RISK EVALUATION OF LIVESTOCK COMMODITIES – VALUE-AT-RISK APPROACH

D. Živkov, Nikola Jančev, Đorđe Alavuk, Dragana Bolesnikov
{"title":"RISK EVALUATION OF LIVESTOCK COMMODITIES – VALUE-AT-RISK APPROACH","authors":"D. Živkov, Nikola Jančev, Đorđe Alavuk, Dragana Bolesnikov","doi":"10.59267/ekopolj2304967z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper tries to assess the level of losses that investors in four livestock commodities might have. The analysis comprises live cattle, feeder cattle, lean hogs and milk class III, and for the risk calculation, we use parametric and historical VaR measures. Full sample is divided into pre-crisis and crisis subsamples. According to the results, lean hogs are the riskiest asset in the pre-crisis period, regarding both parametric and historical VaR. In the crisis period, milk is the riskiest asset in terms of parametric VaR in all probability levels. However, in terms of historical VaR, lean hogs have the highest potential of loses between 90-97% VaR, but at 99% VaR, milk takes upper hand. In the crisis period, the level of losses for lean hogs and milk exceeds 4% in one day at 99% probability, which means that these commodities should be hedged if investors want to avoid great losses. The results indicate that parametric VaR significantly deviates from historical VaR in both subsamples, which means that investors in livestock commodities should use historical VaR for downside risk measurement.","PeriodicalId":201477,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomika poljoprivrede","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomika poljoprivrede","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59267/ekopolj2304967z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper tries to assess the level of losses that investors in four livestock commodities might have. The analysis comprises live cattle, feeder cattle, lean hogs and milk class III, and for the risk calculation, we use parametric and historical VaR measures. Full sample is divided into pre-crisis and crisis subsamples. According to the results, lean hogs are the riskiest asset in the pre-crisis period, regarding both parametric and historical VaR. In the crisis period, milk is the riskiest asset in terms of parametric VaR in all probability levels. However, in terms of historical VaR, lean hogs have the highest potential of loses between 90-97% VaR, but at 99% VaR, milk takes upper hand. In the crisis period, the level of losses for lean hogs and milk exceeds 4% in one day at 99% probability, which means that these commodities should be hedged if investors want to avoid great losses. The results indicate that parametric VaR significantly deviates from historical VaR in both subsamples, which means that investors in livestock commodities should use historical VaR for downside risk measurement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牲畜商品的风险评估--风险价值法
本文试图评估四种牲畜商品投资者可能遭受的损失程度。分析对象包括活牛、饲料牛、瘦肉型猪和第三类牛奶,在计算风险时,我们使用了参数风险值和历史风险值。全样本分为危机前和危机后两个子样本。结果显示,就参数风险值和历史风险值而言,在危机前,瘦肉猪是风险最大的资产。在危机期间,就所有概率水平的参数风险值而言,牛奶是风险最大的资产。然而,就历史风险值而言,瘦肉型猪在 90-97% 风险值之间的潜在损失最大,但在 99% 风险值时,牛奶占上风。在危机时期,在 99% 的概率下,瘦肉猪和牛奶的单日损失水平超过 4%,这意味着如果投资者想避免巨大损失,就应该对这些商品进行套期保值。结果表明,在两个子样本中,参数风险价值率都明显偏离历史风险价值率,这意味着牲畜商品投资者应使用历史风险价值率来衡量下行风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PROFIT AND FINANCIAL POSITION IN THE PREDICTION OF BANKRUPTCY IN THE MEAT PROCESSING BRANCH MODIFICATION OF THE COBWEB MODEL INTO GENERALIZED LOGISTIC EQUATION FOR THE WHEAT PRICE ANALYSIS AN OVERVIEW ASSESSING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AGRICULTURAL SECTORIAL DYNAMICS: A DRAFT ANALYSIS FORM THE ROMANIAN PERSPECTIVE DOES TRANSPARENCY PAY OFF FOR GREEN BOND ISSUERS? EVIDENCE FROM EU STATE AGENCIES’ GREEN BONDS ANALYSIS OF INFECTIOUS MEDICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT IMPLICATION ON SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC - CASE STUDY OF ŠUMADIJA DISTRICT (REPUBLIC OF SERBIA)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1