Weight history of individuals with and without physical disability in the International Weight Control Registry

Julianne G. Clina, R. D. Sayer, A. Gorczyca, S. Das, James E. Friedman, T. Chui, Susan B. Roberts, James O. Hill
{"title":"Weight history of individuals with and without physical disability in the International Weight Control Registry","authors":"Julianne G. Clina, R. D. Sayer, A. Gorczyca, S. Das, James E. Friedman, T. Chui, Susan B. Roberts, James O. Hill","doi":"10.1002/osp4.733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People with physical disabilities (PWD) have an increased risk of obesity and related comorbidities compared with people without physical disabilities (PWoD). Previously identified contributors to weight loss maintenance pose challenges to PWD. However, it is not known if PWD experience less success in weight management.Six hundred and nine participants in the International Weight Control Registry (IWCR) were eligible for this analysis (PWD, n = 174; PWoD, n = 435). Self‐reported weight history metrics were compared using general linear models. Perceived weight history category was compared using Chi‐squared tests. Importance of diet and physical activity strategies for weight management were compared using Wilcoxon rank‐signed tests.PWD reported higher current body mass index (BMI) (36.1 ± 0.7 vs. 31.0 ± 0.5; p < 0.0001) and more weight loss attempts (9.1 ± 0.7 vs. 7.1 ± 0.4; p = 0.01) than PWoD. Current weight loss percentage (PWD 13.0 ± 1.0; PWoD, 13.0 ± 0.6; p = 0.97) and weight loss category (χ2 [3, N = 609] = 2.9057, p = 0.41) did not differ between the groups. There were no differences in any weight strategy between PWD who were successful and those who regained.PWD and PWoD in the IWCR achieved similar levels of weight maintenance success. However, higher BMI and more weight loss attempts suggest that PWD may face challenges with weight management. More research is needed to identify strategies leading to success for PWD.","PeriodicalId":503109,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science &amp; Practice","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science &amp; Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People with physical disabilities (PWD) have an increased risk of obesity and related comorbidities compared with people without physical disabilities (PWoD). Previously identified contributors to weight loss maintenance pose challenges to PWD. However, it is not known if PWD experience less success in weight management.Six hundred and nine participants in the International Weight Control Registry (IWCR) were eligible for this analysis (PWD, n = 174; PWoD, n = 435). Self‐reported weight history metrics were compared using general linear models. Perceived weight history category was compared using Chi‐squared tests. Importance of diet and physical activity strategies for weight management were compared using Wilcoxon rank‐signed tests.PWD reported higher current body mass index (BMI) (36.1 ± 0.7 vs. 31.0 ± 0.5; p < 0.0001) and more weight loss attempts (9.1 ± 0.7 vs. 7.1 ± 0.4; p = 0.01) than PWoD. Current weight loss percentage (PWD 13.0 ± 1.0; PWoD, 13.0 ± 0.6; p = 0.97) and weight loss category (χ2 [3, N = 609] = 2.9057, p = 0.41) did not differ between the groups. There were no differences in any weight strategy between PWD who were successful and those who regained.PWD and PWoD in the IWCR achieved similar levels of weight maintenance success. However, higher BMI and more weight loss attempts suggest that PWD may face challenges with weight management. More research is needed to identify strategies leading to success for PWD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际体重控制登记处有肢体残疾和无肢体残疾者的体重史
与非肢体残疾人(PWoD)相比,肢体残疾人(PWD)患肥胖症及相关并发症的风险更高。之前发现的影响减肥效果的因素给残疾人带来了挑战。国际体重控制注册中心(IWCR)的 69 名参与者符合本次分析的条件(残疾人,n = 174;非肢体残疾人,n = 435)。使用一般线性模型对自我报告的体重史指标进行比较。使用卡方检验比较感知体重史类别。与残疾人相比,残疾人报告的当前体重指数(BMI)(36.1 ± 0.7 vs. 31.0 ± 0.5; p < 0.0001)和减肥尝试次数(9.1 ± 0.7 vs. 7.1 ± 0.4; p = 0.01)更高。目前的减重百分比(PWD 13.0 ± 1.0;PWoD 13.0 ± 0.6;p = 0.97)和减重类别(χ2 [3, N = 609] = 2.9057, p = 0.41)在两组之间没有差异。成功减重的残疾人和体重反弹的残疾人在任何体重策略上都没有差异。然而,较高的体重指数和更多的减肥尝试表明,残疾人在体重管理方面可能面临挑战。需要开展更多研究,以确定帮助残疾人取得成功的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Weight history of individuals with and without physical disability in the International Weight Control Registry Importance of early weight loss and other predictors of lower weight loss in a commercial program: A secondary data analysis Weight change in chronic kidney disease: Association with mortality and kidney function Weight regain after total meal replacement very low‐calorie diet program with and with‐out anti‐obesity medications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1