Seeking and sharing information about the threat of nuclear war

IF 1.4 4区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Librarianship and Information Science Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.1177/09610006231219245
Reijo Savolainen
{"title":"Seeking and sharing information about the threat of nuclear war","authors":"Reijo Savolainen","doi":"10.1177/09610006231219245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study contributes to information behavior research by examining how people seek and share information related to the threat of nuclear war. To achieve this, a sample of 1279 posts submitted to Quora—a social Q&A site—were scrutinized by means of qualitative content analysis. The analysis was based on identification of three question types indicative of attempts to seek information and five answer types expressive of information sharing. The findings indicate that the online participants mainly presented opinion questions, while the role of fact questions remained marginal. While sharing threat-related information, the participants primarily offered opinion answers. To a lesser extent, the repertoire of answers also included explanation, prediction, fact, action directive and encouragement answers. The predominance of opinion answers is understandable because there is no recent experience about the use of nuclear weapons against civil targets. Therefore, much of threat-related information shared in online discussion necessarily originates from people’s personal views of what a nuclear war and its effects could be like. The findings highlight that people mainly seek opinions of other people, rather than factual information about the threat of nuclear war.","PeriodicalId":47004,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","volume":"75 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231219245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study contributes to information behavior research by examining how people seek and share information related to the threat of nuclear war. To achieve this, a sample of 1279 posts submitted to Quora—a social Q&A site—were scrutinized by means of qualitative content analysis. The analysis was based on identification of three question types indicative of attempts to seek information and five answer types expressive of information sharing. The findings indicate that the online participants mainly presented opinion questions, while the role of fact questions remained marginal. While sharing threat-related information, the participants primarily offered opinion answers. To a lesser extent, the repertoire of answers also included explanation, prediction, fact, action directive and encouragement answers. The predominance of opinion answers is understandable because there is no recent experience about the use of nuclear weapons against civil targets. Therefore, much of threat-related information shared in online discussion necessarily originates from people’s personal views of what a nuclear war and its effects could be like. The findings highlight that people mainly seek opinions of other people, rather than factual information about the threat of nuclear war.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻求和共享有关核战争威胁的信息
本研究通过考察人们如何寻求和分享与核战争威胁相关的信息,为信息行为研究做出了贡献。为此,我们采用定性内容分析的方法,对提交到 Quora(社交问答网站)的 1279 篇帖子进行了仔细研究。分析的基础是确定三种表明试图寻求信息的问题类型和五种表达信息共享的答案类型。分析结果表明,在线参与者主要提出观点问题,而事实问题的作用仍然微不足道。在分享与威胁有关的信息时,参与者主要提供观点答案。在较小程度上,参与者的回答还包括解释、预测、事实、行动指令和鼓励性回答。观点答案占主导地位是可以理解的,因为最近还没有针对民用目标使用核武器的经验。因此,在网上讨论中分享的许多与威胁相关的信息必然源自人们对核战争及其影响的个人看法。研究结果突出表明,人们主要寻求他人的意见,而不是有关核战争威胁的事实信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Journal of Librarianship and Information Science is the peer-reviewed international quarterly journal for librarians, information scientists, specialists, managers and educators interested in keeping up to date with the most recent issues and developments in the field. The Journal provides a forumfor the publication of research and practical developments as well as for discussion papers and viewpoints on topical concerns in a profession facing many challenges.
期刊最新文献
Exploring artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots adoption among research scholars using unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) The moderating effect of technology turbulence on the relationships between e-marketing mix and customer satisfaction for electronic information services Impact of research characteristics and methodologies used in LIS articles on citation count Public libraries’ role in supporting Ukrainian refugees: A focus on Hungary and Poland Alternative-academic careers of LIS in China: Trends, challenges, and opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1