MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACH TO EVALUATION OF POPULATION RELIGIOSITY IN RUSSIA'S ASIAN BORDERLANDS

S. Maximova, O. Noyanzina, D. Omelchenko
{"title":"MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACH TO EVALUATION OF POPULATION RELIGIOSITY IN RUSSIA'S ASIAN BORDERLANDS","authors":"S. Maximova, O. Noyanzina, D. Omelchenko","doi":"10.14258/ssi(2023)4-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is focused on an analysis of sociological methods of evaluation of religiosity in the context of current transformations of religious consciousness and worldview, the blurring of boundaries between the secular and the religious, and the prevalence of hybrid variants of religious identity, which imply religiosity \"beyond confession\" and passive religious practices. The authors defend the vision of religiosity as a multidimensional construct that combines objective and subjective, static and dynamic, internal and external characteristics and manifestations. The authors present the results of sociological studies of the population's religiosity in four border regions of Russia - Altai Krai, Novosibirsk Oblast, Republic of Altai, and Republic of Tyva (n = 400 in each region). The Centrality CRS index (Centrality CRS Sh. Huber) is used as the main tool for analyzing religiosity, which allows for an assessment on five dimensions (levels) - cognitions (information), belief (ideology), personal and public practices and religious experience, taking into account the polyconfessional nature of regional societies. The objectives of the study were to compare the results obtained on the national sample with the results in the conditions of the border region and its separate regions characterized by ethno-confessional uniqueness, to analyze the individual dimensions of religiosity and their interrelation with the general index on the basis of factor analysis. It is shown that the index has good psychometric properties, and its individual dimensions are well described by a single-factor structure. The level of religiosity in all four regions generally corresponds to the all-Russian level, while there are serious differences between the regions, caused not only by the axis - national (ethnic) regions - multi-ethnic regions with a dominant Russian and Orthodox population, but also by individual dimensions.","PeriodicalId":33734,"journal":{"name":"Society and Security Insights","volume":"50 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society and Security Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14258/ssi(2023)4-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is focused on an analysis of sociological methods of evaluation of religiosity in the context of current transformations of religious consciousness and worldview, the blurring of boundaries between the secular and the religious, and the prevalence of hybrid variants of religious identity, which imply religiosity "beyond confession" and passive religious practices. The authors defend the vision of religiosity as a multidimensional construct that combines objective and subjective, static and dynamic, internal and external characteristics and manifestations. The authors present the results of sociological studies of the population's religiosity in four border regions of Russia - Altai Krai, Novosibirsk Oblast, Republic of Altai, and Republic of Tyva (n = 400 in each region). The Centrality CRS index (Centrality CRS Sh. Huber) is used as the main tool for analyzing religiosity, which allows for an assessment on five dimensions (levels) - cognitions (information), belief (ideology), personal and public practices and religious experience, taking into account the polyconfessional nature of regional societies. The objectives of the study were to compare the results obtained on the national sample with the results in the conditions of the border region and its separate regions characterized by ethno-confessional uniqueness, to analyze the individual dimensions of religiosity and their interrelation with the general index on the basis of factor analysis. It is shown that the index has good psychometric properties, and its individual dimensions are well described by a single-factor structure. The level of religiosity in all four regions generally corresponds to the all-Russian level, while there are serious differences between the regions, caused not only by the axis - national (ethnic) regions - multi-ethnic regions with a dominant Russian and Orthodox population, but also by individual dimensions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多维度评估俄罗斯亚洲边疆地区人口宗教信仰的方法
文章重点分析了在当前宗教意识和世界观发生转变、世俗与宗教之间的界限变得模糊、宗教身份的混合变体盛行的背景下,对宗教性进行评估的社会学方法,这意味着 "超越忏悔 "的宗教性和被动的宗教实践。作者认为宗教性是一个多维的概念,结合了客观与主观、静态与动态、内部与外部的特征和表现。作者介绍了对俄罗斯四个边境地区--阿尔泰边疆区、新西伯利亚州、阿尔泰共和国和季瓦共和国--居民宗教信仰的社会学研究结果(每个地区 n = 400)。中心性 CRS 指数(Centrality CRS Sh. Huber)被用作分析宗教信仰的主要工具,可从五个维度(层面)进行评估--认知(信息)、信仰(意识形态)、个人和公共实践以及宗教体验,同时考虑到地区社会的多教派性质。研究的目的是将全国抽样调查的结果与边境地区及其具有民族-教派独特性的独立地区的结果进行比较,并在因子分析的基础上分析宗教性的各个维度及其与总指数之间的相互关系。结果表明,该指数具有良好的心理测量特性,其各个维度都能用单因素结构很好地描述。所有四个地区的宗教信仰水平总体上与全俄罗斯的宗教信仰水平一致,但地区之间存在严重差异,这不仅是由轴心--民族(族裔)地区--俄罗斯和东正教人口占主导地位的多民族地区造成的,也是由个别维度造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
WORK EXPERIENCE OF YOUNG PEOPLE OF THE SIBERIAN FEDERAL DISTRICT ASSESSMENT OF THE LEVEL OF DIGITAL MATURITY OF THE SPHERE OF CULTURE: CLASSIFICATION OF REGIONS OF RUSSIA FACTORS OF PROFESSIONAL BURNOUT OF TEACHERS AS A SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROBLEM IN THE SPHERE OF EDUCATION VALUE BASES OF FORMATION AND STRENGTHENING OF THE ALL-RUSSIAN IDENTITY IN THE PERCEPTIONS OF YOUNG PEOPLE MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACH TO EVALUATION OF POPULATION RELIGIOSITY IN RUSSIA'S ASIAN BORDERLANDS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1