Pemikiran Siti Musdah Mulia dan Yusuf Qardhawi tentang Konsep Adil dalam Poligami

Pemikiran Siti, Musdah Mulia, Dan Yusuf, Qardhawi Tentang, Konsep Adil, Dalam Poligami, Khofifah Lutfia Effendi, Z. Ulya, Artike History
{"title":"Pemikiran Siti Musdah Mulia dan Yusuf Qardhawi tentang Konsep Adil dalam Poligami","authors":"Pemikiran Siti, Musdah Mulia, Dan Yusuf, Qardhawi Tentang, Konsep Adil, Dalam Poligami, Khofifah Lutfia Effendi, Z. Ulya, Artike History","doi":"10.46870/jhki.v4i2.736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polygamy is a topic that is still being debated, especially among ulama, including between Siti Musdah Mulia and Yusuf Qardhawi. Both of them have different thoughts regarding the concept of justice in polygamy. This article aims to find out the Islamic legal analysis of the thoughts of these two figures and their comparisons. The type of research used is library research using documentation techniques in extracting data as well as descriptive analysis and comparative studies as analysis techniques. The research results show that Siti Musdah Mulia's thoughts are more in line with contemporary Islamic jurisprudence scholars because they both state that justice in polygamy is not only in the material aspect but also the immaterial. This is different from Yusuf Qardhawi's thoughts, which are more in line with classical jurisprudence scholars because they both state that justice in polygamy is only in the material aspect. The similarity of thought between the two lies in the basic istinbath used, namely surah Al-Nisā' verses 3 and 129 and the hadith narrated by Abu Hurairah. The difference lies in the type of justice that must be fulfilled in polygamy. Siti Musdah Mulia stated that justice is not only material but also immaterial which is impossible for humans to realize so this is the basis for prohibiting polygamy. In contrast to Yusuf Qardhawi who stated that justice is only material because immaterial justice is beyond the limits of human capabilities so it is not mandatory to fulfill it.","PeriodicalId":287700,"journal":{"name":"QISTHOSIA : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum","volume":"59 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QISTHOSIA : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46870/jhki.v4i2.736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polygamy is a topic that is still being debated, especially among ulama, including between Siti Musdah Mulia and Yusuf Qardhawi. Both of them have different thoughts regarding the concept of justice in polygamy. This article aims to find out the Islamic legal analysis of the thoughts of these two figures and their comparisons. The type of research used is library research using documentation techniques in extracting data as well as descriptive analysis and comparative studies as analysis techniques. The research results show that Siti Musdah Mulia's thoughts are more in line with contemporary Islamic jurisprudence scholars because they both state that justice in polygamy is not only in the material aspect but also the immaterial. This is different from Yusuf Qardhawi's thoughts, which are more in line with classical jurisprudence scholars because they both state that justice in polygamy is only in the material aspect. The similarity of thought between the two lies in the basic istinbath used, namely surah Al-Nisā' verses 3 and 129 and the hadith narrated by Abu Hurairah. The difference lies in the type of justice that must be fulfilled in polygamy. Siti Musdah Mulia stated that justice is not only material but also immaterial which is impossible for humans to realize so this is the basis for prohibiting polygamy. In contrast to Yusuf Qardhawi who stated that justice is only material because immaterial justice is beyond the limits of human capabilities so it is not mandatory to fulfill it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Siti Musdah Mulia 和 Yusuf Qardhawi 对一夫多妻制中公平概念的思考
一夫多妻制是一个仍在争论的话题,尤其是在乌拉玛之间,包括在西提-穆斯达-穆丽雅(Siti Musdah Mulia)和优素福-卡尔达维(Yusuf Qardhawi)之间。两人对一夫多妻制中的正义概念都有不同的看法。本文旨在对这两位人物的思想进行伊斯兰法律分析和比较。采用的研究类型是图书馆研究,使用文献技术提取数据,并使用描述性分析和比较研究作为分析技术。研究结果表明,西提-穆斯达-穆莉娅的思想更符合当代伊斯兰法学学者的观点,因为她们都认为一夫多妻制的公正不仅体现在物质方面,还体现在非物质方面。这与优素福-卡尔达维的思想不同,后者更符合古典法理学学者的观点,因为他们都认为一夫多妻制的公正性只体现在物质方面。二者思想的相似之处在于所使用的基本伊斯坦白,即《尼萨经》第 3 节和第 129 节,以及艾布-胡莱勒所传述的圣训。两者的区别在于一夫多妻制必须履行的正义类型。Siti Musdah Mulia 指出,正义不仅是物质的,也是非物质的,人类不可能实现,因此这是禁止一夫多妻制的依据。相比之下,优素福-卡达维(Yusuf Qardhawi)认为正义只是物质的,因为非物质的正义超出了人类能力的范围,所以不一定要实现它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence Berbasis Chatbot: Sarana Baru Panduan Hukum Keluarga Digital Pemikiran Siti Musdah Mulia dan Yusuf Qardhawi tentang Konsep Adil dalam Poligami Transformasi Sosial dan Hubungannya dengan Pembagian Harta Warisan Menurut Perspektif Hukum Islam Kedudukan Wilayah Al-Hisbah Pada Putusan Peradilan Nomor : 1083/Pdt.G/2023/Pa.Btl Tentang Sengketa Rahn dan Ijarah Ikhtiar Cegah Stunting Melalui Kontekstualisasi Fikih Parenting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1