Role Play: Conversational Roles as a Framework for Reflexive Practice in AI-Assisted Qualitative Research

Luke Thominet, Jacqueline Amorim, Kristine Acosta, V. K. Sohan
{"title":"Role Play: Conversational Roles as a Framework for Reflexive Practice in AI-Assisted Qualitative Research","authors":"Luke Thominet, Jacqueline Amorim, Kristine Acosta, V. K. Sohan","doi":"10.1177/00472816241260044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous literature has shown that generative artificial intelligence (GAI) software, including large language model (LLM) chatbots, might contribute to qualitative research studies. However, there is still a need to examine the relationships between researchers, GAI technologies, data, and findings. To address this need, our team conducted a thematic analysis of our reflexive journals from an LLM chatbot-assisted research project. We identified four roles that researchers adopted: managers closely monitored the LLM's work, teachers instructed the LLM on theories and methods, colleagues openly discussed the data with the LLM, and advocates worked with the LLM to improve user experiences. Planning for and playing with multiple roles also helped to enrich the research process. This study underscores the potential for using conversational roles as a framework to support reflexivity when working with GAI technologies on qualitative research.","PeriodicalId":93788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of technical writing and communication","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of technical writing and communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816241260044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous literature has shown that generative artificial intelligence (GAI) software, including large language model (LLM) chatbots, might contribute to qualitative research studies. However, there is still a need to examine the relationships between researchers, GAI technologies, data, and findings. To address this need, our team conducted a thematic analysis of our reflexive journals from an LLM chatbot-assisted research project. We identified four roles that researchers adopted: managers closely monitored the LLM's work, teachers instructed the LLM on theories and methods, colleagues openly discussed the data with the LLM, and advocates worked with the LLM to improve user experiences. Planning for and playing with multiple roles also helped to enrich the research process. This study underscores the potential for using conversational roles as a framework to support reflexivity when working with GAI technologies on qualitative research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
角色扮演:对话角色作为人工智能辅助定性研究中的反思性实践框架
以往的文献表明,包括大型语言模型(LLM)聊天机器人在内的生成式人工智能(GAI)软件可能有助于定性研究。然而,我们仍然需要研究研究人员、GAI 技术、数据和研究结果之间的关系。为了满足这一需求,我们团队对 LLM 聊天机器人辅助研究项目中的反思性日志进行了专题分析。我们发现了研究人员所扮演的四种角色:管理人员密切监督 LLM 的工作,教师指导 LLM 的理论和方法,同事与 LLM 公开讨论数据,倡导者与 LLM 合作改善用户体验。规划和扮演多重角色也有助于丰富研究过程。本研究强调了在使用 GAI 技术进行定性研究时,将对话角色作为支持反身性的框架的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simply Effective? Simplified User Interfaces in Software Tutorials Improving ChatGPT's Competency in Generating Effective Business Communication Messages: Integrating Rhetorical Genre Analysis into Prompting Techniques Asking is Hard: Appeals Language in Kickstarter Crowdfunding Campaigns Improving Proposal Writing by Looking to Information Operations Role Play: Conversational Roles as a Framework for Reflexive Practice in AI-Assisted Qualitative Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1