A Comparative Study of Solid-State and Co-precipitation Methods for Synthesis of NMC622 Cathode Material from Spent Nickel Catalyst

IF 0.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI:10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2023.55.5.4
E. Dyartanti, T. Paramitha, A. Jumari, Agus Purwanto, A. Nur, A. W. Budiman, S. S. Nisa
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Solid-State and Co-precipitation Methods for Synthesis of NMC622 Cathode Material from Spent Nickel Catalyst","authors":"E. Dyartanti, T. Paramitha, A. Jumari, Agus Purwanto, A. Nur, A. W. Budiman, S. S. Nisa","doi":"10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2023.55.5.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nickel, the main raw material for lithium-ion batteries (LIB), is currently the most in-demand metal. The rising need for nickel and current environmental concerns have underscored the importance of recycling waste metal to recover its value. Meanwhile, a significant secondary source with a high metal value is spent catalyst. In this context, the acid leaching method was used to recover nickel from spent catalyst. This study aimed to synthesize Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide 622 (NMC622) from spent catalyst. To determine the optimal method, a comparative analysis was conducted between solid-state and co-precipitation methods. Recycled spent nickel catalyst to be used for cathode material was examined by analytical methods, i.e., XRD, FTIR, SEM-EDX, and electrochemical performance testing. The XRD, FTIR, and SEM-EDX tests produced similar outcomes, consistent with previous reports. However, in the electrochemical test, the co-precipitation method showed a specific capacity two times higher than the solid-state method. The NMC622 from the co-precipitation method (NMC622-CP) yielded a specific discharge capacity of 132.82 mAh.g-1 at 0.1C, while the retention capacity was 70% for 50 cycles at 0.5C.","PeriodicalId":15689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2023.55.5.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nickel, the main raw material for lithium-ion batteries (LIB), is currently the most in-demand metal. The rising need for nickel and current environmental concerns have underscored the importance of recycling waste metal to recover its value. Meanwhile, a significant secondary source with a high metal value is spent catalyst. In this context, the acid leaching method was used to recover nickel from spent catalyst. This study aimed to synthesize Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide 622 (NMC622) from spent catalyst. To determine the optimal method, a comparative analysis was conducted between solid-state and co-precipitation methods. Recycled spent nickel catalyst to be used for cathode material was examined by analytical methods, i.e., XRD, FTIR, SEM-EDX, and electrochemical performance testing. The XRD, FTIR, and SEM-EDX tests produced similar outcomes, consistent with previous reports. However, in the electrochemical test, the co-precipitation method showed a specific capacity two times higher than the solid-state method. The NMC622 from the co-precipitation method (NMC622-CP) yielded a specific discharge capacity of 132.82 mAh.g-1 at 0.1C, while the retention capacity was 70% for 50 cycles at 0.5C.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用废镍催化剂合成 NMC622 阴极材料的固态法与共沉淀法比较研究
镍是锂离子电池(LIB)的主要原材料,也是目前需求量最大的金属。对镍需求的不断增长和当前的环境问题凸显了回收废金属以回收其价值的重要性。同时,废催化剂也是金属价值较高的重要二次来源。在这种情况下,采用酸浸法从废催化剂中回收镍。本研究旨在从废催化剂中合成镍锰钴锂氧化物 622(NMC622)。为确定最佳方法,对固态法和共沉淀法进行了比较分析。通过分析方法,即 XRD、FTIR、SEM-EDX 和电化学性能测试,对拟用作阴极材料的回收废镍催化剂进行了检测。XRD、傅立叶变换红外光谱和 SEM-EDX 测试结果相似,与之前的报告一致。不过,在电化学测试中,共沉淀法的比容量比固态法高两倍。共沉淀法制备的 NMC622(NMC622-CP)在 0.1C 下的比放电容量为 132.82 mAh.g-1,而在 0.5C 下循环 50 次的容量保持率为 70%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences
Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
77
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences welcomes full research articles in the area of Engineering Sciences from the following subject areas: Aerospace Engineering, Biotechnology, Chemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Engineering Physics, Environmental Engineering, Industrial Engineering, Information Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Material Science and Engineering, Manufacturing Processes, Microelectronics, Mining Engineering, Petroleum Engineering, and other application of physical, biological, chemical and mathematical sciences in engineering. Authors are invited to submit articles that have not been published previously and are not under consideration elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Green Energy Technologies: A Key Driver in Carbon Emission Reduction The Effect of Illumination, Electrode Distance, and Illumination Periods on the Performance of Phototrophic Sediment Microbial Fuel Cells (PSMFCs) Comparison Study of Corn Leaf Disease Detection based on Deep Learning YOLO-v5 and YOLO-v8 Hematite-Gamma Alumina-based Solid Catalyst Development for Biodiesel Production from Palm Oil Minimize Total Cost and Maximize Total Profit for Power Systems with Pumped Storage Hydro and Renewable Power Plants Using Improved Self-Organizing Migration Algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1