The Term “Nafs” in The Qur’ān

Kader Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI:10.18317/kaderdergi.1390086
Tuğba Günal
{"title":"The Term “Nafs” in The Qur’ān","authors":"Tuğba Günal","doi":"10.18317/kaderdergi.1390086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The definition, nature, characteristics, and identification of the nafs are among the most fundamental problems in both metaphysics and theology. The manner in which the subject of the nafs is addressed even provides the opportunity to scrutinize the entire Islamic thought tradition through this topic. Indeed, it can be observed that the approach to the topic of the nafs is foundational to cosmological, ontological, epistemological, and ethical aspects in understanding existence in general and human existence in particular, which indicates that nafs has many dimensions rather than one definitive character. According to the prevailing understanding in the literature, nafs is emphasized to a) play a significant role in the formation of existence, b) have a nature separate from the body, c) be the rationale for obtaining knowledge, and d) be a source for ethical actions. In this context, the inquiries “where am I and what am I related to”, “what am I”, “what and how can I know” and “what should I do” are directly addressed within the framework of the theory of the nafs. The presentation of the fundamental determinant of human existence as a separate and distinct entity from the body is based on certain reasons. Humans’ abilities to operate cognitive processes at a higher level, to generate ethical actions, and to be addressed by revelation has led to the conclusion that humans are different from and superior to other beings. This distinctiveness and superiority, however, imply that existence is not limited to the material. The idea that matter is always associated with qualities such as change, decay, fragmentation, and extinction has nourished this belief. Therefore, especially in the later period of kalām (mutaʾaḫḫirūn), the conception of existence which is material but is not restricted to materiality alone is rejected. In other words, the idea of a being that, while material, can produce non-material outputs has been abandoned, and human beings have been examined behind the duality of nafs and body. The preference for a dualistic understanding is not inherent in the formation of kalām. It is observed that in the early periods of kalām (mutaqaddimūn), Mu‘tazilī, Ash‘arī, and Māturīdī literature, collectively, emphasized the need to define human existence without reference to a separate nafs from the body. This preference for a dualistic understanding in analyzing human existence is a product of the influence resulting from encounters with different cultures. In this regard, the impact of Greek, Indian, Egyptian, and Sumerian philosophies on Islamic thought is evident. The fundamentally non-dualistic approach of kalām seems to be stemmed from the Qur’ān. In our study, the foundation of this claim will be laid down. The word nafs one of the fundamental terms of the Qur’ān, will be examined from a holistic perspective. This examination will also provide a basis for evaluating the literature on this subject.","PeriodicalId":17877,"journal":{"name":"Kader","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18317/kaderdergi.1390086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The definition, nature, characteristics, and identification of the nafs are among the most fundamental problems in both metaphysics and theology. The manner in which the subject of the nafs is addressed even provides the opportunity to scrutinize the entire Islamic thought tradition through this topic. Indeed, it can be observed that the approach to the topic of the nafs is foundational to cosmological, ontological, epistemological, and ethical aspects in understanding existence in general and human existence in particular, which indicates