Diversification of good governance in European Union countries using the TOPSIS method

Małgorzata Hanna Raczkowska, A. Mikuła, M. Utzig
{"title":"Diversification of good governance in European Union countries using the TOPSIS method","authors":"Małgorzata Hanna Raczkowska, A. Mikuła, M. Utzig","doi":"10.13166/jms/176165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main goal of this study is to identify and evaluate the level of good governance in European Union countries and to determine whether there is a relationship between good governance and economic growth.Empirical materials are based on currently available statistical data from Eurostat. In case of unavailability of unit data in the studied year, they were replaced with data from the nearest period, i.e. 2020. Due to the complexity of the analyzed categories and the possibility of ordering objects from best to worst to achieve the goal, we used the TOPSIS method for multidimensional data analysis.The study found that the variable with the greatest impact on the ranking achieved by a given country in the GG range was the Corruption Perception Index, followed by the proportion of the population who trust EU institutions. In the presented comparison, three countries, Luxembourg, Germany, and Sweden, occupied the top positions in the GG scale, while Greece and Cyprus were at the bottom. Countries with very high GG accounted for 11% of the total number of EU countries. No countries were identified as belonging to the fourth class, which is characterized by a very low level of GG. The majority of countries, over 67%, were represented by those with medium to low levels of GG.The analysis allowed for identifying a significant correlation between Good Governance and Economic Growth in European Union countries. It can be assumed that the higher the level of economic development (measured by many SDGs), the lower the level of corruption in state institutions, and the greater the trust of citizens in public institutions, which translates into a higher level of GG.","PeriodicalId":16359,"journal":{"name":"Journal of modern science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of modern science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/176165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main goal of this study is to identify and evaluate the level of good governance in European Union countries and to determine whether there is a relationship between good governance and economic growth.Empirical materials are based on currently available statistical data from Eurostat. In case of unavailability of unit data in the studied year, they were replaced with data from the nearest period, i.e. 2020. Due to the complexity of the analyzed categories and the possibility of ordering objects from best to worst to achieve the goal, we used the TOPSIS method for multidimensional data analysis.The study found that the variable with the greatest impact on the ranking achieved by a given country in the GG range was the Corruption Perception Index, followed by the proportion of the population who trust EU institutions. In the presented comparison, three countries, Luxembourg, Germany, and Sweden, occupied the top positions in the GG scale, while Greece and Cyprus were at the bottom. Countries with very high GG accounted for 11% of the total number of EU countries. No countries were identified as belonging to the fourth class, which is characterized by a very low level of GG. The majority of countries, over 67%, were represented by those with medium to low levels of GG.The analysis allowed for identifying a significant correlation between Good Governance and Economic Growth in European Union countries. It can be assumed that the higher the level of economic development (measured by many SDGs), the lower the level of corruption in state institutions, and the greater the trust of citizens in public institutions, which translates into a higher level of GG.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 TOPSIS 方法实现欧盟国家善治的多样化
本研究的主要目标是确定和评估欧盟国家的善治水平,并确定善治与经济增长之间是否存在关系。如果无法获得研究年份的单位数据,则用最近时期(即 2020 年)的数据代替。研究发现,对某个国家在 GG 范围内的排名影响最大的变量是腐败感知指数,其次是信任欧盟机构的人口比例。在所做的比较中,卢森堡、德国和瑞典这三个国家在 GG 等级中名列前茅,而希腊和塞浦路斯则垫底。GG 非常高的国家占欧盟国家总数的 11%。没有国家被认定属于第四类国家,第四类国家的特点是 GG 水平非常低。大多数国家(超过 67%)的善治水平为中低水平。通过分析,可以发现欧盟国家的善治与经济增长之间存在显著的相关性。可以认为,经济发展水平越高(以多项可持续发展目标衡量),国家机构的腐败程度就越低,公民对公共机构的信任度就越高,从而转化为更高水平的善治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evolution of Secret Services in Poland. Legal and Social Dimension Special negotiations team as a temporary participating entity in the Act on companies established as a result of cross-border transformation, merger or division Is this already violence? Defining violence and domestic violence and its impact on awareness of the problem Labour incomes and economic activity in Poland Conceptualising securitisation in the field of cyber security policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1