Dosimetric verification of radiotherapy treatment planning system at TMSS Cancer Center, Bogura, Bangladesh

Mehrab Hassan Udoy, Rajada Khatun, Mokhlesur Rahman, Motiur Rahman, Fajle Rabby, Shirin Akter
{"title":"Dosimetric verification of radiotherapy treatment planning system at TMSS Cancer Center, Bogura, Bangladesh","authors":"Mehrab Hassan Udoy, Rajada Khatun, Mokhlesur Rahman, Motiur Rahman, Fajle Rabby, Shirin Akter","doi":"10.30574/wjaets.2023.10.2.0289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Authentication of TPS is the component of the QA program for RTPS and planning process. So, verification of dose calculation algorithm is essential to measure the efficiency of the dose calculations. The goal is to assess how far the dosage measured deviates from the dose predicted by the treatment planning system (TPS) algorithm using a CIRS Thorax phantom. It has been done to measure the dosimetric variations of 6MV, 10MV and 15MV photon beams. The phantom was initially scanned using a CT-simulator, and the raw data from the gated scans were then exported to TPS to perform the planning. Using this planning, the phantom was irradiated for four different cases. The computed dose was then compared with the measured dose to ensure TPS validity. The findings demonstrate that the variation between the measured doses in altered holes of the CIRS thorax phantom and the calculated doses by TPS was within the allowed limit except few points of four cases. Max. and Min. deviations for 6MV were 3.87% and 0.05% respectively. On the other hand, Max. and Min. deviations for 10MV were 7.87% and 0.12% respectively and that for 15MV are 4.44% and 0.02% respectively. Satisfactory results were obtained for lung and bone substitute. The results demonstrate the accuracy of the doses determined by the treatment planning system algorithm using a thorax phantom, and they also demonstrate the competency of using the phantom for regular verification. In case of external beam radiation therapy with AAA algorithm, the CIRS Thorax Phantom is suitable for dose computation in heterogeneous medium. However it is more compatible for 6MV than 10MV and 15MV.","PeriodicalId":275182,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2023.10.2.0289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Authentication of TPS is the component of the QA program for RTPS and planning process. So, verification of dose calculation algorithm is essential to measure the efficiency of the dose calculations. The goal is to assess how far the dosage measured deviates from the dose predicted by the treatment planning system (TPS) algorithm using a CIRS Thorax phantom. It has been done to measure the dosimetric variations of 6MV, 10MV and 15MV photon beams. The phantom was initially scanned using a CT-simulator, and the raw data from the gated scans were then exported to TPS to perform the planning. Using this planning, the phantom was irradiated for four different cases. The computed dose was then compared with the measured dose to ensure TPS validity. The findings demonstrate that the variation between the measured doses in altered holes of the CIRS thorax phantom and the calculated doses by TPS was within the allowed limit except few points of four cases. Max. and Min. deviations for 6MV were 3.87% and 0.05% respectively. On the other hand, Max. and Min. deviations for 10MV were 7.87% and 0.12% respectively and that for 15MV are 4.44% and 0.02% respectively. Satisfactory results were obtained for lung and bone substitute. The results demonstrate the accuracy of the doses determined by the treatment planning system algorithm using a thorax phantom, and they also demonstrate the competency of using the phantom for regular verification. In case of external beam radiation therapy with AAA algorithm, the CIRS Thorax Phantom is suitable for dose computation in heterogeneous medium. However it is more compatible for 6MV than 10MV and 15MV.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟加拉国博古拉 TMSS 癌症中心放射治疗计划系统的剂量测定验证
TPS 验证是 RTPS 质量保证计划和规划流程的组成部分。因此,剂量计算算法的验证对于衡量剂量计算的效率至关重要。我们的目标是使用 CIRS 胸腔模型来评估测量的剂量与治疗计划系统(TPS)算法预测的剂量偏差有多大。这项工作的目的是测量 6MV、10MV 和 15MV 光子束的剂量变化。首先使用 CT 模拟器对模型进行扫描,然后将选通扫描的原始数据导出到 TPS,以执行规划。利用该规划,对模型进行了四种不同情况的照射。然后将计算剂量与测量剂量进行比较,以确保 TPS 的有效性。研究结果表明,除了四个病例中的少数几个点外,CIRS 胸部模型改变孔中的测量剂量与 TPS 计算剂量之间的差异都在允许范围内。6MV 的最大和最小偏差分别为 3.87% 和 0.05%。另一方面,10MV 的最大和最小偏差分别为 7.87% 和 0.12%,15MV 的最大和最小偏差分别为 4.44% 和 0.02%。肺替代物和骨替代物的结果令人满意。这些结果表明,使用胸腔模型的治疗计划系统算法所确定的剂量是准确的,同时也证明了使用模型进行定期验证的能力。在使用 AAA 算法进行体外放射治疗时,CIRS 胸部模型适用于异质介质中的剂量计算。不过,与 10MV 和 15MV 相比,它与 6MV 更为兼容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The study of an innovative Eéducationnel practice in Greek students: The flipped learning Optimization of solar energy using recurrent neural network controller with dc-dc boost, Cuk, and single-ended primary inductor converter (SEPIC) Converters Fungal species associated with the surface of selected green leafy vegetables from Bwari market, Abuja - Nigeria: implications on consumer health Comprehensive analysis of gold and silver trading patterns and future projections Policy approaches for bioenergy development in response to climate change: A conceptual analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1