Developing a Five-Dimensional Construct of Pre-Service Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Instruction Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.29333/iji.2024.17137a
Adi Levy-Vered
{"title":"Developing a Five-Dimensional Construct of Pre-Service Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment","authors":"Adi Levy-Vered","doi":"10.29333/iji.2024.17137a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on teachers’ and pre-service teachers’ conceptions of assessment (CoA) has so far focused on assessment purposes and uses. However, recent decades have seen significant changes in assessment approaches that require a deeper examination of the nature and aspects of assessment concepts. The current study is a continuation of a previous qualitative study that analyzed the COA of 94 Israeli pre-service teachers before and after an assessment course. In this study, we examined these data extensively to identify and formulate key dimensions of assessment conception. Qualitative analysis of the rich datasets, including metaphors, indicates the diversity and complexity of the assessment concept. Five dimensions of conceptions were identified: (1) complexity of the assessment process, (2) emotional attitude toward assessment, (3) assessment uses and purposes, (4) teacher-student relationship in the assessment context, and (5) criticism of the educational system. The findings expand previous conceptualizations of assessment concepts and may develop a broad model and instruments for measuring CoA. This implication is significant in this era of paradigmatic shifting in the assessment field. Keywords: conceptions of assessment, student assessment, pre-service teachers, dimensions, metaphors","PeriodicalId":46858,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Instruction","volume":"1 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17137a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on teachers’ and pre-service teachers’ conceptions of assessment (CoA) has so far focused on assessment purposes and uses. However, recent decades have seen significant changes in assessment approaches that require a deeper examination of the nature and aspects of assessment concepts. The current study is a continuation of a previous qualitative study that analyzed the COA of 94 Israeli pre-service teachers before and after an assessment course. In this study, we examined these data extensively to identify and formulate key dimensions of assessment conception. Qualitative analysis of the rich datasets, including metaphors, indicates the diversity and complexity of the assessment concept. Five dimensions of conceptions were identified: (1) complexity of the assessment process, (2) emotional attitude toward assessment, (3) assessment uses and purposes, (4) teacher-student relationship in the assessment context, and (5) criticism of the educational system. The findings expand previous conceptualizations of assessment concepts and may develop a broad model and instruments for measuring CoA. This implication is significant in this era of paradigmatic shifting in the assessment field. Keywords: conceptions of assessment, student assessment, pre-service teachers, dimensions, metaphors
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从五个维度构建职前教师的评估观念
迄今为止,有关教师和职前教师的评估观念(CoA)的研究主要集中在评估的目的和 用途上。然而,近几十年来,评估方法发生了重大变化,需要对评估观念的性质和方面进行更深 入的研究。本研究是之前一项定性研究的延续,该研究分析了 94 名以色列职前教师在评估课程前后的评估观念。在本研究中,我们对这些数据进行了广泛的研究,以确定并形成评估观念的关键维度。对包括隐喻在内的丰富数据集的定性分析表明了评估概念的多样性和复杂性。我们确定了五个方面的概念:(1) 评估过程的复杂性,(2) 对评估的情感态度,(3) 评估的用途和目的,(4) 评估背景下的师生关系,以及 (5) 对教育系统的批评。研究结果拓展了以往对评估概念的理解,并可能为测量 CoA 建立一个广泛的模型和工具。这在评估领域范式转变的时代意义重大。关键词:评价概念;学生评价;职前教师;维度;隐喻
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Instruction
International Journal of Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
38.90%
发文量
244
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: nternational Journal of Instruction is an internationally recognized journal in the field of education and is published four times a year (in January, April, July & October). The aim of this journal is to publish high quality studies in the areas of instruction, learning, teaching, curriculum development, learning environments, teacher education, educational technology, educational developments. Studies may relate to any age level - from infants to adults. IJI, being an international journal, our editorial advisory board members are from various countries around the world. The articles sent to the Journal are always reviewed by two members of the Editorial Advisory Board (double blind peer review), and in some cases, if necessary, by another member of the Board. Depending on the evaluation reports of the members of the Editorial Advisory Board, articles are published or not. Article evaluation process takes approximately three months. The authors are responsible for the errors, if any, in their published articles. The articles need to be not published elsewhere previously.
期刊最新文献
Availability of STEAM Approach Requirements among Intermediate-Stage Mathematics Teachers and Their Attitudes towards It In the Crucible of a Professional Learning Community: Becoming a Highly Effective Teacher in Challenging Contexts Comparison of Complex Thinking Skills between Students from Public and Private Institutions in Mexico Preschool Teacher Competence from the Perspective of Early Childhood Education and Care Student Teacher What Competences Are Promoting in University Teacher Training Programs? A Study of Spanish Public Universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1