Nasal preparation prior to nasal endoscopy: a comparison of cotton pledget packing versus topical spray

K. Shrestha, A. Dhungana, A. S. Rijal, Rupesh Raj Joshi
{"title":"Nasal preparation prior to nasal endoscopy: a comparison of cotton pledget packing versus topical spray","authors":"K. Shrestha, A. Dhungana, A. S. Rijal, Rupesh Raj Joshi","doi":"10.3126/nmcj.v25i4.60926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nasal endoscopy (NE) is an office procedure done to look at the nasal and sinus passages using an endoscope which could be either rigid or flexible. It allows the clinician to characterize the intranasal anatomy better compared to the conventional techniques of headlight, speculum and mirror thus aiding the diagnosis. Therefore its popularity has increased recently and is one of the most frequently performed diagnostic procedures in Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery OPD. A unanimous consensus has not been reached regarding the best method for preparing the patients for NE. This study compares two methods of nasal preparation; cotton pledget packing and topical spray. A total of 100 patients were randomised into two groups of 50 each (A and B). In Group A, the nasal cavity was packed with a cotton pledget soaked in 4% lignocaine and xylometazoline nasal drops. Whereas in Group B, xylometazoline nasal drops were instilled and nasal cavity was sprayed with 10% lignocaine spray. After performing rigid nasal endoscopy, a proforma based on the patients’ and consultant’s response was filled. Patients in the cotton pledget group experienced more discomfort during packing (p=0.04), during the waiting time (p=0.001) and also during the endoscopic procedure. From the clinician’s perspective, the duration for the overall endoscopic procedure was significantly less in the spray group (p<0.001). Visualisation of structures was comparable in both groups. Less bleeding was experienced in the spray group. We concluded that nasal spray is a better alternative to nasal packing for preparation of nose prior to nasal endoscopy.","PeriodicalId":506882,"journal":{"name":"Nepal Medical College Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepal Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nmcj.v25i4.60926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nasal endoscopy (NE) is an office procedure done to look at the nasal and sinus passages using an endoscope which could be either rigid or flexible. It allows the clinician to characterize the intranasal anatomy better compared to the conventional techniques of headlight, speculum and mirror thus aiding the diagnosis. Therefore its popularity has increased recently and is one of the most frequently performed diagnostic procedures in Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery OPD. A unanimous consensus has not been reached regarding the best method for preparing the patients for NE. This study compares two methods of nasal preparation; cotton pledget packing and topical spray. A total of 100 patients were randomised into two groups of 50 each (A and B). In Group A, the nasal cavity was packed with a cotton pledget soaked in 4% lignocaine and xylometazoline nasal drops. Whereas in Group B, xylometazoline nasal drops were instilled and nasal cavity was sprayed with 10% lignocaine spray. After performing rigid nasal endoscopy, a proforma based on the patients’ and consultant’s response was filled. Patients in the cotton pledget group experienced more discomfort during packing (p=0.04), during the waiting time (p=0.001) and also during the endoscopic procedure. From the clinician’s perspective, the duration for the overall endoscopic procedure was significantly less in the spray group (p<0.001). Visualisation of structures was comparable in both groups. Less bleeding was experienced in the spray group. We concluded that nasal spray is a better alternative to nasal packing for preparation of nose prior to nasal endoscopy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻内窥镜检查前的鼻腔准备:棉签包装与局部喷雾的比较
鼻内窥镜检查(NE)是一种使用内窥镜检查鼻腔和鼻窦的诊疗方法,内窥镜可以是刚性的,也可以是柔性的。与头灯、窥镜和镜子等传统技术相比,鼻内窥镜能让临床医生更好地描述鼻腔内的解剖结构,从而帮助诊断。因此,该技术近来越来越受欢迎,成为耳鼻喉科和头颈外科门诊中最常用的诊断程序之一。关于为鼻内窥镜检查患者做准备的最佳方法,目前尚未达成一致共识。本研究比较了两种鼻腔准备方法:棉质填塞和局部喷雾。100 名患者被随机分为两组,每组 50 人(A 组和 B 组)。在 A 组中,用蘸有 4% 木酚卡因和二甲甲唑啉滴鼻液的棉签填塞鼻腔。而在 B 组中,则滴入西甲唑啉滴鼻液,并在鼻腔中喷洒 10%的木质素喷雾剂。在进行硬质鼻内窥镜检查后,根据患者和顾问的反应填写一份表格。棉签组患者在包装过程中(P=0.04)、等待时间(P=0.001)和内窥镜检查过程中都感到更多不适。从临床医生的角度来看,喷雾组患者的整个内窥镜手术时间明显更短(p<0.001)。两组的结构可视度相当。喷雾组出血较少。我们的结论是,在鼻内窥镜检查前的鼻腔准备中,喷鼻剂是鼻腔填料的更好替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discharge Against Medical Advice Among Neonates Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital The Association between S.T.O.N.E. Nephrolithometry Score and Hemoglobin Drop in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Perception of Objective Structured Clinical Examination Among Undergraduates Medical Students Knowledge of Tooth Discoloration and Tooth Bleaching amongst Adult Patients Visiting a Dental Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal Study of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcome of Acute Kidney Injury in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Tertiary Care Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1