Comparisons of Twelve Freshwater Mussel Bed Assemblages Quantitatively Sampled at a 15-year Interval in the Buffalo National River, Arkansas, USA

IF 1.7 Q3 ECOLOGY Ecologies Pub Date : 2023-12-23 DOI:10.3390/ecologies5010001
Anna M. Pieri, J. L. Harris, Mickey W. Matthews, Shawn W. Hodges, Ashley R. Rodman, Jennifer L. Bouldin, A. Christian
{"title":"Comparisons of Twelve Freshwater Mussel Bed Assemblages Quantitatively Sampled at a 15-year Interval in the Buffalo National River, Arkansas, USA","authors":"Anna M. Pieri, J. L. Harris, Mickey W. Matthews, Shawn W. Hodges, Ashley R. Rodman, Jennifer L. Bouldin, A. Christian","doi":"10.3390/ecologies5010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historically, 23 freshwater mussel species have been documented from the Buffalo National River (BNR), a 246 km, free-flowing river in northern Arkansas. The potential threats to BNR include land use/land cover changes, eutrophication, recreation, physical habitat changes, and various climate change-related effects. Twelve quantitative mussel bed sites were established and then sampled using a stratified random sampling protocol to evaluate the long-term changes between 2006 and 2020–2021 in population and assemblage characteristics. We compared (1) overall mussel bed persistence, sampling confidence levels and study-wide relative abundances, and compared species’ size and size-frequency distributions; (2) 10 overall site assemblage variables using paired t-tests; (3) site-level mean density, richness, and diversity indices using pair-wise Mann–Whitney U statistics; and (4) assemblage composition using Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling. The major findings included the following: (1) sampling efforts based on a targeted 80% confidence level appears relatively robust, (2) BNR mussel assemblage composition and structure were relatively stable (however, small mussel bed persistence is a concern), (3) 7 of 23 sites were outliers based on freshwater mussel composition and habitat characteristics, and (4) assemblage composition changed with three species declining (Actinonaias ligamentina, Lasmigona costata, and Ptychobranchus occidentalis) and four species increasing (Cambarunio hesperus, Cyclonaias tuberculata, Eurynia dilatata, and Venustaconcha pleasii) between monitoring events.","PeriodicalId":72866,"journal":{"name":"Ecologies","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies5010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historically, 23 freshwater mussel species have been documented from the Buffalo National River (BNR), a 246 km, free-flowing river in northern Arkansas. The potential threats to BNR include land use/land cover changes, eutrophication, recreation, physical habitat changes, and various climate change-related effects. Twelve quantitative mussel bed sites were established and then sampled using a stratified random sampling protocol to evaluate the long-term changes between 2006 and 2020–2021 in population and assemblage characteristics. We compared (1) overall mussel bed persistence, sampling confidence levels and study-wide relative abundances, and compared species’ size and size-frequency distributions; (2) 10 overall site assemblage variables using paired t-tests; (3) site-level mean density, richness, and diversity indices using pair-wise Mann–Whitney U statistics; and (4) assemblage composition using Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling. The major findings included the following: (1) sampling efforts based on a targeted 80% confidence level appears relatively robust, (2) BNR mussel assemblage composition and structure were relatively stable (however, small mussel bed persistence is a concern), (3) 7 of 23 sites were outliers based on freshwater mussel composition and habitat characteristics, and (4) assemblage composition changed with three species declining (Actinonaias ligamentina, Lasmigona costata, and Ptychobranchus occidentalis) and four species increasing (Cambarunio hesperus, Cyclonaias tuberculata, Eurynia dilatata, and Venustaconcha pleasii) between monitoring events.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国阿肯色州布法罗国家河 15 年间定量采样的 12 个淡水贻贝床组合比较
水牛城国家河(BNR)位于阿肯色州北部,是一条长达 246 公里的自由流淌的河流,历史上曾记录过 23 种淡水贻贝。水牛城国家河面临的潜在威胁包括土地利用/土地覆盖变化、富营养化、娱乐、物理栖息地变化以及与气候变化相关的各种影响。我们建立了 12 个定量贻贝床点,然后采用分层随机取样协议进行取样,以评估 2006 年至 2020-2021 年期间种群和组合特征的长期变化。我们比较了:(1)整体贻贝床的持久性、采样置信度和整个研究范围内的相对丰度,并比较了物种的大小和大小-频率分布;(2)使用配对 t 检验法比较了 10 个整体地点的集合变量;(3)使用配对 Mann-Whitney U 统计法比较了地点级平均密度、丰富度和多样性指数;以及(4)使用非计量多维标度法比较了集合组成。主要发现如下(1) 基于目标 80% 置信度的取样工作显得相对稳健;(2) BNR 蚌类的组成和结构相对稳定(但小蚌床的持续性令人担忧);(3) 根据淡水蚌类组成和生境特征,23 个地点中有 7 个是异常值;以及 (4) 蚌类的组成和结构相对稳定(但小蚌床的持续性令人担忧)、(4) 在两次监测活动之间,贻贝群的组成发生了变化,3 个物种减少(Actinonaias ligamentina、Lasmigona costata 和 Ptychobranchus occidentalis),4 个物种增加(Cambarunio hesperus、Cyclonaias tuberculata、Eurynia dilatata 和 Venustaconcha pleasii)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparisons of Twelve Freshwater Mussel Bed Assemblages Quantitatively Sampled at a 15-year Interval in the Buffalo National River, Arkansas, USA Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change on the At-Risk Species Anaxyrus microscaphus (The Arizona Toad): A Local and Range-Wide Habitat Suitability Analysis Effects of Environmental Factors on Plant Productivity in the Mountain Grassland of the Mountain Zebra National Park, Eastern Cape, South Africa Soil Conditioning and Neighbor Identity Influence on Cycas Seedling Performance Artificial Light at Night (ALAN) Influences Understory Plant Traits through Ecological Processes: A Two-Year Experiment in a Rubber Plantation in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1