Outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty and impact of an enhanced recovery protocol

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Electronic Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.29333/ejgm/14020
V. Beloborodov, V. Vorobev, A. Kalyagin, Svetlana Sokolova, I. Shaderkin, M. Firsov, D. Laletin
{"title":"Outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty and impact of an enhanced recovery protocol","authors":"V. Beloborodov, V. Vorobev, A. Kalyagin, Svetlana Sokolova, I. Shaderkin, M. Firsov, D. Laletin","doi":"10.29333/ejgm/14020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The study aims to analyze the enhanced recovery protocol’s (ERP) effectiveness in a comparative study of elective surgeries for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Methods: The prospective study included 30 patients with UPJO who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty in 2018-2021. Results: Postoperative complications developed rarely, and their frequency and severity were comparable. Independent predictors of UPJO recurrence were the spine osteochondrosis >II period (HR 13.97; 95% CI 1.26; 154.8; p=0.032), the concretions self-discharge (HR 28.49; 95% CI 1.78; 455.62; p=0.018), surgical operation duration > 110 minutes (HR 44.7; 95% CI 3.95; 505.4; p=0.002) and previous nephrostomy (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02; 1.13; p=0.002). Conclusions: In the surgical treatment of UPJO, it is advisable to use ERPs, as this allows achieving a better treatment quality with comparable results.","PeriodicalId":44930,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of General Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/14020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The study aims to analyze the enhanced recovery protocol’s (ERP) effectiveness in a comparative study of elective surgeries for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Methods: The prospective study included 30 patients with UPJO who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty in 2018-2021. Results: Postoperative complications developed rarely, and their frequency and severity were comparable. Independent predictors of UPJO recurrence were the spine osteochondrosis >II period (HR 13.97; 95% CI 1.26; 154.8; p=0.032), the concretions self-discharge (HR 28.49; 95% CI 1.78; 455.62; p=0.018), surgical operation duration > 110 minutes (HR 44.7; 95% CI 3.95; 505.4; p=0.002) and previous nephrostomy (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02; 1.13; p=0.002). Conclusions: In the surgical treatment of UPJO, it is advisable to use ERPs, as this allows achieving a better treatment quality with comparable results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜肾盂成形术的效果和强化恢复方案的影响
目的:本研究旨在通过对输尿管盆腔交界处梗阻(UPJO)择期手术的比较研究,分析增强恢复方案(ERP)的有效性。方法:前瞻性研究纳入2018-2021年接受腹腔镜肾盂成形术的30例UPJO患者。结果:术后并发症很少发生:术后并发症很少发生,其发生频率和严重程度相当。UPJO复发的独立预测因素为脊柱骨软化>II期(HR 13.97; 95% CI 1.26; 154.8; p=0.032)、凝结物自排(HR 28.49; 95% CI 1.78;455.62;P=0.018)、手术操作时间>110分钟(HR 44.7;95% CI 3.95;505.4;P=0.002)和既往肾造瘘术(HR 1.07;95% CI 1.02;1.13;P=0.002)。结论在UPJO的手术治疗中,最好使用ERP,因为这样可以在取得可比效果的同时获得更好的治疗质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Journal of General Medicine
Electronic Journal of General Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
79
期刊最新文献
Corrected QT interval and QT dispersion in temporal lobe epilepsy in children and adolescent Primary pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma: A case report and review of literature Risk factors for postpartum stress urinary incontinence: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis Long-term humoral and cellular responses elicited by Gam-COVID-Vac vaccine in hemodialysis patients: A prospective cohort study Investigating the value of medication management review for asthma patients: A randomized controlled study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1