Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators in the Pre-analytical Phase of Testing in a Clinical Chemistry Laboratory of a Reference Institute

Q4 Health Professions Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-30 DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.8556
Ahsan Ahmad Ghauri, Muhammad Usman Munir, Z. Haroon, Muhammad Younas, Muhammad Anwar, S. Kirmani
{"title":"Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators in the Pre-analytical Phase of Testing in a Clinical Chemistry Laboratory of a Reference Institute","authors":"Ahsan Ahmad Ghauri, Muhammad Usman Munir, Z. Haroon, Muhammad Younas, Muhammad Anwar, S. Kirmani","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.8556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To check the performance in the pre-analytical phase of testing in the clinical chemistry laboratory of a reference institute using five key performance indicators and to compare these indicators between the morning and night shifts to ascertain the most probable source of pre-analytical errors. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study Place and Duration of Study: Department of Chemical Pathology & Endocrinology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Apr to Sep 2021. Methodology: Defined key performance indicators (KPIs) were observed for a period of six months. The frequency and percentage of each KPI were calculated. Defects per Million were calculated for deriving Six Sigma (σ) values. KPIs were alsocompared between the morning and night shifts. Results: A total of 272,731 samples were observed in which 2306(0.84%) were found haemolysed (σ=3.5), 604 samples (0.22%) were not received in the Department due to various pre-analytic reasons (σ=4.0), 260 samples (0.09 %) were found having insufficient sample volume for analysis (σ=4.5), 181(0.06%) samples were found having improper/ wrong labelling or bar code errors (σ=4.5) and 161(0.05%) samples were delivered in wrong tubes (σ=4.5). KPI-1, KPI-2, and KPI-3 were found to be significantly higher during the night shift than the morning shift. Conclusion: Haemolysed samples and lost-not-received samples were the main causes of pre-analytical errors Key performance indicators aided as an instrument to screen and improve process execution in the laboratory.","PeriodicalId":31059,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","volume":" June","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.8556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To check the performance in the pre-analytical phase of testing in the clinical chemistry laboratory of a reference institute using five key performance indicators and to compare these indicators between the morning and night shifts to ascertain the most probable source of pre-analytical errors. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study Place and Duration of Study: Department of Chemical Pathology & Endocrinology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Apr to Sep 2021. Methodology: Defined key performance indicators (KPIs) were observed for a period of six months. The frequency and percentage of each KPI were calculated. Defects per Million were calculated for deriving Six Sigma (σ) values. KPIs were alsocompared between the morning and night shifts. Results: A total of 272,731 samples were observed in which 2306(0.84%) were found haemolysed (σ=3.5), 604 samples (0.22%) were not received in the Department due to various pre-analytic reasons (σ=4.0), 260 samples (0.09 %) were found having insufficient sample volume for analysis (σ=4.5), 181(0.06%) samples were found having improper/ wrong labelling or bar code errors (σ=4.5) and 161(0.05%) samples were delivered in wrong tubes (σ=4.5). KPI-1, KPI-2, and KPI-3 were found to be significantly higher during the night shift than the morning shift. Conclusion: Haemolysed samples and lost-not-received samples were the main causes of pre-analytical errors Key performance indicators aided as an instrument to screen and improve process execution in the laboratory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参考研究所临床化学实验室分析前检验阶段关键绩效指标的评估
目的使用五项关键绩效指标检查某参考研究所临床化学实验室分析前检验阶段的绩效,并比较早班和夜班的这些指标,以确定分析前误差的最可能来源。研究设计:横断面比较研究 研究地点和时间:巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第武装部队病理研究所(AFIP)化学病理学与内分泌学系,2021 年 4 月至 9 月。方法:对定义的关键绩效指标(KPIs)进行为期六个月的观察。计算每个 KPI 的频率和百分比。计算每百万次的缺陷率,得出六西格玛 (σ) 值。还对早班和夜班的 KPI 进行了比较。结果共观察到 272,731 份样本,其中 2306 份样本(0.84%)发现溶血(σ=3.5),604 份样本(0.22%)由于分析前的各种原因(σ=4.0)而未被该部门接收,260 份样本(0.有 260 个样品(0.09%)被发现样品量不足以进行分析(σ=4.5),181 个(0.06%)样品被发现标签不当/错误或条形码错误(σ=4.5),161 个(0.05%)样品被装在错误的试管中(σ=4.5)。发现夜班的 KPI-1、KPI-2 和 KPI-3 明显高于早班。结论溶血样本和丢失未接收样本是造成分析前误差的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Audit on the Quality of Pre-Anaesthesia Assessment based on Predefined Pre-anaesthesia Assessment Form Dyslipidaemia In Acute Non-Cardioembolic Ischemic Stroke Patients At A Tertiary Care Center Differential Impact of Subcutaneous Neurokinin B Administration on Epididymal Proliferation in Adult New Zealand White Rabbits: A Dose-Dependent Study Association of Tumour Budding With Histological Type And Grade, Pathological Stage And Lymph Node Metastasis In Colorectal Carcinoma Pattern Of Maxillofacial Fractures In Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1