Assessing the circular re-design of prefabricated building envelope elements for carbon neutral renovation

Ivar Bergmans, Silu Bhochhibhoya, John Van Oorschot
{"title":"Assessing the circular re-design of prefabricated building envelope elements for carbon neutral renovation","authors":"Ivar Bergmans, Silu Bhochhibhoya, John Van Oorschot","doi":"10.47982/jfde.2023.2.a4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Buildings and the construction industry at large are significant contributors to the catastrophic climate breakdown. The built environment is responsible for 37% of the total global carbon emission, of which about a third arises from the energy used to produce building and construction materials, usually referred to as embodied carbon. One of the key strategies to reduce the environmental impact of buildings is to significantly improve their energy efficiency, which is referred to as deep renovation. Prefabricated building envelope elements intended to prevent heat loss through the building envelope are considered a key deep-renovation technology. Connecting prefabricated elements to a building reflects a potential stream of waste if applied linearly with severe negative environmental impact in terms of natural resource depletion and exposure to pollutants. This article reports on a quantitative Design for Disassembly (Dfd) indicator to assess future recovery potential and, subsequently, its impact on embodied carbon emission of the circular redesign of three different prefabricated building envelope elements. Although none of the redesigned elements are yet considered 100% circular, the development of these three prefabricated building envelope elements showcases that the environmental impact can be substantially reduced following a well-structured and dedicated innovation process. The reduction of the environmental impact is indicated by lower quantities of embodied carbon up to 50% and an improved design for disassembly, reflecting a higher reuse potential of building materials and components. Several limitations and directions for further research were identified to advance the development of circular, prefabricated deep-renovation building envelope elements.","PeriodicalId":37451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Facade Design and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Facade Design and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47982/jfde.2023.2.a4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Buildings and the construction industry at large are significant contributors to the catastrophic climate breakdown. The built environment is responsible for 37% of the total global carbon emission, of which about a third arises from the energy used to produce building and construction materials, usually referred to as embodied carbon. One of the key strategies to reduce the environmental impact of buildings is to significantly improve their energy efficiency, which is referred to as deep renovation. Prefabricated building envelope elements intended to prevent heat loss through the building envelope are considered a key deep-renovation technology. Connecting prefabricated elements to a building reflects a potential stream of waste if applied linearly with severe negative environmental impact in terms of natural resource depletion and exposure to pollutants. This article reports on a quantitative Design for Disassembly (Dfd) indicator to assess future recovery potential and, subsequently, its impact on embodied carbon emission of the circular redesign of three different prefabricated building envelope elements. Although none of the redesigned elements are yet considered 100% circular, the development of these three prefabricated building envelope elements showcases that the environmental impact can be substantially reduced following a well-structured and dedicated innovation process. The reduction of the environmental impact is indicated by lower quantities of embodied carbon up to 50% and an improved design for disassembly, reflecting a higher reuse potential of building materials and components. Several limitations and directions for further research were identified to advance the development of circular, prefabricated deep-renovation building envelope elements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估预制建筑围护结构的循环再设计,实现碳中和改造
建筑物和整个建筑业是造成灾难性气候破坏的重要因素。建筑环境占全球碳排放总量的 37%,其中约三分之一来自生产建筑和建筑材料所使用的能源,通常称为内含碳。减少建筑物对环境影响的关键策略之一是大幅提高建筑物的能效,即深度翻新。旨在防止热量通过建筑围护结构流失的预制建筑围护结构构件被认为是一种关键的深度翻新技术。将预制构件连接到建筑物上,如果是线性应用,则会产生潜在的废物流,并在自然资源耗竭和污染物暴露方面对环境造成严重的负面影响。本文报告了一个量化的拆卸设计(Dfd)指标,用于评估三种不同预制建筑围护结构元素的循环再设计的未来回收潜力及其对体现碳排放的影响。尽管重新设计的构件还不能被认为是 100% 的循环型构件,但这三种预制建筑外围护结构构件的开发表明,经过结构合理、专注的创新过程,对环境的影响可以大大降低。减少对环境的影响表现在:降低了 50% 的内含碳量,改进了拆卸设计,提高了建筑材料和部件的再利用潜力。为推动循环型预制深层翻新建筑围护结构的发展,确定了一些局限性和进一步研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Facade Design and Engineering
Journal of Facade Design and Engineering Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Facade Design and Engineering presents new research results and new proven practice in the field of facade design and engineering. The goal is to improve building technologies, as well as process management and architectural design. This journal is a valuable resource for professionals and academics involved in the design and engineering of building envelopes, including the following disciplines: Architecture Façade Engineering Climate Design Building Services Integration Building Physics Façade Design and Construction Management Novel Material Applications. The journal will be directed at the scientific community, but it will also feature papers that focus on the dissemination of science into practice and industrial innovations. In this way, readers explore the interaction between scientific developments, technical considerations and management issues.
期刊最新文献
Data-driven and LCA-based Framework for environmental and circular assessment of Modular Curtain Walls Energy retrofit with prefabricated timber-based façade modules: pre- and post-comparison between two identical buildings Definition and design of a prefabricated and modular façade system to incorporate solar harvesting technologies Energy-saving potential of thermochromic coatings in transparent building envelope components Off-site prefabricated hybrid façade systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1