War – Writer – Text: Discursive Features (on the Material of Oksana Zabuzhko’s Essays)

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-28 DOI:10.18523/kmhj270983.2023-10.68-88
Svitlana Kuranova
{"title":"War – Writer – Text: Discursive Features (on the Material of Oksana Zabuzhko’s Essays)","authors":"Svitlana Kuranova","doi":"10.18523/kmhj270983.2023-10.68-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is dedicated to a complex analysis of the “war texts”. Discursive features of the triad “war – author – text” are proposed to be researched through the prism of the holistic linguistic act of communication. Discourse analysis of “war texts” is carried out on the material of works of Oksana Zabuzhko, namely, the collection of essays “And Again I Crawl into the Tank” and “The Longest Journey”. The way the topic of the Russian-Ukrainian war is understood and interpreted in the public intellectual discourse is investigated. Such research gives a possibility to acquire data on how the author presents her/his own activity-in-the[1]world and transfers her/his attitude to the events described. It is reiterated that the topic of the Russian-Ukrainian war can be researched within the boundaries of development of the discourse portrait of language personality, as the author’s texts are the information tracks of public discourse. Models of “war texts” of Oksana Zabuzhko are characterized with the help of three types of meaning: experiential (thematic sphere of communication), interpersonal (meaning of social roles), and textual (characterizes the channel of communication). The sense structure of the corresponding respective texts was scrutinized. That helped to acquire new data about their semiotic models.","PeriodicalId":40752,"journal":{"name":"Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal","volume":"85 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18523/kmhj270983.2023-10.68-88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is dedicated to a complex analysis of the “war texts”. Discursive features of the triad “war – author – text” are proposed to be researched through the prism of the holistic linguistic act of communication. Discourse analysis of “war texts” is carried out on the material of works of Oksana Zabuzhko, namely, the collection of essays “And Again I Crawl into the Tank” and “The Longest Journey”. The way the topic of the Russian-Ukrainian war is understood and interpreted in the public intellectual discourse is investigated. Such research gives a possibility to acquire data on how the author presents her/his own activity-in-the[1]world and transfers her/his attitude to the events described. It is reiterated that the topic of the Russian-Ukrainian war can be researched within the boundaries of development of the discourse portrait of language personality, as the author’s texts are the information tracks of public discourse. Models of “war texts” of Oksana Zabuzhko are characterized with the help of three types of meaning: experiential (thematic sphere of communication), interpersonal (meaning of social roles), and textual (characterizes the channel of communication). The sense structure of the corresponding respective texts was scrutinized. That helped to acquire new data about their semiotic models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战争-作家-文本:论述特征(以奥克萨娜-扎布日科的散文为素材)
本文致力于对 "战争文本 "进行综合分析。建议通过整体语言交流行为的棱镜来研究 "战争-作者-文本 "三元组的话语特征。对 "战争文本 "的话语分析以奥克萨娜-扎布日科的作品为素材,即散文集《我再次爬进坦克》和《最长的旅程》。研究了俄罗斯-乌克兰战争话题在公共知识话语中的理解和解释方式。这种研究提供了一种可能性,可以获得有关作者如何介绍自己在[1]世界中的活动以及对所描述事件的态度的数据。需要重申的是,俄乌战争这一主题可以在语言个性话语肖像发展的范围内进行研究,因为作者的文本是公共话语的信息轨道。奥克萨娜-扎布日科的 "战争文本 "模式借助三种意义类型来描述:经验(交流的主题领域)、人际(社会角色的意义)和文本(交流渠道的特征)。我们仔细研究了相应文本的意义结构。这有助于获得有关其符号学模型的新数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal
Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Representation of Psychological War-Related Traumas in the Literary Works of Contemporary Burundian and Ukrainian Writers: African and European Perspectives The Ukrainian Language in the Temporarily Occupied Territories (2014–October 2022) 1984 After February 24th: A Philosophical Rereading of Orwell’s Novel War – Writer – Text: Discursive Features (on the Material of Oksana Zabuzhko’s Essays) War as a Subject of Modern Humanitarian Discourse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1