ADVANTAGES AND DRAWBACKS OF CHATGPT IN THE CONTEXT OF DRAFTING SCHOLARLY ARTICLES

B. Koçyiğit, Alikhan Zhaksylyk
{"title":"ADVANTAGES AND DRAWBACKS OF CHATGPT IN THE CONTEXT OF DRAFTING SCHOLARLY ARTICLES","authors":"B. Koçyiğit, Alikhan Zhaksylyk","doi":"10.47316/cajmhe.2023.4.3.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Incorporating Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly ChatGPT, in academic endeavors has attracted significant interest due to its ability to optimize procedures and enhance human capacities. ChatGPT serves as an informed partner, assisting researchers in doing literature reviews, generating ideas, and even composing scholarly articles. Nevertheless, this revolutionary technology gives rise to ethical considerations in scientific investigation, namely authorship, information-data privacy, and bias. The article thoroughly examines the advantages and disadvantages of using ChatGPT for academic purposes. The benefits are seen in its effectiveness in retrieving information, surpassing language obstacles, boosting the synthesis of literature, easing the production of ideas, and assisting in the outlining of manuscripts. On the other hand, the complicated nature of using ChatGPT in scholarly activities is emphasized by worries about scientific integrity, the possibility of spreading disinformation, excessive dependence, and security and privacy issues. Finding a middle ground between utilizing the advantages of ChatGPT and maintaining academic integrity is crucial. Analyzing the dynamics will be crucial in navigating the changing junction of AI and research activities.","PeriodicalId":388483,"journal":{"name":"Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics","volume":"27 s77","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2023.4.3.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Incorporating Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly ChatGPT, in academic endeavors has attracted significant interest due to its ability to optimize procedures and enhance human capacities. ChatGPT serves as an informed partner, assisting researchers in doing literature reviews, generating ideas, and even composing scholarly articles. Nevertheless, this revolutionary technology gives rise to ethical considerations in scientific investigation, namely authorship, information-data privacy, and bias. The article thoroughly examines the advantages and disadvantages of using ChatGPT for academic purposes. The benefits are seen in its effectiveness in retrieving information, surpassing language obstacles, boosting the synthesis of literature, easing the production of ideas, and assisting in the outlining of manuscripts. On the other hand, the complicated nature of using ChatGPT in scholarly activities is emphasized by worries about scientific integrity, the possibility of spreading disinformation, excessive dependence, and security and privacy issues. Finding a middle ground between utilizing the advantages of ChatGPT and maintaining academic integrity is crucial. Analyzing the dynamics will be crucial in navigating the changing junction of AI and research activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在起草学术论文时使用聊天工具的优缺点
人工智能(AI),尤其是 ChatGPT,因其优化程序和提高人类能力的能力而备受学术界关注。ChatGPT 可作为知情伙伴,协助研究人员进行文献综述、产生想法,甚至撰写学术文章。然而,这项革命性的技术也引发了科学研究中的伦理问题,即作者身份、信息数据隐私和偏见。本文深入探讨了将 ChatGPT 用于学术目的的利弊。其优点在于它能有效地检索信息、克服语言障碍、促进文献综述、简化构思、协助撰写手稿大纲。另一方面,在学术活动中使用 ChatGPT 的复杂性也因人们对科学诚信、传播虚假信息的可能性、过度依赖以及安全和隐私问题的担忧而凸显出来。在利用 ChatGPT 的优势和维护学术诚信之间找到一个中间点至关重要。在人工智能与研究活动不断变化的交界处,分析其动态变化将至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
JANUS KINASE INHIBITORS FOR RELAPSING POLYCHONDRITIS TREATMENT: A HYPOTHESIS HYPERTROPHIC OSTEOARTHROPATHY IN A PATIENT WITH HETEROZYGOUS MUTATION IN THE SLCO2A1 GENE: A CASE REPORT MANUSCRIPTS WITH FAKE CHATGPT-CREATED REFERENCES: A CASE STUDY PREDATORY PUBLISHING AND WASTE OF RESOURCE MY LIFE AS AN EDITOR AND CONSULTANT OF MEDICAL JOURNALS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1