Perception and Experience of Teachers in Implication of Inductive and Deductive Methods in Mathematics Classes

H. Sapkota
{"title":"Perception and Experience of Teachers in Implication of Inductive and Deductive Methods in Mathematics Classes","authors":"H. Sapkota","doi":"10.3126/jme.v5i1.60848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to explore the teachers’ experiences and perceptions towards the implication of inductive and deductive methods in mathematics classes at the primary level. The inductive method is the beginning of all mathematics and derives the formula; the deductive method is the continuity of it and implements those formulas. This article is based on a phenomenological research method under qualitative design, focusing on the lived experience of four primary mathematics teachers on the ‘implementation of inductive and deductive method’ in elementary mathematics classes and their perceptions towards these methods. The data were analyzed and interpreted by using the thematic analyzing approach. The findings of the study show that the teachers were in a dilemma in the selection of proper teaching methods in mathematics teaching, and they followed the traditional methods. Knowingly or unknowingly, the teachers were using inductive and deductive methods, but they were not sure about the correct implementation of those methods. Their perceptions towards the inductive method was positive and they believed that it helps students for developing permanent concepts; however, the teachers were confused in its implications. Most of the teachers were following the traditional teaching methods in mathematics classes instead of student-centered teaching methods. They argued that for a short-cut and easy for the implementation, they were using the traditional methods. The teachers should be trained for better implementation of the inductive and deductive methods in the proper teaching of mathematics at the primary level.","PeriodicalId":508235,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics Education","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jme.v5i1.60848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the teachers’ experiences and perceptions towards the implication of inductive and deductive methods in mathematics classes at the primary level. The inductive method is the beginning of all mathematics and derives the formula; the deductive method is the continuity of it and implements those formulas. This article is based on a phenomenological research method under qualitative design, focusing on the lived experience of four primary mathematics teachers on the ‘implementation of inductive and deductive method’ in elementary mathematics classes and their perceptions towards these methods. The data were analyzed and interpreted by using the thematic analyzing approach. The findings of the study show that the teachers were in a dilemma in the selection of proper teaching methods in mathematics teaching, and they followed the traditional methods. Knowingly or unknowingly, the teachers were using inductive and deductive methods, but they were not sure about the correct implementation of those methods. Their perceptions towards the inductive method was positive and they believed that it helps students for developing permanent concepts; however, the teachers were confused in its implications. Most of the teachers were following the traditional teaching methods in mathematics classes instead of student-centered teaching methods. They argued that for a short-cut and easy for the implementation, they were using the traditional methods. The teachers should be trained for better implementation of the inductive and deductive methods in the proper teaching of mathematics at the primary level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师对归纳法和演绎法在数学课中的应用的看法和经验
本文旨在探讨小学数学课上教师对归纳法和演绎法影响的经验和看法。归纳法是所有数学的开端,是公式的推导;演绎法是归纳法的延续,是公式的实施。本文采用定性设计下的现象学研究方法,重点研究四位小学数学教师在小学数学课堂上 "归纳法和演绎法的实施 "的生活经验以及他们对这些方法的看法。研究采用主题分析法对数据进行了分析和解释。研究结果表明,在数学教学中,教师在选择适当的教学方法时陷入了两难境地,他们沿用了传统的教学方法。教师们有意无意地使用了归纳法和演绎法,但他们对这些方法的正确实施并不确定。他们对归纳法的看法是积极的,认为归纳法有助于学生形成永久性概念;但是,教师们对归纳法的含义感到困惑。大多数教师在数学课上沿用传统的教学方法,而不是以学生为中心的教学方法。他们认为,为了走捷径和便于实施,他们使用了传统方法。教师应接受培训,以便在小学数学教学中更好地实施归纳和演绎法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Teachers’ Experiences on the Construction and Use of Teaching Materials in Mathematics Classroom: A Narrative Inquiry Ethnomathematical Study on Cultural Artifacts: An Ethnographic Field to Classroom Practice Expectations of Undergraduate Students from Teachers in Learning Mathematics नेपालमा स्थानीय पाठ्यक्रमको अवधारणा, अवस्था र गणितीय विषय क्षेत्रको स्थान: एक सिंहावलोकन Demystification of Geometrical Patterns through Cultural Activities in Bamboo/Nigalo Baskets (Doko)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1