Exploring the associations between being single, romantic importance, and positive well-being in young adulthood

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Family Relations Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1111/fare.12981
Nicole K. Watkins, Jonathon J. Beckmeyer, Tyler B. Jamison
{"title":"Exploring the associations between being single, romantic importance, and positive well-being in young adulthood","authors":"Nicole K. Watkins,&nbsp;Jonathon J. Beckmeyer,&nbsp;Tyler B. Jamison","doi":"10.1111/fare.12981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The goal was to explore if perceived romantic relationship importance moderated associations between single status and young adults' positive well-being.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Singlehood is often framed within a deficit framework, with the expectation that being single during young adulthood may be costly for well-being. That approach, however, does not account for young adults' romantic goals, which may shape how being single is connected to well-being.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Participants were 909 American young adults, ages 18–35 (<i>M</i> = 26.6, 51% female, 81% heterosexual, 58% White, non-Hispanic), who completed an online survey in December 2019.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Being single, compared to having a romantic partner, was associated with lower love life satisfaction, general life satisfaction, and flourishing. However, the associations with general life and love life satisfaction were attenuated by relationship dismissal.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Although single young adults reported lower general and love life satisfaction and flourishing, when perceptions of relationship importance were taken into account, relationship dismissal ameliorated the effect of being single on love life satisfaction and general life satisfaction. Placing less importance on romantic relationships may be a promotive factor for single young adults' positive well-being.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>These findings have implications for supporting young adults' positive well-being, particularly by framing singlehood as normative and, in some cases, preferable to romantic involvement.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"73 1","pages":"484-501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fare.12981","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.12981","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The goal was to explore if perceived romantic relationship importance moderated associations between single status and young adults' positive well-being.

Background

Singlehood is often framed within a deficit framework, with the expectation that being single during young adulthood may be costly for well-being. That approach, however, does not account for young adults' romantic goals, which may shape how being single is connected to well-being.

Method

Participants were 909 American young adults, ages 18–35 (M = 26.6, 51% female, 81% heterosexual, 58% White, non-Hispanic), who completed an online survey in December 2019.

Results

Being single, compared to having a romantic partner, was associated with lower love life satisfaction, general life satisfaction, and flourishing. However, the associations with general life and love life satisfaction were attenuated by relationship dismissal.

Conclusion

Although single young adults reported lower general and love life satisfaction and flourishing, when perceptions of relationship importance were taken into account, relationship dismissal ameliorated the effect of being single on love life satisfaction and general life satisfaction. Placing less importance on romantic relationships may be a promotive factor for single young adults' positive well-being.

Implications

These findings have implications for supporting young adults' positive well-being, particularly by framing singlehood as normative and, in some cases, preferable to romantic involvement.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索单身、浪漫重要性与青年期积极幸福感之间的关联
这项研究的目的是探究感知到的恋爱关系重要性是否会调节单身状态与年轻人积极幸福感之间的关联。单身通常是在一个赤字框架内被提出的,其预期是在青年时期单身可能会让幸福感付出代价。参与者为909名18-35岁的美国年轻人(中=26.6,51%为女性,81%为异性恋,58%为白人,非西班牙裔),他们于2019年12月完成了一项在线调查。与有恋爱伴侣相比,单身与较低的爱情生活满意度、一般生活满意度和幸福感相关。虽然单身青年报告的一般生活满意度、爱情生活满意度和兴旺程度较低,但如果考虑到对恋爱关系重要性的看法,则恋爱关系解除会改善单身对爱情生活满意度和一般生活满意度的影响。这些研究结果对支持年轻人的积极幸福感具有重要意义,特别是通过将单身作为一种规范,在某些情况下,比恋爱关系更可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Disclosure dilemma: Revealing biological paternity to family and others after unexpected direct-to-consumer genetic results Exploring the role of help-seeking behavior, family financial socialization, and capability on financial well-being Issue Information The Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire: Validity evidence from Portugal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1