Frequency and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated at a Tertiary Care Diagnostic Facility

Q4 Health Professions Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-30 DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.10108
Aamir Hussain, Ihsan Ullah Khan, Muhammad Qammar Saeed
{"title":"Frequency and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated at a Tertiary Care Diagnostic Facility","authors":"Aamir Hussain, Ihsan Ullah Khan, Muhammad Qammar Saeed","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.10108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated at a tertiary care setting. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Microbiology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from July to Dec 2018. Methodology: All the specimens submitted, which yielded the growth of Acinetobacter baumannii, were included in the study. Isolates were confirmed biochemically by using api 20NE. Antimicrobial susceptibility was done using standard procedures and as per CLSI's latest guidelines. Results: Nine thousand nine hundred thirty-one specimens were submitted to the Microbiology Department AFIP for culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing during the study period. Amongst these, 1633(16.5%) specimens yielded the growth of different pathogens. Of 1633 culture-positive isolates, 101(6.2%) were identified as Acinetobacter baumannii. Among these,34.6% of the isolates were recovered from respiratory specimens, while 29.7% from pus and pus swab specimens. Minocycline was the most sensitive antibiotic with 59.4% sensitivity, followed by Doxycycline, to which 48.5% of isolates were susceptible. Sensitivity to all other antimicrobials was 24% or less. In vitro, sensitivity to Carbapenems is very low.Conclusion: Acinetobacter baumannii was isolated from 6.2% of specimens submitted for culture and susceptibility testing. Minocycline was the most sensitive antibiotic, followed by Doxycycline. Sensitivity to most of the other antimicrobials was 24% or less. An alarming resistant pattern demands strict infection control practices and judicious use of antibiotics.","PeriodicalId":31059,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","volume":" 40","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.10108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated at a tertiary care setting. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Microbiology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from July to Dec 2018. Methodology: All the specimens submitted, which yielded the growth of Acinetobacter baumannii, were included in the study. Isolates were confirmed biochemically by using api 20NE. Antimicrobial susceptibility was done using standard procedures and as per CLSI's latest guidelines. Results: Nine thousand nine hundred thirty-one specimens were submitted to the Microbiology Department AFIP for culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing during the study period. Amongst these, 1633(16.5%) specimens yielded the growth of different pathogens. Of 1633 culture-positive isolates, 101(6.2%) were identified as Acinetobacter baumannii. Among these,34.6% of the isolates were recovered from respiratory specimens, while 29.7% from pus and pus swab specimens. Minocycline was the most sensitive antibiotic with 59.4% sensitivity, followed by Doxycycline, to which 48.5% of isolates were susceptible. Sensitivity to all other antimicrobials was 24% or less. In vitro, sensitivity to Carbapenems is very low.Conclusion: Acinetobacter baumannii was isolated from 6.2% of specimens submitted for culture and susceptibility testing. Minocycline was the most sensitive antibiotic, followed by Doxycycline. Sensitivity to most of the other antimicrobials was 24% or less. An alarming resistant pattern demands strict infection control practices and judicious use of antibiotics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一家三级医疗诊断机构分离出的鲍曼不动杆菌的频率和抗菌药敏感性概况
目的评估在三级医疗机构中分离到的鲍曼不动杆菌的频率和抗菌药敏感性模式。研究设计:横断面研究。研究地点和时间:巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第武装部队病理研究所微生物学系,2018 年 7 月至 12 月。研究方法:提交的所有标本中均含有鲍曼不动杆菌。使用 api 20NE 对分离菌进行生化确认。根据 CLSI 的最新指南,采用标准程序进行抗菌药物药敏试验。结果在研究期间,共有 9931 份标本提交给 AFIP 微生物部进行培养和抗菌药物药敏试验。其中,1633 份标本(16.5%)含有不同的病原体。在 1633 个培养阳性的分离物中,101 个(6.2%)被鉴定为鲍曼不动杆菌。其中,34.6%的分离菌来自呼吸道标本,29.7%来自脓液和脓拭子标本。米诺环素是最敏感的抗生素,敏感率为59.4%,其次是强力霉素,48.5%的分离株对其敏感。对所有其他抗菌素的敏感性都在 24% 或以下。在体外,对碳青霉烯类的敏感性非常低:结论:在提交培养和药敏试验的标本中,有 6.2% 分离出鲍曼不动杆菌。米诺环素是最敏感的抗生素,其次是强力霉素。对其他大多数抗菌药物的敏感性为 24% 或更低。令人担忧的耐药性模式要求严格的感染控制措施和明智地使用抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Audit on the Quality of Pre-Anaesthesia Assessment based on Predefined Pre-anaesthesia Assessment Form Dyslipidaemia In Acute Non-Cardioembolic Ischemic Stroke Patients At A Tertiary Care Center Differential Impact of Subcutaneous Neurokinin B Administration on Epididymal Proliferation in Adult New Zealand White Rabbits: A Dose-Dependent Study Association of Tumour Budding With Histological Type And Grade, Pathological Stage And Lymph Node Metastasis In Colorectal Carcinoma Pattern Of Maxillofacial Fractures In Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1