Comparison of Dexmedetomidine with Tramadol for Treatment of Shivering Post Spinal Anaesthesia

Q4 Health Professions Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-30 DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.6345
Chaudhry Raheel Ranjha, Muhammad Saeed, Basit Mehmood, Umer Hayat, Sana Abbas, Arona Terrence
{"title":"Comparison of Dexmedetomidine with Tramadol for Treatment of Shivering Post Spinal Anaesthesia","authors":"Chaudhry Raheel Ranjha, Muhammad Saeed, Basit Mehmood, Umer Hayat, Sana Abbas, Arona Terrence","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.6345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the efficacy of Dexmedetomidine with Tramadol for shivering post-spinal anaesthesia. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jul to Dec 2020. Methodology: A total of 158 patients who underwent gynaecological, orthopaedic and general surgical procedures under spinal anaesthesia using 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine 12-15 mg were included in the study. Out of these 158 patients, 64% (102 patients) developed shivering after spinal anaesthesia. These 102 patients were divided into two equal groups, i.e., Group-D (n=51), who received 0.5 μg/kg Dexmedetomidine and Group-T (n=51), who received 0.5 mg/kg tramadol. The response in the next 15 mins was evaluated objectively as “effective” or “non-effective” by the treating Anesthesiologist. Results: Dexmedetomidine and Tramadol were effective in treating shivering following spinal anaesthesia. Our study showed that Dexmedetomidine was more effective than Tramadol in treating shivering, with an effectiveness of 88.2 % shivering relief in Group-D and an effectiveness of 51 % shivering relief in Group-T. The effectiveness was significant in both groups, with statistical significance in Group-D compared to Group-T (p<0.05). Conclusion: Shivering relief was more responsive in patients who received Dexmedetomidine than Tramadol after spinal anaesthesia.","PeriodicalId":31059,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.6345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of Dexmedetomidine with Tramadol for shivering post-spinal anaesthesia. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jul to Dec 2020. Methodology: A total of 158 patients who underwent gynaecological, orthopaedic and general surgical procedures under spinal anaesthesia using 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine 12-15 mg were included in the study. Out of these 158 patients, 64% (102 patients) developed shivering after spinal anaesthesia. These 102 patients were divided into two equal groups, i.e., Group-D (n=51), who received 0.5 μg/kg Dexmedetomidine and Group-T (n=51), who received 0.5 mg/kg tramadol. The response in the next 15 mins was evaluated objectively as “effective” or “non-effective” by the treating Anesthesiologist. Results: Dexmedetomidine and Tramadol were effective in treating shivering following spinal anaesthesia. Our study showed that Dexmedetomidine was more effective than Tramadol in treating shivering, with an effectiveness of 88.2 % shivering relief in Group-D and an effectiveness of 51 % shivering relief in Group-T. The effectiveness was significant in both groups, with statistical significance in Group-D compared to Group-T (p<0.05). Conclusion: Shivering relief was more responsive in patients who received Dexmedetomidine than Tramadol after spinal anaesthesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右美托咪定与曲马多治疗脊髓麻醉后颤抖的比较
目的比较右美托咪定和曲马多治疗椎管内麻醉后颤抖的疗效。研究设计:准实验研究。研究地点和时间:巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第联合军事医院麻醉科,2020 年 7 月至 12 月。研究方法:本研究共纳入 158 名在脊髓麻醉下使用 0.5%高压布比卡因 12-15 毫克进行妇科、骨科和普通外科手术的患者。在这 158 名患者中,64%(102 名患者)在脊髓麻醉后出现了颤抖。这 102 名患者被分为两个相同的组,即接受 0.5 μg/kg 右美托咪定治疗的 D 组(人数=51)和接受 0.5 mg/kg 曲马多治疗的 T 组(人数=51)。主治麻醉师对接下来 15 分钟内的反应客观地评价为 "有效 "或 "无效"。结果右美托咪定和曲马多能有效治疗脊髓麻醉后的颤抖。我们的研究表明,右美托咪定比曲马多治疗颤抖更有效,D 组的颤抖缓解率为 88.2%,T 组的颤抖缓解率为 51%。两组的疗效均显著,D 组与 T 组相比具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论脊髓麻醉后接受右美托咪定治疗的患者的颤抖缓解率高于曲马多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Audit on the Quality of Pre-Anaesthesia Assessment based on Predefined Pre-anaesthesia Assessment Form Dyslipidaemia In Acute Non-Cardioembolic Ischemic Stroke Patients At A Tertiary Care Center Differential Impact of Subcutaneous Neurokinin B Administration on Epididymal Proliferation in Adult New Zealand White Rabbits: A Dose-Dependent Study Association of Tumour Budding With Histological Type And Grade, Pathological Stage And Lymph Node Metastasis In Colorectal Carcinoma Pattern Of Maxillofacial Fractures In Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1