Just Culture assessment tool and its verification in a small seafood organization

M. Z. Wiśniewska, Ewa Majerowska, Tomasz Grybek
{"title":"Just Culture assessment tool and its verification in a small seafood organization","authors":"M. Z. Wiśniewska, Ewa Majerowska, Tomasz Grybek","doi":"10.13166/jms/176328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of the article is to present a proposal for a just culture (JC) assessment tool and the results of its verification. Methods: In the research process the case study method, supported by analysis of the company's documentation, unstructured interview, statistical analysis, and the method of synthesis and logical reasoning were used. Results: It was confirmed that the JC assessment tool used by the studied organization is reliable. The study succeeded in establishing both the overall and partial levels of JC. Although the level of JC can be considered satisfactory, there are important management aspects that need more care than before. Areas for improvement were proposed. Conclusions: Employees' opinions are not statistically different from each other. Employees equally perceive the need for necessary training, safety as a priority at work, the convenience of reporting errors, and the need to respond to problems. Opinions on JC are not dependent on employee work experience.","PeriodicalId":16359,"journal":{"name":"Journal of modern science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of modern science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/176328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the article is to present a proposal for a just culture (JC) assessment tool and the results of its verification. Methods: In the research process the case study method, supported by analysis of the company's documentation, unstructured interview, statistical analysis, and the method of synthesis and logical reasoning were used. Results: It was confirmed that the JC assessment tool used by the studied organization is reliable. The study succeeded in establishing both the overall and partial levels of JC. Although the level of JC can be considered satisfactory, there are important management aspects that need more care than before. Areas for improvement were proposed. Conclusions: Employees' opinions are not statistically different from each other. Employees equally perceive the need for necessary training, safety as a priority at work, the convenience of reporting errors, and the need to respond to problems. Opinions on JC are not dependent on employee work experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公正文化评估工具及其在小型海产食品组织中的验证
目的:本文旨在介绍公正文化(JC)评估工具的建议及其验证结果。 研究方法:在研究过程中,采用了案例研究法,辅以公司文件分析、非结构化访谈、统计分析以及综合和逻辑推理法。研究结果研究证实,被研究组织使用的 JC 评估工具是可靠的。研究成功地确定了 JC 的总体水平和部分水平。虽然联合协调的水平可以说是令人满意的,但仍有一些重要的管理方面需要比以前更加关注。提出了需要改进的方面。结论:员工的意见在统计上没有差异。员工同样认为有必要进行必要的培训、安全是工作的重中之重、报告错误很方便以及有必要对问题做出回应。对 JC 的看法与员工的工作经验无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evolution of Secret Services in Poland. Legal and Social Dimension Special negotiations team as a temporary participating entity in the Act on companies established as a result of cross-border transformation, merger or division Is this already violence? Defining violence and domestic violence and its impact on awareness of the problem Labour incomes and economic activity in Poland Conceptualising securitisation in the field of cyber security policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1