Birthing Genre: Conventions of Rhetorical Situation and Accessibility of Information in Midwifery Manuals

Rebecca E. Burnett, Courtney A. Hoffman
{"title":"Birthing Genre: Conventions of Rhetorical Situation and Accessibility of Information in Midwifery Manuals","authors":"Rebecca E. Burnett, Courtney A. Hoffman","doi":"10.1177/00472816231216913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We ask, “What genre conventions are shared in 18th- and 21st-century midwifery manuals?” The article responds to this question by situating manuals as cultural arbiters and defining genre in a cultural context. The article identifies parallels between 18th-century and 21st-century midwifery manuals that focus on the rhetorical situation (via front matter, including title pages and prefaces) and accessibility of information (via design, definitions, and step-by-step procedures). Midwifery practices have changed drastically in the modern era, but the underlying goals—safety and health for the birthing person and child—remain constant. Increased publication of manuals dedicated to midwifery in the 18th century suggests a heightened focus on practices leading to successful outcomes in childbirth that highlight the value of examining manuals as a genre reflecting humanistic elements in technical documents. We argue that midwifery manuals emphasize underlying ideologies in the production and reproduction of socio-cultural consciousness still present today.","PeriodicalId":93788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of technical writing and communication","volume":"13 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of technical writing and communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816231216913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We ask, “What genre conventions are shared in 18th- and 21st-century midwifery manuals?” The article responds to this question by situating manuals as cultural arbiters and defining genre in a cultural context. The article identifies parallels between 18th-century and 21st-century midwifery manuals that focus on the rhetorical situation (via front matter, including title pages and prefaces) and accessibility of information (via design, definitions, and step-by-step procedures). Midwifery practices have changed drastically in the modern era, but the underlying goals—safety and health for the birthing person and child—remain constant. Increased publication of manuals dedicated to midwifery in the 18th century suggests a heightened focus on practices leading to successful outcomes in childbirth that highlight the value of examining manuals as a genre reflecting humanistic elements in technical documents. We argue that midwifery manuals emphasize underlying ideologies in the production and reproduction of socio-cultural consciousness still present today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分娩流派:助产手册中的修辞情境惯例和信息的可及性
我们不禁要问:"18 世纪和 21 世纪的助产手册有哪些共同的体裁惯例?文章通过将手册定位为文化仲裁者,并在文化背景下定义体裁,对这一问题做出了回应。文章指出了 18 世纪和 21 世纪助产手册之间的相似之处,这些相似之处侧重于修辞情境(通过标题页和序言等正面内容)和信息的可获取性(通过设计、定义和分步程序)。助产实践在现代发生了翻天覆地的变化,但其根本目标--分娩者和婴儿的安全与健康--却始终如一。18 世纪出版的助产手册越来越多,这表明人们更加关注成功分娩的实践,突出了将助产手册作为一种反映技术文件中人文元素的体裁进行研究的价值。我们认为,助产手册强调了社会文化意识产生和再生产过程中的潜在意识形态,这种意识形态今天依然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simply Effective? Simplified User Interfaces in Software Tutorials Improving ChatGPT's Competency in Generating Effective Business Communication Messages: Integrating Rhetorical Genre Analysis into Prompting Techniques Asking is Hard: Appeals Language in Kickstarter Crowdfunding Campaigns Improving Proposal Writing by Looking to Information Operations Role Play: Conversational Roles as a Framework for Reflexive Practice in AI-Assisted Qualitative Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1