Assessment of Innovativeness of the EU Candidate Countries Based on the European Innovation Scoreboard

Edyta Dworak
{"title":"Assessment of Innovativeness of the EU Candidate Countries Based on the European Innovation Scoreboard","authors":"Edyta Dworak","doi":"10.18778/2082-4440.41.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovation is seen as a key capability for maintaining a competitive advantage, creating value for customers, and capturing a larger share of the market. In the contemporary world economy, understood as a set of mutual connections and interdependencies, innovations are crucial for economic growth and competitiveness. Internationalization and globalization processes in the world economy also concern the innovativeness of economies, and are visible in international use of technologies developed within national innovation systems, globalization of the creation and implementation of innovations, international (global) cooperation in research and development and innovation activities, international (global) protection of intellectual property. The aim of the article is to assess the level of innovativeness of the economies of selected European Union candidate countries based on the Summary Innovation Index (SII) and its components, as well as to estimate the innovation gap between these countries and the EU average of the Summary Innovation Index in 2023. The analysis was limited to Turkey (TR), Serbia (RS), Albania (AL), Montenegro ME), North Macedonia (MK), Bosnia and Herzegovina (BA) and Ukraine (UA) due to the availability of data describing the Summary Innovation Index, provided for all the EU candidate countries surveyed in the European Innovation Scoreboard. The paper formulates a research thesis assuming that the surveyed EU candidate countries are characterized by a lower level of innovativeness of economies than the EU average of the Summary Innovation Index and its components. Therefore, they show an innovation gap compared to the average for European Union countries in 2023. The results of the analysis only partially confirm this thesis. The article reviewed the literature on the innovation and innovativeness of economies and the innovation gap. The applied methods include descriptive analysis, statistical data analysis and comparative analysis along with statistical data from the European Innovation Scoreboard 2023.","PeriodicalId":281572,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomia Międzynarodowa","volume":"323 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomia Międzynarodowa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2082-4440.41.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Innovation is seen as a key capability for maintaining a competitive advantage, creating value for customers, and capturing a larger share of the market. In the contemporary world economy, understood as a set of mutual connections and interdependencies, innovations are crucial for economic growth and competitiveness. Internationalization and globalization processes in the world economy also concern the innovativeness of economies, and are visible in international use of technologies developed within national innovation systems, globalization of the creation and implementation of innovations, international (global) cooperation in research and development and innovation activities, international (global) protection of intellectual property. The aim of the article is to assess the level of innovativeness of the economies of selected European Union candidate countries based on the Summary Innovation Index (SII) and its components, as well as to estimate the innovation gap between these countries and the EU average of the Summary Innovation Index in 2023. The analysis was limited to Turkey (TR), Serbia (RS), Albania (AL), Montenegro ME), North Macedonia (MK), Bosnia and Herzegovina (BA) and Ukraine (UA) due to the availability of data describing the Summary Innovation Index, provided for all the EU candidate countries surveyed in the European Innovation Scoreboard. The paper formulates a research thesis assuming that the surveyed EU candidate countries are characterized by a lower level of innovativeness of economies than the EU average of the Summary Innovation Index and its components. Therefore, they show an innovation gap compared to the average for European Union countries in 2023. The results of the analysis only partially confirm this thesis. The article reviewed the literature on the innovation and innovativeness of economies and the innovation gap. The applied methods include descriptive analysis, statistical data analysis and comparative analysis along with statistical data from the European Innovation Scoreboard 2023.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据欧洲创新记分牌评估欧盟候选国的创新能力
创新被视为保持竞争优势、为客户创造价值和占领更大市场份额的关键能力。在被理解为一系列相互联系和相互依存关系的当代世界经济中,创新对经济增长和竞争力至关重要。世界经济中的国际化和全球化进程也关系到经济体的创新能力,具体表现在国家创新体系内开发的技术的国际使用、创新创造和实施的全球化、研发和创新活动的国际(全球)合作、知识产权的国际(全球)保护等方面。文章的目的是根据创新指数(SII)及其组成部分,评估部分欧盟候选国经济的创新水平,并估算这些国家与欧盟 2023 年创新指数平均值之间的创新差距。由于《欧洲创新记分牌》中提供了所有欧盟候选国的创新综合指数数据,因此分析范围仅限于土耳其(TR)、塞尔维亚(RS)、阿尔巴尼亚(AL)、黑山(ME)、北马其顿(MK)、波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那(BA)以及乌克兰(UA)。本文提出了一个研究论点,即被调查的欧盟候选国的经济创新水平低于欧盟创新指数及其组成部分的平均水平。因此,与 2023 年欧盟国家的平均水平相比,候选国在创新方面存在差距。分析结果只是部分证实了这一论断。文章回顾了有关经济体创新和创新能力以及创新差距的文献。采用的方法包括描述性分析、统计数据分析和比较分析,以及来自《2023 年欧洲创新记分牌》的统计数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Innovativeness of the EU Candidate Countries Based on the European Innovation Scoreboard Analiza podobieństwa państw Unii Europejskiej w zakresie stabilności systemu finansowego, ścieżek zmian cen i wzrostu gospodarczego przy wykorzystaniu metody Dynamic Time Warping Raportowanie schematów podatkowych a dopuszczalność stosowania indywidualnej interpretacji prawa podatkowego Fiscal Balance Factors of the Local Government: Panel Data Evidence from OECD Countries Analiza korelacji notowań kursu cen złota i kryptowaluty bitcoin nazywanej „cyfrowym złotem”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1