Diagnostic Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Pneumonia in Children using Chest X-RAY as Gold Standard

Q4 Health Professions Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-30 DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.8785
Nosheen Sadiq, Ammara Iftikhar, Myra Tahir, Rashid Mahmood, A. Awan, Muhammad Uzair
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Pneumonia in Children using Chest X-RAY as Gold Standard","authors":"Nosheen Sadiq, Ammara Iftikhar, Myra Tahir, Rashid Mahmood, A. Awan, Muhammad Uzair","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.8785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound (LUS) in the diagnosis of pneumonia in children using chest x-ray as the gold standard. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Radiology, Combined Military Hospital, Sialkot Pakistan, from Feb to Aug 2021 Methodology: All patients underwent clinical examination, chest radiograph (anterior-posterior view), lung ultrasound and blood sample analysis in the first 24 hours after admission. A pre-specified hospital radiologist carried out a lung ultrasound. The examination was performed with the patient sitting upright or supine. The presence of pneumonia on x-ray and USG were recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of pneumonia by taking chest x-ray as the gold standard was calculated in all the study participants. Results: In this study, 262 patients with clinical features of pneumonia were enrolled. The mean age of the study participants was 3.27±2.344 years. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy and frequency of lung ultrasonography (US) vs chest radiography (CR) in diagnosing pneumonia was 95.28%, 87.5%, 99.59%, 36.84%, 95.04% and 96.95% respectively. Conclusion: Lung ultrasound emerged as a sensitive diagnostic tool to diagnose pneumonia in children. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value all favoured the use of this modality to diagnose pneumonia in paediatric patients.","PeriodicalId":31059,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","volume":" 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.8785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound (LUS) in the diagnosis of pneumonia in children using chest x-ray as the gold standard. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Radiology, Combined Military Hospital, Sialkot Pakistan, from Feb to Aug 2021 Methodology: All patients underwent clinical examination, chest radiograph (anterior-posterior view), lung ultrasound and blood sample analysis in the first 24 hours after admission. A pre-specified hospital radiologist carried out a lung ultrasound. The examination was performed with the patient sitting upright or supine. The presence of pneumonia on x-ray and USG were recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of pneumonia by taking chest x-ray as the gold standard was calculated in all the study participants. Results: In this study, 262 patients with clinical features of pneumonia were enrolled. The mean age of the study participants was 3.27±2.344 years. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy and frequency of lung ultrasonography (US) vs chest radiography (CR) in diagnosing pneumonia was 95.28%, 87.5%, 99.59%, 36.84%, 95.04% and 96.95% respectively. Conclusion: Lung ultrasound emerged as a sensitive diagnostic tool to diagnose pneumonia in children. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value all favoured the use of this modality to diagnose pneumonia in paediatric patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以胸部 X 光片为金标准,肺部超声波在诊断儿童肺炎中的诊断准确性
目的以胸部 X 光片为金标准,确定肺部超声(LUS)诊断儿童肺炎的准确性。研究设计:横断面比较研究。研究地点和时间:2021 年 2 月至 8 月,巴基斯坦锡亚尔科特联合军事医院放射科:所有患者在入院后 24 小时内接受临床检查、胸片(前后视图)、肺部超声波检查和血液样本分析。由医院指定的放射科医生进行肺部超声波检查。检查时,患者可直立或仰卧。X 光片和 USG 上是否存在肺炎均被记录在案。以胸部 X 光片为金标准,计算了肺部超声波诊断肺炎的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性。结果本研究共纳入 262 名具有肺炎临床特征的患者。研究对象的平均年龄为(3.27±2.344)岁。肺部超声波检查(US)与胸片检查(CR)诊断肺炎的敏感性(Se)、特异性(Sp)、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、准确性和频率分别为 95.28%、87.5%、99.59%、36.84%、95.04% 和 96.95%。结论肺部超声波是诊断儿童肺炎的灵敏诊断工具。灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值都有利于使用这种方法诊断儿科患者的肺炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Audit on the Quality of Pre-Anaesthesia Assessment based on Predefined Pre-anaesthesia Assessment Form Dyslipidaemia In Acute Non-Cardioembolic Ischemic Stroke Patients At A Tertiary Care Center Differential Impact of Subcutaneous Neurokinin B Administration on Epididymal Proliferation in Adult New Zealand White Rabbits: A Dose-Dependent Study Association of Tumour Budding With Histological Type And Grade, Pathological Stage And Lymph Node Metastasis In Colorectal Carcinoma Pattern Of Maxillofacial Fractures In Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1