Flow Perspectives: Using the FSS-2 to Compare Climbers With and Without Disabilities

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Experiential Education Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1177/10538259231222453
Emily G. Warner, C. Autry, David P. Loy, Clifton E. Watts, Jaehyun Kim
{"title":"Flow Perspectives: Using the FSS-2 to Compare Climbers With and Without Disabilities","authors":"Emily G. Warner, C. Autry, David P. Loy, Clifton E. Watts, Jaehyun Kim","doi":"10.1177/10538259231222453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Participation in adventure as a recreational therapy intervention is well-recognized for its benefits for people with disabilities. Advances in technology and adaptive equipment have increased accessibility to adventure-based activities for those with physical disabilities. Climbing has long been established to facilitate the psychological state of flow; however, there is little research on the experience of flow in individuals with physical disabilities and adaptive climbing, specifically. Purpose: This study investigated if flow is experienced differently between individuals with and without physical disabilities who participated in climbing programs and to determine if there was a relationship between flow and intentions in future participation in climbing. Methodology: The Flow State Scale-2 was used to assess flow and additional questions measured participation. Findings: The global flow score on the FSS-2 indicated that climbers with and without disabilities both experienced a flow-like state. Climbers without disabilities reported a significantly higher sense of control, one of the nine dimensions of flow. Implications: With a better understanding of how people with physical disabilities experience flow, practitioners can better design interventions to facilitate this experience and should know how flow can best be used to promote an active leisure lifestyle.","PeriodicalId":46775,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experiential Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experiential Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259231222453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Participation in adventure as a recreational therapy intervention is well-recognized for its benefits for people with disabilities. Advances in technology and adaptive equipment have increased accessibility to adventure-based activities for those with physical disabilities. Climbing has long been established to facilitate the psychological state of flow; however, there is little research on the experience of flow in individuals with physical disabilities and adaptive climbing, specifically. Purpose: This study investigated if flow is experienced differently between individuals with and without physical disabilities who participated in climbing programs and to determine if there was a relationship between flow and intentions in future participation in climbing. Methodology: The Flow State Scale-2 was used to assess flow and additional questions measured participation. Findings: The global flow score on the FSS-2 indicated that climbers with and without disabilities both experienced a flow-like state. Climbers without disabilities reported a significantly higher sense of control, one of the nine dimensions of flow. Implications: With a better understanding of how people with physical disabilities experience flow, practitioners can better design interventions to facilitate this experience and should know how flow can best be used to promote an active leisure lifestyle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流量视角:使用 FSS-2 对有残疾和无残疾的登山者进行比较
背景:参加探险活动作为一种娱乐治疗干预措施,对残疾人的益处已得到广泛认可。技术和适应性设备的进步增加了肢体残疾者参与探险活动的机会。长期以来,攀登活动一直被认为能够促进 "流动 "的心理状态;然而,有关肢体残疾人和适应性攀登活动的 "流动 "体验的研究却很少。目的:本研究调查了参加攀岩项目的肢体残障人士和非肢体残障人士对 "流 "的体验是否有所不同,并确定 "流 "与今后参加攀岩活动的意愿之间是否存在关系。研究方法:使用 "流状态量表-2 "来评估流,并通过其他问题来衡量参与度。研究结果流状态量表-2 的总体流得分表明,残疾和非残疾登山者都经历过类似流的状态。非残疾登山者的控制感明显更高,而控制感是流动的九个维度之一。影响:在更好地了解肢体残疾人士如何体验 "流 "之后,从业人员可以更好地设计干预措施来促进这种体验,并且应该知道如何更好地利用 "流 "来促进积极的休闲生活方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experiential Education
Journal of Experiential Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experiential Education (JEE) is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing refereed articles on experiential education in diverse contexts. The JEE provides a forum for the empirical and theoretical study of issues concerning experiential learning, program management and policies, educational, developmental, and health outcomes, teaching and facilitation, and research methodology. The JEE is a publication of the Association for Experiential Education. The Journal welcomes submissions from established and emerging scholars writing about experiential education in the context of outdoor adventure programming, service learning, environmental education, classroom instruction, mental and behavioral health, organizational settings, the creative arts, international travel, community programs, or others.
期刊最新文献
Do You See What I See? Examining College Internships From Both the Intern and Supervisor Perspectives Positive Youth Development at Sea: A Case Study of the Shenandoah Model “Wind Therapy” Motorcycling by U.S. Veterans During COVID-19: An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis Letter from the Editor A Prospective Evaluation of the Effects of Outdoor Adventure Training Programs on Work-Related Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1