that nafs has many dimensions rather than one definitive character. According to the prevailing understanding in the literature, nafs is emphasized to a) play a significant role in the formation of existence, b) have a nature separate from the body, c) be the rationale for obtaining knowledge, and d) be a source for ethical actions. In this context, the inquiries “where am I and what am I related to”, “what am I”, “what and how can I know” and “what should I do” are directly addressed within the framework of the theory of the nafs. The presentation of the fundamental determinant of human existence as a separate and distinct entity from the body is based on certain reasons. Humans’ abilities to operate cognitive processes at a higher level, to generate ethical actions, and to be addressed by revelation has led to the conclusion that humans are different from and superior to other beings. This distinctiveness and superiority, however, imply that existence is not limited to the material. The idea that matter is always associated with qualities such as change, decay, fragmentation, and extinction has nourished this belief. Therefore, especially in the later period of kalām (mutaʾaḫḫirūn), the conception of existence which is material but is not restricted to materiality alone is rejected. In other words, the idea of a being that, while material, can produce non-material outputs has been abandoned, and human beings have been examined behind the duality of nafs and body. The preference for a dualistic understanding is not inherent in the formation of kalām. It is observed that in the early periods of kalām (mutaqaddimūn), Mu‘tazilī, Ash‘arī, and Māturīdī literature, collectively, emphasized the need to define human existence without reference to a separate nafs from the body. This preference for a dualistic understanding in analyzing human existence is a product of the influence resulting from encounters with different cultures. In this regard, the impact of Greek, Indian, Egyptian, and Sumerian philosophies on Islamic thought is evident. The fundamentally non-dualistic approach of kalām seems to be stemmed from the Qur’ān. In our study, the foundation of this claim will be laid down. The word nafs one of the fundamental terms of the Qur’ān, will be examined from a holistic perspective. This examination will also provide a basis for evaluating the literature on this subject.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古兰经》中的 "Nafs "一词
nafs 的定义、性质、特征和识别是形而上学和神学中最基本的问题之一。对 "灵魂 "这一主题的处理方式甚至提供了通过这一主题审视整个伊斯兰思想传统的机会。事实上,我们可以看到,"奴性 "这一主题是理解一般存在,特别是人类存在的宇宙论、本体论、认识论和伦理方面的基础,这表明 "奴性 "具有多个层面,而不是一个确定的特征。根据文献中的普遍理解,nafs 被强调为:a) 在存在的形成过程中发挥重要作用;b) 具有独立于身体的性质;c) 是获取知识的依据;d) 是道德行为的源泉。在这种情况下,"我在哪里,我与什么有关"、"我是什么"、"我能知道什么和如何知道 "以及 "我应该做什么 "等问题都可以在 "自我 "理论的框架内直接解决。将人类存在的根本决定因素作为一个独立于身体的独特实体是有一定道理的。人类有能力在更高层次上运行认知过程,有能力产生道德行为,有能力接受启示,这导致了人类不同于其他生物并优于其他生物的结论。然而,这种独特性和优越性意味着存在并不局限于物质。物质总是与变化、腐朽、支离破碎和消亡等特质联系在一起,这种观念滋养了这种信念。因此,特别是在卡拉姆(mutaʾaḫḫirūn)后期,人们拒绝接受物质存在但不局限于物质性的概念。换句话说,虽然是物质的存在,但却能产生非物质的产出,这种观点已被摒弃,人类已被置于 "自我"(nafs)和 "身体"(body)的二元性背后进行审视。对二元论理解的偏好并不是卡拉姆形成过程中固有的。据观察,在卡拉姆(mutaqaddimūn)的早期,穆塔兹里(Mu'tazilī)、阿什阿里(Ash'arī)和马图里迪(Māturīdī)的文献共同强调了界定人类存在的必要性,而没有提及将 "灵魂"(nafs)与 "身体"(body)分开。在分析人的存在时倾向于二元论的理解是受到不同文化影响的产物。在这方面,希腊、印度、埃及和苏美尔哲学对伊斯兰思想的影响是显而易见的。卡拉姆的非二元论基本方法似乎源自《古兰经》。我们的研究将为这一说法奠定基础。nafs 是《古兰经》的基本术语之一,我们将从整体的角度对其进行研究。这一研究还将为评估有关这一主题的文献提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
God, Logic and Lies: Intra-Ḥanafī Polemics on Divine Omnipotence in Colonial India The Transformation of Radjʿa Doctrine of Shiʿa: A Case Study on the Nusayrīs, the Druzes and the Bābī-Bahāīs Muhammed Cân Yûsuf el-Karabâğî’nin Zorunlu Varlık Konusunda Bir Risâlesi: Tahkik ve Değerlendirme The Place And Importance of Dalāʾil al-nubuwwa In The Context of The Defense of Prophethood Özbekistan'da Bilimsel Ateizm Gelişiminin Retrospektif Analizi (XX. Yüzyılın 30'larında)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1