Students' analysis literacy and numeracy in linear algebra: A comparison across personality types

Wulandari Wulandari, Aklimawati Aklimawati, Erna Isfayani, Cut Morina Zubainur, E. Elizar, Yeni Listiana
{"title":"Students' analysis literacy and numeracy in linear algebra: A comparison across personality types","authors":"Wulandari Wulandari, Aklimawati Aklimawati, Erna Isfayani, Cut Morina Zubainur, E. Elizar, Yeni Listiana","doi":"10.35316/alifmatika.2023.v5i2.311-327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The imperative drives this research endeavour for educators to comprehend the diverse personality types exhibited by students. It is crucial as each personality type encompasses unique strengths and weaknesses that influence cognitive processes, decision-making, literacy, and numeracy skills. The primary objective of this study is to assess the literacy and numeracy skills of students categorized into sanguine, melancholic, choleric, and phlegmatic personality types within the context of Linear Algebra courses. Employing a descriptive research design with a qualitative approach, the subjects of this investigation comprised 47 students enrolled in the Education Mathematics Major at Malikussaleh University: the research employed personality type tests, literacy and numeracy tests, and interviews as the assessment instruments. The data analysis techniques followed the framework proposed by Miles and Huberman that involved stages such as data collection (including students' personality and literacy numeracy test results), data reduction (highlighting key elements), data presentation (displaying test and interview data), and concluding. The findings revealed that (1) 8 individuals (17.02%) exhibited a choleric personality type, eight individuals (17.02%) demonstrated a melancholic personality type, 16 individuals (34.05%) displayed a phlegmatic personality type, and 15 individuals (31.91%) manifested a sanguine personality type; (2) students' literacy and numeracy skills averaged 78.6%, falling into the high category; (3) The phlegmatic personality type exhibited the lowest literacy and numeracy ability, while the sanguine personality type demonstrated the highest literacy and numeracy ability. Consequently, this underscores the importance of students leveraging their strengths and addressing the weaknesses associated with their respective personality types to refine their literacy and numeracy skills.","PeriodicalId":192872,"journal":{"name":"Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika","volume":" 996","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35316/alifmatika.2023.v5i2.311-327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The imperative drives this research endeavour for educators to comprehend the diverse personality types exhibited by students. It is crucial as each personality type encompasses unique strengths and weaknesses that influence cognitive processes, decision-making, literacy, and numeracy skills. The primary objective of this study is to assess the literacy and numeracy skills of students categorized into sanguine, melancholic, choleric, and phlegmatic personality types within the context of Linear Algebra courses. Employing a descriptive research design with a qualitative approach, the subjects of this investigation comprised 47 students enrolled in the Education Mathematics Major at Malikussaleh University: the research employed personality type tests, literacy and numeracy tests, and interviews as the assessment instruments. The data analysis techniques followed the framework proposed by Miles and Huberman that involved stages such as data collection (including students' personality and literacy numeracy test results), data reduction (highlighting key elements), data presentation (displaying test and interview data), and concluding. The findings revealed that (1) 8 individuals (17.02%) exhibited a choleric personality type, eight individuals (17.02%) demonstrated a melancholic personality type, 16 individuals (34.05%) displayed a phlegmatic personality type, and 15 individuals (31.91%) manifested a sanguine personality type; (2) students' literacy and numeracy skills averaged 78.6%, falling into the high category; (3) The phlegmatic personality type exhibited the lowest literacy and numeracy ability, while the sanguine personality type demonstrated the highest literacy and numeracy ability. Consequently, this underscores the importance of students leveraging their strengths and addressing the weaknesses associated with their respective personality types to refine their literacy and numeracy skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生在线性代数中的分析素养和计算能力:不同人格类型的比较
当务之急是促使教育工作者努力了解学生表现出的不同人格类型。这一点至关重要,因为每种人格类型都有其独特的优点和缺点,这些优点和缺点会影响认知过程、决策、读写和计算能力。本研究的主要目的是在线性代数课程的背景下,评估被分为血型、忧郁型、胆汁质和痰质人格类型的学生的读写和计算能力。本研究采用描述性研究设计和定性研究方法,调查对象包括马里库萨雷大学教育数学专业的 47 名学生:研究采用人格类型测试、读写能力和计算能力测试以及访谈作为评估工具。数据分析技术遵循迈尔斯和休伯曼提出的框架,包括数据收集(包括学生的人格和读写算测试结果)、数据缩减(突出关键要素)、数据展示(展示测试和访谈数据)和总结等阶段。研究结果显示:(1) 8 人(17.02%)表现为胆汁质人格类型,8 人(17.02%)表现为忧郁质人格类型,16 人(34.05%)表现为痰质人格类型,15 人(31.91%)表现为阴郁质人格类型。(2)学生的识字和计算能力平均为 78.6%,属于较高类型;(3)痰型人格的学生识字和计算能力最低,而阴型人格的学生识字和计算能力最高。因此,这强调了学生利用自身的优势和解决与各自人格类型相关的弱点来提高识字和计算能力的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Journey to the cosmos: Navigating stellar evolution with differential equations Mathematical Olympiad issues to identify students' reasoning ability using Polya's model Computational thinking ability becomes a predictor of mathematical critical thinking ability Development of numeracy skills: Analysis of students in junior high schools in Ambon City based on teacher's perspective Students' analysis literacy and numeracy in linear algebra: A comparison across personality types
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1