Role of Inflammatory Markers in Early Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis; C-Reactive Protein or Procalcitonin or Red Cell Distribution Width; A Hospital-Based Study

Q4 Health Professions Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-30 DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.9349
Prinka Bai, Heena Rais, Rabia Asif, Tayyaba Anwar, Sandhiya Kumari, Masab Azeem
{"title":"Role of Inflammatory Markers in Early Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis; C-Reactive Protein or Procalcitonin or Red Cell Distribution Width; A Hospital-Based Study","authors":"Prinka Bai, Heena Rais, Rabia Asif, Tayyaba Anwar, Sandhiya Kumari, Masab Azeem","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.9349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To find out the utilization of C-reactive protein (CRP), Procalcitonin (PCT) and red cell distribution width (RDW) in diagnosing neonatal sepsis considering blood culture findings as gold standard. Study Design: Cross-sectional validation study. Place and Duration of Study: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of Dr Ziauddin Medical University, Karachi Pakistan, from Feb to Jul 2022. Methodology: A total of 42 neonates of either gender with the clinical diagnosis of neonatal sepsis were enrolled. Demographical and clinical characteristics of all neonates were noted at the time of enrollment. A blood sample of 5 ml was withdrawn for the evaluation of CRP, PCT and RDS. The association of different inflammatory markers with the outcome (neonatal sepsis) was assessed. Results: In 42 neonates, the mean age was 7.24±9.24 days, and 26 (61.9%) neonates were boys. Respiratory distress, reluctance to feed and hypoglycemia were the most frequent clinical presentations observed (19,45.2%), (14,33.3%) and (8,19.0%) neonates, respectively. Mean CRP levels among blood culture positive and negative neonates were 40.02±57.84mg/dl and 7.57±13.34 mg/dl, respectively, while the difference was statistically significant (p=0.0068). RDW (p=0.6488) and procalcitonin (0.9021) levels were not statistically significant differences among positive and negative neonates of blood culture. Conclusion: The CRP was a significant predictor of neonatal sepsis, while RDW and procalcitonin did not have a significant relationship with early prediction of neonatal sepsis.","PeriodicalId":31059,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.9349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To find out the utilization of C-reactive protein (CRP), Procalcitonin (PCT) and red cell distribution width (RDW) in diagnosing neonatal sepsis considering blood culture findings as gold standard. Study Design: Cross-sectional validation study. Place and Duration of Study: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of Dr Ziauddin Medical University, Karachi Pakistan, from Feb to Jul 2022. Methodology: A total of 42 neonates of either gender with the clinical diagnosis of neonatal sepsis were enrolled. Demographical and clinical characteristics of all neonates were noted at the time of enrollment. A blood sample of 5 ml was withdrawn for the evaluation of CRP, PCT and RDS. The association of different inflammatory markers with the outcome (neonatal sepsis) was assessed. Results: In 42 neonates, the mean age was 7.24±9.24 days, and 26 (61.9%) neonates were boys. Respiratory distress, reluctance to feed and hypoglycemia were the most frequent clinical presentations observed (19,45.2%), (14,33.3%) and (8,19.0%) neonates, respectively. Mean CRP levels among blood culture positive and negative neonates were 40.02±57.84mg/dl and 7.57±13.34 mg/dl, respectively, while the difference was statistically significant (p=0.0068). RDW (p=0.6488) and procalcitonin (0.9021) levels were not statistically significant differences among positive and negative neonates of blood culture. Conclusion: The CRP was a significant predictor of neonatal sepsis, while RDW and procalcitonin did not have a significant relationship with early prediction of neonatal sepsis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
炎症标志物在新生儿败血症早期诊断中的作用;C-反应蛋白或降钙素原或红细胞分布宽度;一项基于医院的研究
目的以血培养结果为金标准,了解 C 反应蛋白 (CRP)、降钙素原 (PCT) 和红细胞分布宽度 (RDW) 在诊断新生儿败血症中的应用情况。研究设计:横断面验证研究。研究地点和时间:巴基斯坦卡拉奇齐亚丁医科大学新生儿重症监护室(NICU),2022年2月至7月。研究方法共纳入 42 名临床诊断为新生儿败血症的男女新生儿。登记时记录了所有新生儿的人口统计学和临床特征。抽取 5 毫升血液样本用于评估 CRP、PCT 和 RDS。评估了不同炎症指标与结果(新生儿败血症)之间的关系。结果42 名新生儿的平均年龄为(7.24±9.24)天,其中 26 名(61.9%)为男孩。新生儿最常见的临床表现是呼吸困难、不愿进食和低血糖,分别为(19.45.2%)、(14.33.3%)和(8.19.0%)。血培养阳性和阴性新生儿的平均 CRP 水平分别为 40.02±57.84mg/dl 和 7.57±13.34 mg/dl,差异有统计学意义(P=0.0068)。血培养阳性和阴性新生儿的 RDW(p=0.6488)和降钙素原(0.9021)水平差异无统计学意义。结论CRP 是新生儿败血症的重要预测指标,而 RDW 和降钙素原与新生儿败血症的早期预测无显著关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Audit on the Quality of Pre-Anaesthesia Assessment based on Predefined Pre-anaesthesia Assessment Form Dyslipidaemia In Acute Non-Cardioembolic Ischemic Stroke Patients At A Tertiary Care Center Differential Impact of Subcutaneous Neurokinin B Administration on Epididymal Proliferation in Adult New Zealand White Rabbits: A Dose-Dependent Study Association of Tumour Budding With Histological Type And Grade, Pathological Stage And Lymph Node Metastasis In Colorectal Carcinoma Pattern Of Maxillofacial Fractures In Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1