Rituals and Explorations in Students’ Mathematical Discourses: The Case of Polynomial Inequalities

Q3 Social Sciences Participatory Educational Research Pub Date : 2023-12-26 DOI:10.17275/per.24.11.11.1
Tuba Akcakoca, Gönül YAZGAN SAĞ, Z. Argün
{"title":"Rituals and Explorations in Students’ Mathematical Discourses: The Case of Polynomial Inequalities","authors":"Tuba Akcakoca, Gönül YAZGAN SAĞ, Z. Argün","doi":"10.17275/per.24.11.11.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study is a qualitative case study that seeks to determine whether students’ mathematical discourses in solving polynomial inequalities are more ritualistic or explorative. A comprehensive analysis of students’ routines was conducted through the observations of what they said and did (write, draw, and so on) around task situations in a small group. This study’s participants were five 11th-grade students from a public high school. These participants were chosen using the maximum diversity method of sampling. The data for this study were obtained through small-group work. The small-group interactions lasted 80 minutes and were video-recorded with two cameras. The commognitive approach was used to analyze the student routines in this study. The criteria for analyzing routines were the performers’ agentivity /external authority, focus on the goal or the procedure, and flexibility. The findings of this study revealed that the students’ routines were neither purely ritualistic nor sheer explorative. Even those whose routines were ritualistic in all task situations thought about the procedure and asked logical questions about the task. In addition, the findings indicate that teachers can play an important role in encouraging students to engage in more exploratory mathematical discourse. This study contributes to the future research on students’ discourse in the context of inequality.","PeriodicalId":36886,"journal":{"name":"Participatory Educational Research","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Participatory Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.11.11.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study is a qualitative case study that seeks to determine whether students’ mathematical discourses in solving polynomial inequalities are more ritualistic or explorative. A comprehensive analysis of students’ routines was conducted through the observations of what they said and did (write, draw, and so on) around task situations in a small group. This study’s participants were five 11th-grade students from a public high school. These participants were chosen using the maximum diversity method of sampling. The data for this study were obtained through small-group work. The small-group interactions lasted 80 minutes and were video-recorded with two cameras. The commognitive approach was used to analyze the student routines in this study. The criteria for analyzing routines were the performers’ agentivity /external authority, focus on the goal or the procedure, and flexibility. The findings of this study revealed that the students’ routines were neither purely ritualistic nor sheer explorative. Even those whose routines were ritualistic in all task situations thought about the procedure and asked logical questions about the task. In addition, the findings indicate that teachers can play an important role in encouraging students to engage in more exploratory mathematical discourse. This study contributes to the future research on students’ discourse in the context of inequality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生数学讨论中的仪式与探索:多项式不等式案例
本研究是一项定性案例研究,旨在确定学生在求解多项式不等式时的数学话语是仪式性更强还是探索性更强。通过观察学生在小组任务情境中的言行(写、画等),对学生的常规进行了全面分析。本研究的参与者是来自一所公立高中的五名 11 年级学生。这些参与者是采用最大多样性抽样法选出的。本研究的数据是通过小组合作获得的。小组互动持续了 80 分钟,并用两台摄像机进行了录像。本研究采用认知法对学生的常规活动进行分析。分析常规的标准是执行者的代理性/外部权威、对目标或程序的关注以及灵活性。研究结果表明,学生的常规既不是纯粹的仪式性,也不是纯粹的探索性。即使是那些在所有任务情境中例行程序都是仪式性的学生,他们也会对程序进行思考,并就任务提出合乎逻辑的问题。此外,研究结果表明,教师在鼓励学生进行更具探索性的数学讨论方面可以发挥重要作用。本研究为今后研究学生在不平等背景下的话语做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Participatory Educational Research
Participatory Educational Research Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
147
期刊最新文献
Determination of Teacher Qualifications from the Perspective of Stakeholders: Rubric Development Study Augmented Reality in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Review Fostering Safe Schools: Empowering Educators and Parents in the Fight Against Violence in Early Childhood Education Setting The Effect of Mathematics Teaching with Mobile Augmented Reality Technology on Secondary School Students’ Attitudes and Academic Achievements The Effect of Computer-Supported Stem Applications on Secondary Students' Achievement and Computational Thinking Skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1