Comparative Analysis of GA-PRM Algorithm Performance in Simulation and Real-World Robotics Applications

Sarah Sabeeh, ,. I. S. Al-Furati
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of GA-PRM Algorithm Performance in Simulation and Real-World Robotics Applications","authors":"Sarah Sabeeh, ,. I. S. Al-Furati","doi":"10.61263/mjes.v2i2.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the performance of the Genetic Algorithm Probabilistic Roadmap (GA-PRM) algorithm in both simulated and real-world robotic environments. The GA-PRM algorithm is a promising approach for robot path planning, and understanding its behavior in different settings is crucial for its practical applications. In simulations, we explore the advantages of controlled and reproducible test conditions, allowing for extensive parameter tuning and algorithm improvement. Real-world testing is employed to validate the algorithm's performance in actual robotic environments, taking into account the inherent complexities and uncertainties present. In our comparative analysis, we found that the GA-PRM algorithm demonstrates significant improvements in real-world scenarios compared to simulations. Specifically, the algorithm produced shorter paths in real-world robot testing, with an average length of 21.428 cm, as opposed to 25.6235 units in simulations. Moreover, the computational efficiency of the algorithm was notably enhanced in the real-world environment, where it took only 0.375 seconds on average to plan paths, compared to 0.6881 seconds in simulations. The algorithm also exhibited higher path smoothness in the real world, with an average smoothness score of 0.432, compared to 0.3133 in simulations. These results underscore the algorithm's adaptability to real-world conditions and its potential for efficient navigation in practical healthcare and automation applications. Our research bridges the gap between simulation and reality, facilitating the development of more reliable and adaptable robotic systems. The insights gained from this comparative evaluation contribute to a deeper understanding of the GA-PRM algorithm's behavior and its potentials.","PeriodicalId":253933,"journal":{"name":"Misan Journal of Engineering Sciences","volume":"35 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Misan Journal of Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61263/mjes.v2i2.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the performance of the Genetic Algorithm Probabilistic Roadmap (GA-PRM) algorithm in both simulated and real-world robotic environments. The GA-PRM algorithm is a promising approach for robot path planning, and understanding its behavior in different settings is crucial for its practical applications. In simulations, we explore the advantages of controlled and reproducible test conditions, allowing for extensive parameter tuning and algorithm improvement. Real-world testing is employed to validate the algorithm's performance in actual robotic environments, taking into account the inherent complexities and uncertainties present. In our comparative analysis, we found that the GA-PRM algorithm demonstrates significant improvements in real-world scenarios compared to simulations. Specifically, the algorithm produced shorter paths in real-world robot testing, with an average length of 21.428 cm, as opposed to 25.6235 units in simulations. Moreover, the computational efficiency of the algorithm was notably enhanced in the real-world environment, where it took only 0.375 seconds on average to plan paths, compared to 0.6881 seconds in simulations. The algorithm also exhibited higher path smoothness in the real world, with an average smoothness score of 0.432, compared to 0.3133 in simulations. These results underscore the algorithm's adaptability to real-world conditions and its potential for efficient navigation in practical healthcare and automation applications. Our research bridges the gap between simulation and reality, facilitating the development of more reliable and adaptable robotic systems. The insights gained from this comparative evaluation contribute to a deeper understanding of the GA-PRM algorithm's behavior and its potentials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
仿真和实际机器人应用中 GA-PRM 算法性能的对比分析
摘要:本文全面分析了遗传算法概率路线图(GA-PRM)算法在模拟和实际机器人环境中的表现。GA-PRM 算法是一种很有前途的机器人路径规划方法,了解它在不同环境下的行为对其实际应用至关重要。在模拟中,我们探索了可控和可重现测试条件的优势,从而可以进行广泛的参数调整和算法改进。考虑到固有的复杂性和不确定性,我们采用真实世界测试来验证算法在实际机器人环境中的性能。在对比分析中,我们发现 GA-PRM 算法在实际场景中的表现比模拟情况有显著改善。具体来说,该算法在实际机器人测试中产生的路径更短,平均长度为 21.428 厘米,而模拟测试中的平均长度为 25.6235 单位。此外,该算法的计算效率在真实环境中也得到了显著提高,规划路径平均只需 0.375 秒,而模拟只需 0.6881 秒。该算法在真实世界中还表现出更高的路径平滑度,平均平滑度得分为 0.432,而模拟得分为 0.3133。这些结果凸显了该算法对真实世界条件的适应性,以及在实际医疗保健和自动化应用中实现高效导航的潜力。我们的研究弥补了模拟与现实之间的差距,促进了更可靠、适应性更强的机器人系统的开发。从比较评估中获得的见解有助于加深对 GA-PRM 算法行为及其潜力的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Experimental Study on Modified Concrete Using Partial Replacement of Gravel and Admixtures Experimental and Numerical Study of Torsional Solid and Hollow Section of Polyolefin Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams Improvement of Concrete Mechanical Properties by Adding Nanomaterials A New Theory of Damage Estimation and Fatigue Life Prediction Comparative Analysis of GA-PRM Algorithm Performance in Simulation and Real-World Robotics Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1