established legacy brands are often seen as inauthentic. What can brands do to genuinely engage in CSR efforts? This study investigates internal CSR as a potential solution. CSR type (internal and external) and extrinsic cues (brand size and age) interact to affect congruence, authenticity, and subsequent purchase intention for companies that communicate these efforts on social media. Through a series of three experiments, we compare the effectiveness of internal and external CSR in influencing consumer perceptions. Results confirm that CSR is not a one-size-fits-all solution for brands. We find that Internal CSR is more effective for legacy (older, larger) brands, while external CSR is more effective for novel (newer, smaller) brands. This paper is among the first to conceptualize internal CSR as a potential strategy for legacy brands that often struggle for authentic ways to get involved with social issues. Results indicate that consumers want to see larger, older brands try to "fix" themselves before they attempt to fix the world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内部与外部企业社会责任:公司年龄和规模对企业社会责任效力的影响
老字号品牌在企业社会责任(CSR)方面的努力往往被认为是不真实的。品牌如何才能真正参与企业社会责任?本研究将内部企业社会责任作为一个潜在的解决方案。企业社会责任类型(内部和外部)和外在线索(品牌规模和年龄)相互作用,影响在社交媒体上传播这些努力的公司的一致性、真实性和后续购买意向。通过三个系列实验,我们比较了内部和外部企业社会责任在影响消费者认知方面的有效性。结果证实,企业社会责任对于品牌来说并不是一个放之四海而皆准的解决方案。我们发现,内部企业社会责任对传统品牌(老品牌、大品牌)更有效,而外部企业社会责任对新品牌(新品牌、小品牌)更有效。本文首次将内部企业社会责任概念化,将其作为传统品牌的一种潜在战略,而传统品牌往往苦于无法以真实的方式参与社会问题。研究结果表明,消费者希望看到大型老品牌在试图拯救世界之前先 "拯救 "自己。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Internal versus External Corporate Social Responsibility: Company Age and Size Moderate CSR Efficacy Effects of Sustainable Marketing on Fast Fashion Shoppers’ Perception and Behavioral Inertia Politics and Better Business
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1