Study on item analysis of multiple – choice questions amongst the undergraduate dental students

C. Lama, Rabita Kharbuja, Deepika Karki, S. Dhungel
{"title":"Study on item analysis of multiple – choice questions amongst the undergraduate dental students","authors":"C. Lama, Rabita Kharbuja, Deepika Karki, S. Dhungel","doi":"10.3126/nmcj.v25i4.60876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessments are powerful tools for bringing on the achievement of educational goals and one of the tools for bringing it rightly is “item analysis.” Multiple - Choice Questions (MCQs) are one of the most common methods of assessing the knowledge capabilities of undergraduate and postgraduate medical students. The main objective of this study was to analyze the quality of MCQs and to assess the relationships of items having good difficulty and discrimination indices with their distracter efficiency. After getting an ethical approval from Institutional Review Committee of Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital a cross – sectional study was conducted over a period of one year from January 2022 to December 2022 in the Department of Human Anatomy of Nepal Medical College. The difficulty index (DIF I), discrimination index (DI) and distracter efficiency (DE) were calculated and analyzed. The results obtained revealed that the mean and standard deviation of DIF I, DI and DE were 56.75±22.6, 0.3±0.2 and 43.24±25.66 respectively. The items analyzed were neither too easy and nor too difficult (DIF I = 62.8%). The majority of items fulfilled the criteria of acceptable difficulty and good discrimination index and the maximum number of items were found to have 2 NFDs (DE = 33.33 %). The present study was hence undertaken as it assists to evaluate the MCQ items to discern its effectiveness in assessing the knowledge of students as well as it plays a vital role in developing a question bank having valid MCQs.","PeriodicalId":506882,"journal":{"name":"Nepal Medical College Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepal Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nmcj.v25i4.60876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessments are powerful tools for bringing on the achievement of educational goals and one of the tools for bringing it rightly is “item analysis.” Multiple - Choice Questions (MCQs) are one of the most common methods of assessing the knowledge capabilities of undergraduate and postgraduate medical students. The main objective of this study was to analyze the quality of MCQs and to assess the relationships of items having good difficulty and discrimination indices with their distracter efficiency. After getting an ethical approval from Institutional Review Committee of Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital a cross – sectional study was conducted over a period of one year from January 2022 to December 2022 in the Department of Human Anatomy of Nepal Medical College. The difficulty index (DIF I), discrimination index (DI) and distracter efficiency (DE) were calculated and analyzed. The results obtained revealed that the mean and standard deviation of DIF I, DI and DE were 56.75±22.6, 0.3±0.2 and 43.24±25.66 respectively. The items analyzed were neither too easy and nor too difficult (DIF I = 62.8%). The majority of items fulfilled the criteria of acceptable difficulty and good discrimination index and the maximum number of items were found to have 2 NFDs (DE = 33.33 %). The present study was hence undertaken as it assists to evaluate the MCQ items to discern its effectiveness in assessing the knowledge of students as well as it plays a vital role in developing a question bank having valid MCQs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口腔医学本科生多项选择题的题目分析研究
评估是实现教育目标的有力工具,而 "项目分析 "就是实现这一目标的工具之一。多项选择题(MCQs)是评估医学本科生和研究生知识能力的最常用方法之一。本研究的主要目的是分析 MCQ 的质量,并评估具有良好难度和区分度指数的题目与其分心效率之间的关系。在获得尼泊尔医学院教学医院机构审查委员会的伦理批准后,我们于 2022 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月在尼泊尔医学院人体解剖学系开展了一项为期一年的横断面研究。研究计算并分析了难度指数(DIF I)、辨别指数(DI)和分心效率(DE)。结果显示,DIF I、DI 和 DE 的平均值和标准偏差分别为 56.75±22.6、0.3±0.2 和 43.24±25.66。所分析的项目既不太易,也不太难(DIF I = 62.8%)。大多数项目符合可接受的难度和良好的区分度标准,发现有 2 个 NFD 的项目最多(DE = 33.33 %)。因此,本研究有助于对 MCQ 项目进行评估,以确定其在评估学生知识方面的有效性,并在开发具有有效 MCQ 的题库方面发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discharge Against Medical Advice Among Neonates Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital The Association between S.T.O.N.E. Nephrolithometry Score and Hemoglobin Drop in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Perception of Objective Structured Clinical Examination Among Undergraduates Medical Students Knowledge of Tooth Discoloration and Tooth Bleaching amongst Adult Patients Visiting a Dental Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal Study of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcome of Acute Kidney Injury in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Tertiary Care Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1