Homogenizing Monthly Rainfall and Temperature Data Series in Maharashtra & Goa

IF 0.7 4区 地球科学 Q4 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES MAUSAM Pub Date : 2023-12-31 DOI:10.54302/mausam.v75i1.5886
Nilesh Wagh, P. Guhathakurta
{"title":"Homogenizing Monthly Rainfall and Temperature Data Series in Maharashtra & Goa","authors":"Nilesh Wagh, P. Guhathakurta","doi":"10.54302/mausam.v75i1.5886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Annual rainfall and temperature data series of all climate stations in Maharashtra & Goa are statistically tested for data homogeneity. To inspect homogeneity of a station, a two-step approach is followed. First, four homogeneity tests Standard normal homogeneity test, Pettit’s test, Buishand’s range test and Von Neumann ration test at 5% level of significance are used to determine test hypothesis for homogeneity on testing parameters of annual rainfall and temperature. Second, results from all these four tests aggregated together into three different classes as ‘useful’, ‘doubtful’ and ‘suspect’. Here 30 rainfall, 29 maximum and minimum temperature climate stations were tested. The results showed 80% stations as ‘useful’, 7% as ‘suspect’ and 13% as ‘doubtful’ for rainfall, for maximum temperature series these results are 17% as ‘useful’, 7% as ‘suspect’ and 76% as ‘doubtful’, while for minimum temperature series these results are 21% as ‘useful’, 10% as ‘suspect’ and 69% as ‘doubtful’. Further, in this study an attempt is also made to correct the monthly rainfall and temperature data series for homogeneity. Stations categorised as ‘useful’ are used as reference series to remove inhomogeneities from ‘suspect’ and ‘doubtful’ stations. To correct rainfall series ratio’s method is used while for temperature series addition method is used. Correction results showed significant improvement in ‘suspect’ category stations. After correction of inhomogeneous series, the results shows all 100% of rainfall stations and more than 65% of temperature stations are now in ‘useful’ category. The corrected stations may be included in further climate research studies.","PeriodicalId":18363,"journal":{"name":"MAUSAM","volume":"120 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAUSAM","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v75i1.5886","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Annual rainfall and temperature data series of all climate stations in Maharashtra & Goa are statistically tested for data homogeneity. To inspect homogeneity of a station, a two-step approach is followed. First, four homogeneity tests Standard normal homogeneity test, Pettit’s test, Buishand’s range test and Von Neumann ration test at 5% level of significance are used to determine test hypothesis for homogeneity on testing parameters of annual rainfall and temperature. Second, results from all these four tests aggregated together into three different classes as ‘useful’, ‘doubtful’ and ‘suspect’. Here 30 rainfall, 29 maximum and minimum temperature climate stations were tested. The results showed 80% stations as ‘useful’, 7% as ‘suspect’ and 13% as ‘doubtful’ for rainfall, for maximum temperature series these results are 17% as ‘useful’, 7% as ‘suspect’ and 76% as ‘doubtful’, while for minimum temperature series these results are 21% as ‘useful’, 10% as ‘suspect’ and 69% as ‘doubtful’. Further, in this study an attempt is also made to correct the monthly rainfall and temperature data series for homogeneity. Stations categorised as ‘useful’ are used as reference series to remove inhomogeneities from ‘suspect’ and ‘doubtful’ stations. To correct rainfall series ratio’s method is used while for temperature series addition method is used. Correction results showed significant improvement in ‘suspect’ category stations. After correction of inhomogeneous series, the results shows all 100% of rainfall stations and more than 65% of temperature stations are now in ‘useful’ category. The corrected stations may be included in further climate research studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马哈拉施特拉邦和果阿邦月降雨量和温度数据序列的同质化
对马哈拉施特拉邦和果阿邦所有气候站的年降雨量和温度数据序列进行了数据同质性统计检验。要检验一个站点的同质性,需要分两步走。首先,在 5%的显著性水平下,使用四种同质性检验标准正态同质性检验、佩蒂特检验、布伊桑德范围检验和冯-诺依曼定量检验来确定年降雨量和温度测试参数的同质性检验假设。其次,将所有这四项检验的结果汇总为 "有用"、"可疑 "和 "可疑 "三个不同等级。在此,对 30 个降雨量、29 个最高和最低气温气候站进行了测试。结果显示,在降雨量方面,80%的站点为 "有用",7%为 "可疑",13%为 "可疑";在最高气温系列方面,17%为 "有用",7%为 "可疑",76%为 "可疑";在最低气温系列方面,21%为 "有用",10%为 "可疑",69%为 "可疑"。此外,本研究还尝试对月降雨量和温度数据序列进行同质性校正。被归类为 "有用 "的站点被用作参考序列,以消除 "可疑 "和 "可疑 "站点的不均匀性。采用比值法修正降雨序列,采用加法修正温度序列。校正结果显示,"可疑 "类站点的情况有了明显改善。对不均匀序列进行修正后,结果显示所有 100%的雨量站和 65%以上的温度站现在都属于 "有用 "类别。修正后的站点可纳入进一步的气候研究中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MAUSAM
MAUSAM 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1298
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: MAUSAM (Formerly Indian Journal of Meteorology, Hydrology & Geophysics), established in January 1950, is the quarterly research journal brought out by the India Meteorological Department (IMD). MAUSAM is a medium for publication of original scientific research work. MAUSAM is a premier scientific research journal published in this part of the world in the fields of Meteorology, Hydrology & Geophysics. The four issues appear in January, April, July & October.
期刊最新文献
Temporal variations of Rainfall over Konkan & Goa during 1901-2020 Extreme value analysis of precipitation and temperature over Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh in western Himalaya, India Importance of PAR interception and radiation use efficiency on growth and yield of Potatoes under different microclimates in the upper Brahmaputra valley zone of Assam Shifts in wetness pattern and periodicity across Tripura state in north east India STUDY ON STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF MONTHLY RAINFALL IN PUNJAB, INDIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1